Anthony Rapp, currently starring as an openly gay engineer in "Star Trek: Discovery," recently told the world of the time he had been sexually assaulted, at age 14, by mega-successful A-list actor Kevin Spacey, who has starred in movies like "American Beauty" and "Se7en." While reactions have generally been sympathetic, there's been a substantial amount of blowback against Rapp, especially on Twitter. See this site for specifics, and note the hilarious lack of self-awareness among Rapp's attackers: imagine if Rapp were a woman instead. Would gibes like this be tolerated? Aren't we supposed to automatically, reflexively, unquestioningly believe someone when that person claims to have been sexually harassed, attacked, etc.?*
Spacey, for his part, apparently hasn't denied that the attack may have occurred, and in a suspiciously timed pronouncement, he has finally come out as gay—one of Hollywood's most open of open secrets. Spacey's hit TV series, "House of Cards," now moves into its sixth and final season. We can only wonder whether the finality of the final season has anything to do with Rapp's outing of Spacey.
*If this question seems sarcastically over-the-top to you, you're not hallucinating. Libertarian-leaning Instapundit has spent a lot of time and column-inches, over the past few years, sowing doubt into the minds of the public by publishing and pursuing story after story of false claims of rape and assault on US college campuses. Each false claim brought up on Instapundit has proven demonstrably false, thus spreading skepticism more widely about rape/assault claims in general. This doesn't mean I sympathize with Rapp's attackers, but it does mean that we need to stick to the old standard of "innocent until proven guilty" before passing definitive judgment. At the same time, you're certainly entitled to your opinion based on your own interpretation of the evidence... but when the evidence begins to weigh heavily in a certain direction, your opinion needs to change according to the accumulating facts.
Tuesday, October 31, 2017
Happy Halloween!
The second link is from a while back, but still charming. The first link has some truly clever costumes. The "guy cut in half" one (it's at #42: you have to click forward a few pages to see it) mystifies me. I'd love to know how that one's done.
Creative Halloween Costumes
Creepy Pumpkin Carvings
Creative Halloween Costumes
Creepy Pumpkin Carvings
Monday, October 30, 2017
flights of lasagnas sing thee to thy rest
I just bought a mess of Italian cheeses—plus one French cheese—that are going to be mixed together into one titanic pile, then slathered onto lasagna pasta and cooked for a massive lunch this coming Friday. I don't have any large baking dishes, which means I'll have to cook a small armada of mini-lasagnas.* Each dish will contain enough lasagna for 2-3 servings (which is not the same as saying 2-3 people). I suppose I'll also need to prep garlic bread and caprese; the latter will have to happen on Friday morning.
Yikes, come to think of it, I guess a pesto will also have to be in the works...
*Our R&D department just acquired its tenth and final member, a second graphic designer who speaks almost no English, so... une bouche de plus à nourrir.
Yikes, come to think of it, I guess a pesto will also have to be in the works...
*Our R&D department just acquired its tenth and final member, a second graphic designer who speaks almost no English, so... une bouche de plus à nourrir.
Sunday, October 29, 2017
lotsa cooking
This weekend, I busied myself with two enormous cooking projects: the creation of the best damn spaghetti sauce I've ever made, and the making of several batches of my low-carb Chinese-style meal to last me through the coming week.
The spaghetti sauce that I made uses a different approach from sauces I've done previously: this time around, I synthesized the advice from two sources: (1) the Binging with Babish YouTube channel (specifically, a recent video on sauces, which includes a segment on red sauce—see here), and (2) a Serious Eats recipe for "the best" slow-cooked tomato sauce. From Babish, I picked up the idea of starting with a base of garlic and onion, then building the sauce outward from there with whole tomatoes. (Many Italians will start with fat rendered from some fatty meat, such as bacon, etc.) From Serious Eats, I picked up the idea (well, I've actually done this before) of adding ground carrots to the sauce, as well as adding a modest dash of fish sauce for greater umami. The fish sauce is a game-changer, radically deepening the character of the red sauce, but to avoid an overly fishy taste, you need to add the sauce early and let it cook for a while. Otherwise, if you like the fishy taste, add shrimp or some other seafood as your protein instead of pork or beef. For my protein, I used homemade Italian sausage, which turned out okay. The meat could have used about twice as much fennel. At the end of the cook, I added minced fresh parsley and basil, plus some bay leaves and red wine (with humble thanks to my company, which gifted us with a wine set for Chuseok*).
You've seen my low-carb Chinese meals before; see here to refresh your memory. All the same, I'll be uploading photos of both dishes sometime tonight or tomorrow, so stay tuned.
*The wines, a red and a white, are both Italian, and they're both sparkling and sweet—somewhat hard to take seriously, but the red wine provides enough of an alcoholic layer to the red sauce that I don't mind its lack of sophistication—not that I'd know what a sophisticated red wine tasted like, given that I only ever use alcohol when I'm cooking.
The spaghetti sauce that I made uses a different approach from sauces I've done previously: this time around, I synthesized the advice from two sources: (1) the Binging with Babish YouTube channel (specifically, a recent video on sauces, which includes a segment on red sauce—see here), and (2) a Serious Eats recipe for "the best" slow-cooked tomato sauce. From Babish, I picked up the idea of starting with a base of garlic and onion, then building the sauce outward from there with whole tomatoes. (Many Italians will start with fat rendered from some fatty meat, such as bacon, etc.) From Serious Eats, I picked up the idea (well, I've actually done this before) of adding ground carrots to the sauce, as well as adding a modest dash of fish sauce for greater umami. The fish sauce is a game-changer, radically deepening the character of the red sauce, but to avoid an overly fishy taste, you need to add the sauce early and let it cook for a while. Otherwise, if you like the fishy taste, add shrimp or some other seafood as your protein instead of pork or beef. For my protein, I used homemade Italian sausage, which turned out okay. The meat could have used about twice as much fennel. At the end of the cook, I added minced fresh parsley and basil, plus some bay leaves and red wine (with humble thanks to my company, which gifted us with a wine set for Chuseok*).
You've seen my low-carb Chinese meals before; see here to refresh your memory. All the same, I'll be uploading photos of both dishes sometime tonight or tomorrow, so stay tuned.
*The wines, a red and a white, are both Italian, and they're both sparkling and sweet—somewhat hard to take seriously, but the red wine provides enough of an alcoholic layer to the red sauce that I don't mind its lack of sophistication—not that I'd know what a sophisticated red wine tasted like, given that I only ever use alcohol when I'm cooking.
a "Game of Thrones" primer with Samuel L. Jackson
For anyone unfamiliar with the TV series "Game of Thrones," which is based on the A Song of Ice and Fire series of fantasy novels by George RR Martin, here's a delightfully hilarious primer narrated by none other than Samuel L. Jackson, the man who has cornered the market on saying "motherfucker."
Saturday, October 28, 2017
Ave, John!
With his penchant for cleverly revealing plot twists while narrating emotional roller coasters, John McCrarey really ought to be a screenwriter.
Here's why.
Here's why.
Jon and Dany have a side job
Kit Harington and Emilia Clarke do more than just play Jon Snow and Daenerys Targaryen on "Game of Thrones." I saw these large ads staring at me over at Lotte World Mall yesterday, when I was leaving after having watched "Thor: Ragnarok":
Ragnarok explained
The Crash Course Mythology series includes an episode in which Mike Rugnetta briefly explains Ragnarok, the Norse version of the end times:
Friday, October 27, 2017
"Thor: Ragnarok": review
Not as gut-bustingly hilarious as "Deadpool," but funny on its own terms, 2017's "Thor: Ragnarok" is a superhero-adventure movie directed by mad Kiwi Taika Waititi and starring Chris Hemsworth, Tessa Thompson, Tom Hiddleston, Cate Blanchett, Mark Ruffalo, Idris Elba, Karl Urban, Anthony Hopkins, and Jeff Goldblum. Benedict Cumberbatch makes an early cameo as Dr. Strange, whose magical abilities prove more than equal to the challenge of fighting Asgardians, and Waititi himself is in the film, covered in mo-cap CGI and playing a hulking stone alien named Korg.
The movie begins with Thor (Hemsworth) as a captive in some hellish cave, narrating his plight to a skeleton that's in his cage with him. He speaks of traveling the cosmos in search of the mysterious Infinity Stones, which several Marvel movies have already referenced (there are six stones, each representing a primordial cosmic power). Unsuccessful in this quest, Thor now finds himself the prisoner of Surtur (Clancy Brown!!), a Balrog-like demon lord who reveals that Thor's adoptive brother Loki (Hiddleston) has been impersonating Odin (Hopkins) and ruling Asgard. Surtur also reveals that the time for Ragnarok approaches: the prophesied apocalyptic destruction of Asgard, entailing the deaths of many gods. Thor manages to defeat Surtur and escape; he travels to Asgard to unmask Loki, then he and Loki travel to Earth to find Odin, whom Loki had apparently left in an old-folks' home that has since been demolished. With help from Dr. Strange, Thor finds Odin in Norway, where Odin imparts some seemingly final advice before disappearing, like Master Oogway in "Kung Fu Panda," in a gentle dispersal of shimmering light (do gods ever really die?). Odin also reveals, before his mystical disappearance, that Thor has an elder sister: Hela, firstborn of Odin and goddess of death, whom Odin has kept imprisoned for eons. Hela is now free, and after Odin departs, she appears. In the ensuing conflict, during which Hela easily destroys Thor's hammer Mjolnir, Thor and Loki attempt to use the Bifrost bridge to transport themselves back to their native realm of Asgard, but they instead end up on the garbage-dump planet of Sakaar. This world is crawling with scavengers and is ruled by The Grandmaster (Goldblum), a cheerfully gaudy ancient being who entertains the unruly populace by hosting a huge gladiatorial contest. Loki somehow manages to ingratiate himself to the Grandmaster, but Thor is captured and sent into the fighting pit, where he meets none other than the Hulk.
All of this is a massive setup for the rest of "Thor: Ragnarok," which is about Thor's attempt to escape Sakaar and return to Asgard to save it from destruction. With Thor absent from Asgard, Hela lays waste to the realm's army with the help of Skurge (Urban), who doesn't quite share Hela's taste for violence, death, and destruction. Thor, meanwhile, enlists the help of the Hulk, Loki, and an alcoholic Valkyrie (Thompson) who has abandoned Asgard after her own nasty run-in with Hela ages ago.
"Ragnarok" sets a fast pace and doesn't let up. A giddy, ridiculous mishmash of superhero action, sci-fi adventure, and lighthearted comedy, the movie reminds me of nothing so much as the old Indiana Jones films, with all their hither-and-thither gallivanting: now we're in the demon's realm, now we're on Earth, now we're on Sakaar, now we're on Asgard, and now we're flying into a wormhole-like gateway lovingly referred to as The Devil's Anus. Humor is seeded throughout the film; some are calling "Ragnarok" a "Thor reboot" because we get to see the less serious and more ludicrous side of Thor and Asgardian mythology. The musical soundtrack for the film is a weird blend of boilerplate sci-adventure and disco, which gives the film a retro feel that is reinforced by the movie's cheerfully flashy color palette—a homage to influential comic artist Jack Kirby.
Taika Waititi is a hoot both in front of and behind the camera: as the movie's director, he has an eye for action and spectacle, and he's obviously a fan of all these Marvel characters. As an actor playing the alien Korg, who is made of living rock, Waititi blends in perfectly with the movie's comic tone. I'd never heard of Waititi before; his filmography doesn't seem to include much in the way of internationally famous works. I have heard, though, that Marvel often likes to take risks by using heretofore-unknown directors, and in this case—as with first-timer Tim Miller, who directed "Deadpool"—the studio gambled and won big. Waititi is a talent to watch for; I'll be curious to see what films he does next. He brings a certain freshness and lack of cynicism to the proceedings; these qualities keep the Marvel brand from going stale despite the current prominence (some might say oppression) of superhero movies.
Given the extent to which "Ragnarok" is a comedy, all the principal actors had to bring their comic chops. Chris Hemsworth gets to show off his funny side, and his Thor has obviously relaxed and acquired Terran speech habits: his diction is more modern and slangy than ever before; Karl Urban is also surprisingly goofy as Skurge, who loves to show off to the ladies. Cate Blanchett, in full-on Galadriel mode, ably incarnates the teeth-flashing, blade-throwing goddess of death; Tessa Thompson does a good job standing toe to toe opposite Hemsworth. Mark Ruffalo and Jeff Goldblum show off their trademark diffident charm. Poor Idris Elba is about the only actor required to remain lugubrious: his Heimdall is all business as the Asgardian who leads the general population to safety, away from the destruction of the realm.
Not to say the movie is without its problems. I still have trouble figuring out the theology of the Marvel universe. Obviously, if Marvel is following the Norse myth, then the gods are destructible—hence their Götterdämmerung. That being said, they're extremely hard to kill, and it's not obvious that they can or do stay dead. Given their native toughness, I don't understand how Valkyrie, on the order of a goddess herself, is able to get drunk on so little alcohol. What makes her so susceptible to the power of grapes and hops? The same goes for Thor who, while a prisoner on Sakaar, receives the equivalent of a "Star Wars"-style restraining bolt on his neck to keep him from wreaking havoc. How can he be so easily restrained? Does Sakaar regularly receive a complement of gods—enough to have learned how to develop god-subduing technology? (There may be evidence that it does, in fact, receive a steady stream of mighty beings from all over the cosmos.)
My second quibble is that Ragnarok, the event, happens fairly late in the story, when the movie is about three-quarters done. That's a lot of buildup for what should have been the movie's primary focus, given its title. Instead, most of the movie depicts Thor's various trials and attempts at team-building, creating a protracted prelude for relatively little payoff.
Then there's the problem with Hela, who is supposed to be the goddess of death. Given that death is a deeply inscribed fact of life, I'd have thought she would be far more powerful than she appeared to be in "Ragnarok." Death is a cosmic principle—a species of change, ensuring that nothing lasts forever. Why would the entity who governs that cosmic principle even need to engage in physical combat with anyone? Also: death is, traditionally, an even-handed cosmic principle that comes for the rich and the poor, the good and the evil, the weak and the strong alike. What we see instead is that Hela-as-death is actively evil, more of a demoness than a hooded, reaping angel with an impartial scythe. It could simply be that my unfamiliarity with the Hela from the comic books, coupled with my religious-studies background, keeps me from fully appreciating the character as presented by Marvel.
Those problems notwithstanding, "Thor: Ragnarok" is a fun ride. Its brisk pace, humorous tone, engaging story, and splendid visuals make it a worthwhile viewing experience for both the initiated and the uninitiated.
"I am rubber; you are glue..."
The Trump-Russia narrative continues to go down like the Hindenburg:
Styx:
PJ Watson:
This rebound effect seems to happen a lot: attack Trump, and your weapon turns against you. My advice to Trump haters: if you want to defeat the Orangeman, you need to make the effort to understand him first, and not merely think you understand him.
Styx:
PJ Watson:
This rebound effect seems to happen a lot: attack Trump, and your weapon turns against you. My advice to Trump haters: if you want to defeat the Orangeman, you need to make the effort to understand him first, and not merely think you understand him.
Thursday, October 26, 2017
the most badass article ever
You will actually feel your testicles growing inside your pants* as you read this tough-as-nails-no-tougher-than-T.rex-claws article about fighting and killing techniques as taught by expert Tim Larkin. I swear, some of the wisdom I read in this article could be easily applied outside the context of hand-to-hand combat:
Tim Larkin: America's answer to Sun-tzu.
*And, ladies: you will actually feel yourselves growing testicles as you read this article.
"Probably the most controversial thing that we advocate is to focus on stopping someone via causing an injury, rather than trying to block an attack."
"When you look at the videos of real violence, real fights, it is the people who try to block or protect themselves that end up getting stabbed, kicked or punched to death."
"If you choose to ignore the tool of violence, then it is only going to be available to the predators."
"A lot of the martial arts schools will teach you clever-looking techniques that look great but don't actually work in the real world. But what you've got to do is inflict enough pain for your opponent to literally seize up."
"Here's the issue with 'proportionate response': it is a great theory, but the only ones who are actually concerned by it are law-abiding citizens. Most of the time you're facing someone who is going to use a disproportionate level of violence, and most likely you'll be facing multiple attackers."
"When a population lives with the threat of violence, they know how to use it against perpetrators when necessary. Here in the West we're not willing to do that, and it leaves us frighteningly vulnerable."
Tim Larkin: America's answer to Sun-tzu.
*And, ladies: you will actually feel yourselves growing testicles as you read this article.
the alt-right... explained?
Prager University takes a stab at explaining the alt-right:
I have no idea how true or accurate this explanation is—there are so many competing definitions of the term "alt-right" out there—but I appreciate its concision and precision. At the same time, the viewer has to keep in mind that Prager U. is a voice for a more mainstream version of conservatism, so of course there's a great deal of bias and skew on display.
I have no idea how true or accurate this explanation is—there are so many competing definitions of the term "alt-right" out there—but I appreciate its concision and precision. At the same time, the viewer has to keep in mind that Prager U. is a voice for a more mainstream version of conservatism, so of course there's a great deal of bias and skew on display.
the flagnianthem* paradox and other oddities
As explained here:
Not knowing history seems to be an increasingly serious problem:
*Pronounce it "flag, knee, anthem," and it'll make sense.
Members of the Baltimore Ravens and Jacksonville Jaguars appearing at London’s Wembley Stadium even chose to dishonor the U.S. flag on foreign soil. But they stood for God Save the Queen, the anthem that was playing when most of Africa was placed under British colonial rule. These jocks probably were not history majors.
Not knowing history seems to be an increasingly serious problem:
Why would they be so angry about Lincoln?
“Everyone thinks of Lincoln as the great, you know, freer of slaves, but let’s be real: He owned slaves, and as natives, we want people to know that he ordered the execution of native men,” said one of the protesters.
“Just to have him here at the top of Bascom is just really belittling.”
This claim from the protester is patently false. The Great Emancipator grew up in poverty and never owned slaves.
Not only that, but his debates with fellow Illinois statesman Stephen A. Douglas offer some of the clearest reasons for why the institution of slavery violated the American creed.
*Pronounce it "flag, knee, anthem," and it'll make sense.
Wednesday, October 25, 2017
want maggots? we got maggots
Here (and not for the timid). Don't stop with the maggot-ridden woman: scroll down and see the maggoty dog, too.
TRIVIA: although there's a cafe in France called Les Deux Magots, the French word for "maggot" is actually asticot. According to the Lexilogos online French dictionary, a magot can be a type of macaque, a trinket you place in a window or on a shelf, precious objects that get hidden, or a large sum of money.
TRIVIA: although there's a cafe in France called Les Deux Magots, the French word for "maggot" is actually asticot. According to the Lexilogos online French dictionary, a magot can be a type of macaque, a trinket you place in a window or on a shelf, precious objects that get hidden, or a large sum of money.
two from Pepple
Philoblogger John Pepple has been on fire lately, writing a few short posts in rapid succession.
Here's one on Catalonian independence:
And here's one on "Weinstein, Feminists, and Muslims":
Here's one on Catalonian independence:
The lesson here is not at all what some were imagining at the start of the independence campaign. The lesson now is not going to be about the independence of other regions of Spain or of Scotland or of California. No, it’s going to be about using force and how effective it is. For the last fifty years or so, there have been protests by people who basically were allowed to do whatever they wanted without generating much in the way of backlash from the authorities. This time it was different.
And here's one on "Weinstein, Feminists, and Muslims":
Keep in mind that all these feminists who are now piling onto men who engaged in sexual misconduct in Hollywood are the same ones who said little or nothing about the news from Rotherham or Cologne. Some of us warned that there would be problems for women if all those refugees were let in, and we were called racist.
internet fiasco and aftermath
When my Net service went out last Wednesday, I spoke with my building's lobby guard/concierge about what to do, and he said I'd need to talk to whichever company was supplying the connection. I went back, checked my modem, and discovered it was a KT/Tellion device. As I may have blogged before, finding the customer-service contact was impossible: the phone number listed on the modem's underside was no longer in service, and the same was true for the phone number listed on the Tellion website. KT, which is a huge telecom company, has its own customer-service number somewhere, but the company makes that number devilishly hard to find via online search (shades of Amazon.com, which also doesn't like it when customers try to phone in).
So I did what a coworker of mine did and contacted my own company's HR department. I was told that someone would be sent out on Monday. Monday morning, around 10AM, I emailed HR to ask when the repairman would arrive, as I hoped to leave my place by 11AM (I get to work late, and I stay late, but I always put in my nine* hours). HR replied that the repairman would be by around 11AM, so please wait. I waited... and waited... and waited. Three fucking hours later, I emailed HR to say I wouldn't be waiting any longer and would go to work. HR said they had heard that the repairman had come by. I testily responded that I had been in my place all day, wasting my time, and no one had come by. Eventually, it turned out that HR had dispatched a repairman to Ilsan—a completely different city—because the HR staffer with whom I'd been talking had somehow thought I was a Kevin who worked at my company's Ilsan branch. Profuse apologies followed; I tiredly replied that it was okay because it was Monday, and we all hate Mondays. HR said they would reschedule a visit ASAP.
End result: when I got back to my place around 2AM Tuesday morning (I had stayed at my office very late because I had arrived very late after having wasted 3.5 hours waiting for the repairman), I saw that items on my desk had been moved, which meant that someone had been in my place. I immediately deduced that the repairman had come by and restored Net service (I had given my apartment's pass code to HR; they doubtless relayed that code to the repairman), which turned out to be the correct surmise. As happened with my coworker, my ancient modem had been switched out with a newer one, which is also a KT/Tellion modem, so I guess Tellion, as a company, still exists. Given the outdated phone number and un-updated website, I had assumed that Tellion had disappeared.
For what it's worth, I'm back in business and no longer obliged to perform all my personal online activity at the office. I did, however, enjoy using my office's super-fast Net connection and extra-large monitors to watch the remainder of Season 7 of "Game of Thrones." Now, the only worry I have is a remark that the repairman made to HR regarding my laptop: the repairman thinks it may have a virus or some other problem. I'm pretty sure it's not a virus, given that this is a Mac (I know: Macs can get viruses, too, but only rarely), but I do know there's something wrong with my computer, given the quirky way in which its low-capacity internal drive fills up so easily with data. If there were a Mac Genius Bar somewhere nearby, I'd schedule an appointment for my machine, but since there isn't, I'm probably not going to do much of anything for the nonce.
*That's eight hours of work plus an hour for lunch.
So I did what a coworker of mine did and contacted my own company's HR department. I was told that someone would be sent out on Monday. Monday morning, around 10AM, I emailed HR to ask when the repairman would arrive, as I hoped to leave my place by 11AM (I get to work late, and I stay late, but I always put in my nine* hours). HR replied that the repairman would be by around 11AM, so please wait. I waited... and waited... and waited. Three fucking hours later, I emailed HR to say I wouldn't be waiting any longer and would go to work. HR said they had heard that the repairman had come by. I testily responded that I had been in my place all day, wasting my time, and no one had come by. Eventually, it turned out that HR had dispatched a repairman to Ilsan—a completely different city—because the HR staffer with whom I'd been talking had somehow thought I was a Kevin who worked at my company's Ilsan branch. Profuse apologies followed; I tiredly replied that it was okay because it was Monday, and we all hate Mondays. HR said they would reschedule a visit ASAP.
End result: when I got back to my place around 2AM Tuesday morning (I had stayed at my office very late because I had arrived very late after having wasted 3.5 hours waiting for the repairman), I saw that items on my desk had been moved, which meant that someone had been in my place. I immediately deduced that the repairman had come by and restored Net service (I had given my apartment's pass code to HR; they doubtless relayed that code to the repairman), which turned out to be the correct surmise. As happened with my coworker, my ancient modem had been switched out with a newer one, which is also a KT/Tellion modem, so I guess Tellion, as a company, still exists. Given the outdated phone number and un-updated website, I had assumed that Tellion had disappeared.
For what it's worth, I'm back in business and no longer obliged to perform all my personal online activity at the office. I did, however, enjoy using my office's super-fast Net connection and extra-large monitors to watch the remainder of Season 7 of "Game of Thrones." Now, the only worry I have is a remark that the repairman made to HR regarding my laptop: the repairman thinks it may have a virus or some other problem. I'm pretty sure it's not a virus, given that this is a Mac (I know: Macs can get viruses, too, but only rarely), but I do know there's something wrong with my computer, given the quirky way in which its low-capacity internal drive fills up so easily with data. If there were a Mac Genius Bar somewhere nearby, I'd schedule an appointment for my machine, but since there isn't, I'm probably not going to do much of anything for the nonce.
*That's eight hours of work plus an hour for lunch.
Tuesday, October 24, 2017
"Kingsman" actors try Korean fried chicken and beer
Whatever your feelings on "Kingsman," you might find this amusing: Taron Egerton and Mark Strong were recently in Seoul, where they met up with Josh, the young, Korean-speaking Brit who runs the popular YouTube channel Yeongguk Namja (Englishman). Josh set the stars up with a boatload of Korean fried chicken, and it's all on video for your delectation:
The Korean title of the video (small font, top of screen) says "(What's the) Reaction of 'Kingsman' Actors Trying Korean Chicken-and-Beer for the First Time?" Thankfully, we don't see the Brits reacting to Korean beer, which is, from what I hear, generally piss on the order of generic American beer.
The Korean title of the video (small font, top of screen) says "(What's the) Reaction of 'Kingsman' Actors Trying Korean Chicken-and-Beer for the First Time?" Thankfully, we don't see the Brits reacting to Korean beer, which is, from what I hear, generally piss on the order of generic American beer.
"Kingsman: The Golden Circle": review
[NB: SPOILERS!]
Director Matthew Vaughn is at it again in 2017's "Kingsman: The Golden Circle," which stars Taron Egerton, Mark Strong, Halle Berry, Pedro Pascal, Jeff Bridges, Channing Tatum, Hanna Alström, Colin Firth (yes, Galahad is back), Julianne Moore and, bizarrely, Elton John. Guest stars include Michael Gambon, Sophie Cookson, and Bruce Greenwood (Captain Pike in the JJ Abrams "Star Trek" movies).
The movie opens, hilariously, with a Scots bagpipe version of John Denver's "Country Roads"—a comic move that will, sadly, turn out to be a clever bit of foreshadowing in a movie that generally lacks clever moments. We meet Eggsy (Egerton) right away, and we see him conversing with Roxy (Cookson) and the new Arthur (Gambon) who now heads up Kingsman. Not long after that, a brace of missiles destroys all branches of Kingsman, killing Arthur, Roxy, and every Kingsman operative aside from Merlin (Strong) and Eggsy. This event prompts Merlin to activate the Doomsday Protocol, which sends the two remaining British superspies to America, where they meet the cowboyish Statesmen—the Yankee counterpart to the Kingsmen. This doesn't go well at first: when they sneak into the Statesman compound in Kentucky, Merlin and Eggsy (who is using Galahad's handle since Colin Firth's Galahad is presumably dead) are handily defeated by Tequila (Tatum), who captures the Brits and reveals that the Statesmen have Harry Hart, the senior Galahad (Firth), who was saved from his gunshot to the head in the previous movie by alpha gel—a nanotech product designed to rescue victims of head shots. Alpha gel is injected into the gunshot wound, and nanobots enter the wound and immediately begin stabilizing the victim and repairing bone and tissue damage. But Hart/Galahad is far from whole: his brain damage has led to a deep-seated amnesia, and attempts to trigger his old memories have, up to now, failed.
Meanwhile, hiding out in the jungles of Cambodia, dainty, Fifties-nostalgia-loving Poppy Adams (Moore) has made herself into the ultimate drug kingpin, lacing all manner of recreational drugs with a pathogen that, if no antidote is given, will drive drug users mad and ultimately kill them. The goons who work for Poppy all have their fingerprints removed, their teeth smoothed down, and a circle of gold (hence the movie's title) seared and bonded to their skin. Poppy blackmails the US president (Greenwood), demanding that he legalize all drugs and give Poppy total immunity. Poppy's goal is, apparently, to maintain her monopoly on the global drug trade, funneling profits through the major world governments, which will act as the regulators of all drugs (that's my guess about Poppy's motives and methods; the movie didn't seem too clear on this rather important point). The US president, meanwhile, is delighted at the thought of killing off all drug users at once, so he pretends to go along with Poppy's demands, but in reality, he simply wants all drug users to die: "No drug users, no drug trade!" he says, as he plans to wait Poppy out. Our heroes, the Kingsmen and the Statesmen, must do what they can to make sure that innocent people aren't killed, so they take it upon themselves to preempt the global release of Poppy's antidote. When Hart/Galahad finally gets his memory back, the superspies head for Italy, where Poppy's antidote is being manufactured. Along for the ride is Whiskey (Pascal), who wields a lasso like a ninja and has a deadly, electrified bullwhip that would make Indiana Jones green with envy.
Eggsy's personal motivation in all this is that he's now in a relationship with Crown Princess Tilde, the butt-sex-loving Swedish beauty he met in the first film. Tilde and Eggsy are on the rocks because Eggsy, out of a sense of honor, confesses to Tilde that he's on a mission that may require him to have sex with another woman in order to gain information that could potentially save the world. Tilde is understandably upset, and somewhere along the line, she turns to drugs... thereby infecting herself with Poppy's pathogen. The clock is now ticking for Eggsy, who is desperate to acquire and release the antidote to save Tilde.
I wanted to like "Golden Circle," but in the end, I felt it was noisy and nonsensical. There was simply too much going on that didn't make sense to me. An otherwise beautiful car chase at the beginning of the film is ruined by the bizarre fact that the bad guys, though heavily armed with mounted Gatling guns, don't deploy those guns until very late in the car chase. I also thought the depiction of the progression of the pathogen wasn't consistent. According to the story, an infected victim first develops blue veins, then goes through a manic dance phase, then becomes paralyzed as his muscles seize up, then dies when his eyes explode and blood gushes out of his nose. But we see victims who skip the manic phase altogether, and others who never seem to be paralyzed. When the epidemic nature of the pathogen is discovered, the president orders a massive quarantine; this results in a ludicrous scene in which infected people are placed in individual cages that are then stacked atop each other, hundreds of people high, thousands of people across. I had to wonder: what happens when someone in a cage wants to shit? With all that shit raining downward thanks to gravity, the lowest cages would be a hell of ever-rising excrement. Victims would drown in shit long before their eyeballs had a chance to explode. And here's a story-logic problem pointed out by my coworker: if Poppy was savvy enough to target Kingsman so thoroughly with her missiles, why didn't she do the same thing to Statesman?
Tonally, the film is all over the place. This was true of the first movie as well, but the first movie did a better job of juggling the manic, the satirical, the parodic, and the sentimental. "Golden Circle" never quite finds the right balance, and even though the film has a couple decent character moments, the overall effect lacks emotional coherence.
That said, Vaughn is still good at delivering over-the-top fight scenes that are comically unreal but easy to follow. My hat is off to all the stuntmen involved in the production. Pedro Pascal is particularly notable for the same feline grace that he brought to his brief role as the ill-fated Red Viper in "Game of Thrones." He somehow manages to channel a cowboy, a ballet dancer, and a martial artist at the same time. "Golden Circle" certainly doesn't lack for action.
And while I can't really recommend this sequel, I did like the constant US/UK ankle-kicking that characterized the interplay between the Yanks and the Brits. I also laughed at the movie's strange use of Elton John as a sort of stage prop, and I was tickled by the movie's final shot, which goes for the bizarrely incongruous: a well-established cowboy character (Tatum as Tequila) dressed as an English dandy and wearing a bowler hat.
"Kingsman: The Golden Circle" is, as I said, noisy and nonsensical. I think you might actually have to be on drugs in order to enjoy it fully. I also wasn't sure what message the movie was trying to send regarding drug use. Personally, I side with the evil Poppy when it comes to legalization; I actually think that that's the way to go, and drugs are something that, in my opinion, the US government should regulate. It could pay down its massive debt in just a few years if it controlled this vice. The heroes in the movie also seem to be pro-drug use, which makes me wonder what, exactly, the conflict with the villain is all about. Only the US president comes off looking truly evil: as a druggie-hating moral tightass, he has no problem with genocide-level mass death. (I heard the movie had originally been laced with tons of anti-Trump jokes, but those all got stripped out in favor of something more likely to appeal to the hoi polloi.) The whole story is a confused jumble, and any message the movie might have had is lost in the screenwriters' addled mental convolutions.
If you do decide to see this movie, turn your brain off first.
Director Matthew Vaughn is at it again in 2017's "Kingsman: The Golden Circle," which stars Taron Egerton, Mark Strong, Halle Berry, Pedro Pascal, Jeff Bridges, Channing Tatum, Hanna Alström, Colin Firth (yes, Galahad is back), Julianne Moore and, bizarrely, Elton John. Guest stars include Michael Gambon, Sophie Cookson, and Bruce Greenwood (Captain Pike in the JJ Abrams "Star Trek" movies).
The movie opens, hilariously, with a Scots bagpipe version of John Denver's "Country Roads"—a comic move that will, sadly, turn out to be a clever bit of foreshadowing in a movie that generally lacks clever moments. We meet Eggsy (Egerton) right away, and we see him conversing with Roxy (Cookson) and the new Arthur (Gambon) who now heads up Kingsman. Not long after that, a brace of missiles destroys all branches of Kingsman, killing Arthur, Roxy, and every Kingsman operative aside from Merlin (Strong) and Eggsy. This event prompts Merlin to activate the Doomsday Protocol, which sends the two remaining British superspies to America, where they meet the cowboyish Statesmen—the Yankee counterpart to the Kingsmen. This doesn't go well at first: when they sneak into the Statesman compound in Kentucky, Merlin and Eggsy (who is using Galahad's handle since Colin Firth's Galahad is presumably dead) are handily defeated by Tequila (Tatum), who captures the Brits and reveals that the Statesmen have Harry Hart, the senior Galahad (Firth), who was saved from his gunshot to the head in the previous movie by alpha gel—a nanotech product designed to rescue victims of head shots. Alpha gel is injected into the gunshot wound, and nanobots enter the wound and immediately begin stabilizing the victim and repairing bone and tissue damage. But Hart/Galahad is far from whole: his brain damage has led to a deep-seated amnesia, and attempts to trigger his old memories have, up to now, failed.
Meanwhile, hiding out in the jungles of Cambodia, dainty, Fifties-nostalgia-loving Poppy Adams (Moore) has made herself into the ultimate drug kingpin, lacing all manner of recreational drugs with a pathogen that, if no antidote is given, will drive drug users mad and ultimately kill them. The goons who work for Poppy all have their fingerprints removed, their teeth smoothed down, and a circle of gold (hence the movie's title) seared and bonded to their skin. Poppy blackmails the US president (Greenwood), demanding that he legalize all drugs and give Poppy total immunity. Poppy's goal is, apparently, to maintain her monopoly on the global drug trade, funneling profits through the major world governments, which will act as the regulators of all drugs (that's my guess about Poppy's motives and methods; the movie didn't seem too clear on this rather important point). The US president, meanwhile, is delighted at the thought of killing off all drug users at once, so he pretends to go along with Poppy's demands, but in reality, he simply wants all drug users to die: "No drug users, no drug trade!" he says, as he plans to wait Poppy out. Our heroes, the Kingsmen and the Statesmen, must do what they can to make sure that innocent people aren't killed, so they take it upon themselves to preempt the global release of Poppy's antidote. When Hart/Galahad finally gets his memory back, the superspies head for Italy, where Poppy's antidote is being manufactured. Along for the ride is Whiskey (Pascal), who wields a lasso like a ninja and has a deadly, electrified bullwhip that would make Indiana Jones green with envy.
Eggsy's personal motivation in all this is that he's now in a relationship with Crown Princess Tilde, the butt-sex-loving Swedish beauty he met in the first film. Tilde and Eggsy are on the rocks because Eggsy, out of a sense of honor, confesses to Tilde that he's on a mission that may require him to have sex with another woman in order to gain information that could potentially save the world. Tilde is understandably upset, and somewhere along the line, she turns to drugs... thereby infecting herself with Poppy's pathogen. The clock is now ticking for Eggsy, who is desperate to acquire and release the antidote to save Tilde.
I wanted to like "Golden Circle," but in the end, I felt it was noisy and nonsensical. There was simply too much going on that didn't make sense to me. An otherwise beautiful car chase at the beginning of the film is ruined by the bizarre fact that the bad guys, though heavily armed with mounted Gatling guns, don't deploy those guns until very late in the car chase. I also thought the depiction of the progression of the pathogen wasn't consistent. According to the story, an infected victim first develops blue veins, then goes through a manic dance phase, then becomes paralyzed as his muscles seize up, then dies when his eyes explode and blood gushes out of his nose. But we see victims who skip the manic phase altogether, and others who never seem to be paralyzed. When the epidemic nature of the pathogen is discovered, the president orders a massive quarantine; this results in a ludicrous scene in which infected people are placed in individual cages that are then stacked atop each other, hundreds of people high, thousands of people across. I had to wonder: what happens when someone in a cage wants to shit? With all that shit raining downward thanks to gravity, the lowest cages would be a hell of ever-rising excrement. Victims would drown in shit long before their eyeballs had a chance to explode. And here's a story-logic problem pointed out by my coworker: if Poppy was savvy enough to target Kingsman so thoroughly with her missiles, why didn't she do the same thing to Statesman?
Tonally, the film is all over the place. This was true of the first movie as well, but the first movie did a better job of juggling the manic, the satirical, the parodic, and the sentimental. "Golden Circle" never quite finds the right balance, and even though the film has a couple decent character moments, the overall effect lacks emotional coherence.
That said, Vaughn is still good at delivering over-the-top fight scenes that are comically unreal but easy to follow. My hat is off to all the stuntmen involved in the production. Pedro Pascal is particularly notable for the same feline grace that he brought to his brief role as the ill-fated Red Viper in "Game of Thrones." He somehow manages to channel a cowboy, a ballet dancer, and a martial artist at the same time. "Golden Circle" certainly doesn't lack for action.
And while I can't really recommend this sequel, I did like the constant US/UK ankle-kicking that characterized the interplay between the Yanks and the Brits. I also laughed at the movie's strange use of Elton John as a sort of stage prop, and I was tickled by the movie's final shot, which goes for the bizarrely incongruous: a well-established cowboy character (Tatum as Tequila) dressed as an English dandy and wearing a bowler hat.
"Kingsman: The Golden Circle" is, as I said, noisy and nonsensical. I think you might actually have to be on drugs in order to enjoy it fully. I also wasn't sure what message the movie was trying to send regarding drug use. Personally, I side with the evil Poppy when it comes to legalization; I actually think that that's the way to go, and drugs are something that, in my opinion, the US government should regulate. It could pay down its massive debt in just a few years if it controlled this vice. The heroes in the movie also seem to be pro-drug use, which makes me wonder what, exactly, the conflict with the villain is all about. Only the US president comes off looking truly evil: as a druggie-hating moral tightass, he has no problem with genocide-level mass death. (I heard the movie had originally been laced with tons of anti-Trump jokes, but those all got stripped out in favor of something more likely to appeal to the hoi polloi.) The whole story is a confused jumble, and any message the movie might have had is lost in the screenwriters' addled mental convolutions.
If you do decide to see this movie, turn your brain off first.
Monday, October 23, 2017
watch this space
A review for "Kingsman: The Golden Circle" is coming soon. Sorry for no blogging on Sunday, but Sunday was, except for the movie, pretty much a nothing day, and today has started off as a real pisser because the repairman who was supposed to fix my Net connection never fucking showed up. I waited nearly four hours for the guy and got into a testy email exchange with our retarded HR department, then decided to just walk to work. Once I cool down and get some actual work done, I'll bang out a review. Veuillez patienter, s'il vous plaît.
(A post about my Net situation might show up first, though. My blog is my venting space.)
(A post about my Net situation might show up first, though. My blog is my venting space.)
Saturday, October 21, 2017
cinematography!
You may recall that, in my recent review of "Blade Runner 2049," I mentioned the great Roger Deakins, who has made a name for himself as the go-to cinematographer for some of the best-known movies out there. Over at the Crash Course channel on YouTube, a new video on cinematography just surfaced, and I think it's worth a look-see.
I'll be seeing "Kingsman: The Golden Circle" tomorrow morning, so expect another review sometime in the next day or two.
I'll be seeing "Kingsman: The Golden Circle" tomorrow morning, so expect another review sometime in the next day or two.
Friday, October 20, 2017
Thursday, October 19, 2017
Net woes
For the past three days, my internet connectivity has gone to shite. I've tried all the fixes I know (admittedly not that many), but the time has come to call in a specialist to see what the hell is going on. I'll be doing that this morning, before I head out for work.
More updates soon.
UPDATE 1: the problem may be with the ancient modem to which I originally attached my computer. The modem was already in my apartment when I moved in. It has four lights on it that tell you the modem's status: power, link, data, and LAN. The LAN light is out, and my MacBook Air laptop was sending me confusing messages earlier today, e.g., that there was no internet connection even though some websites were loading on my browser. I suspect the lack of Net connection comes from the lack of LAN. I had also had a router attached to my computer setup, and that led to the paradoxical message that I had a strong Wi-Fi signal but no Wi-Fi connection. Something is definitely Not Right. The modem has a customer-service number printed on its underside, but the number is no longer in existence. The modem's manufacturer, Tellion, has a website, but when I tried the number listed on the website, that also failed to lead to anything. Given how old the modem is, I suspect Tellion no longer exists.
Anyway, I've written a long email in Korean to my company's HR department. A coworker in my office recently had almost exactly the same problem, and HR helped her by sending a repairman who simply replaced the recalcitrant modem with a new one. I'm hoping that, if I get a new modem, it'll lead to much faster internet-connection speeds than what I've had thus far. My ancient apartment building's Net connectivity has been molasses-slow since I've been here; several trips to Speedtest.net have confirmed this.
UPDATE 2: the HR department will be sending someone to my place on Monday, so I can look forward to three more days without internet.
More updates soon.
UPDATE 1: the problem may be with the ancient modem to which I originally attached my computer. The modem was already in my apartment when I moved in. It has four lights on it that tell you the modem's status: power, link, data, and LAN. The LAN light is out, and my MacBook Air laptop was sending me confusing messages earlier today, e.g., that there was no internet connection even though some websites were loading on my browser. I suspect the lack of Net connection comes from the lack of LAN. I had also had a router attached to my computer setup, and that led to the paradoxical message that I had a strong Wi-Fi signal but no Wi-Fi connection. Something is definitely Not Right. The modem has a customer-service number printed on its underside, but the number is no longer in existence. The modem's manufacturer, Tellion, has a website, but when I tried the number listed on the website, that also failed to lead to anything. Given how old the modem is, I suspect Tellion no longer exists.
Anyway, I've written a long email in Korean to my company's HR department. A coworker in my office recently had almost exactly the same problem, and HR helped her by sending a repairman who simply replaced the recalcitrant modem with a new one. I'm hoping that, if I get a new modem, it'll lead to much faster internet-connection speeds than what I've had thus far. My ancient apartment building's Net connectivity has been molasses-slow since I've been here; several trips to Speedtest.net have confirmed this.
UPDATE 2: the HR department will be sending someone to my place on Monday, so I can look forward to three more days without internet.
Wednesday, October 18, 2017
can too much exercise kill you?
A recent Chicago study apparently concludes that too much exercise can be deadly:
It's almost circular to say that "too much" exercise can kill you: the moment you use the modifier too, you are, by definition, talking about something that passes a boundary, moving you from modesty to excess, or from safety to danger. So of course too much exercise can kill you: too much of anything can kill you. Viewed in that way, the article isn't saying anything revolutionary. The racial differences pointed out by the article are interesting, however, as is the number of hours per week defining the deadly threshold for exercise.
I walk about 3.5 hours per day, but I haven't been to the gym in weeks, so I'm not sure that all my walking qualifies as "too much" exercise.
Too much exercise can kill you, scientists have revealed.
White men who work out at least seven-and-a-half hours a week are nearly twice as likely to suffer from heart disease than those who do a moderate amount, a new study shows.
Researchers in Chicago assessed exercise patterns over the course of 25 years and made the surprising discovery that very active white men are 86 percent more likely to experience a buildup of plaque in the heart arteries by middle age.
But this didn't apply to black men, they discovered.
It was suggested high levels of exercise over time caused stress on the arteries leading to higher coronary artery calcification - CAC.
However scientists warned people should not stop exercising.
The team from the University of Illinois at Chicago and Kaiser Permanente looked at the physical activity trajectories of 3,175 black and white participants in the longterm CARDIA study and assessed the presence of CAC.
The presence and amount of CAC, is a significant warning sign to doctors that a patient may be at risk for developing heart disease and a signal to consider early preventive care.
Dr Deepika Laddu, assistant professor of physical therapy in the UIC College of Applied Health Sciences, said: 'We expected to see that higher levels of physical activity over time would be associated with lower levels of CAC.'
However they found that at the top level of exercise, there was no extra risk for black men, but an 86 percent increased risk for white men.
Unique to the new study is the evaluation of long-term exercise patterns, from young adulthood into middle age.
It's almost circular to say that "too much" exercise can kill you: the moment you use the modifier too, you are, by definition, talking about something that passes a boundary, moving you from modesty to excess, or from safety to danger. So of course too much exercise can kill you: too much of anything can kill you. Viewed in that way, the article isn't saying anything revolutionary. The racial differences pointed out by the article are interesting, however, as is the number of hours per week defining the deadly threshold for exercise.
I walk about 3.5 hours per day, but I haven't been to the gym in weeks, so I'm not sure that all my walking qualifies as "too much" exercise.
funny how that works
The more you try digging into Trump, the more it seems to blow up in your face.
BOMBSHELL REVELATIONS ABOUT RUSSIA AND OBAMA’S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
The Other Russia Scandal
Russia Tables Turn
New Documents Show Clinton-Russia Scandal Dwarfs Anything on Trump’s Side
And finally, Styx:
Please do keep hammering the Russia thing, guys.
BOMBSHELL REVELATIONS ABOUT RUSSIA AND OBAMA’S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
The Other Russia Scandal
Russia Tables Turn
New Documents Show Clinton-Russia Scandal Dwarfs Anything on Trump’s Side
And finally, Styx:
Please do keep hammering the Russia thing, guys.
Tuesday, October 17, 2017
le grand fuckup*
I know that French authorities are normally better than this, but this is a point-and-laugh kind of moment:
"French intelligence texts jihadist by mistake, inadvertently warning of surveillance operation"
*In this context, the French would most likely use a term like "connerie" to describe a major fuckup. (This is also why the French giggle whenever they hear the name "Sean Connery.") There may be worse terms, but I'm not up on my French slang.
"French intelligence texts jihadist by mistake, inadvertently warning of surveillance operation"
A French intelligence agent sent a text message by mistake to the mobile phone of a jihadist, inadvertently warning him that he was under surveillance and undermining an investigation, it emerged on Friday.
The target of the probe, described as an “Islamist preacher” based in the Paris area, immediately understood that his phone was being tapped and his movements monitored.
He called the agent to complain and warned his contacts that they were under surveillance. As a result, separate investigations by two different intelligence services came to nothing, M6 television reported.
“It was undoubtedly the worst mistake the agent ever made,” M6 commented. Interior ministry sources confirmed the report.
The intelligence officer had meant to send the text to a colleague last Saturday. It contained information about the Islamist and the progress of the investigation.
It was only when the Islamist decided to have some fun at the officer’s expense and phoned him minutes after he sent the text that he realised what he had done.
The two agencies involved, the Central Territorial Intelligence Service and the General Directorate for Internal Security, were furious over the mishap.
*In this context, the French would most likely use a term like "connerie" to describe a major fuckup. (This is also why the French giggle whenever they hear the name "Sean Connery.") There may be worse terms, but I'm not up on my French slang.
Monday, October 16, 2017
awful, but also stupid: your homework for today
Look up "Natalia Borodina death" on Google. Her death is tragic for her son, but the manner of her death should serve as a good moral lesson regarding parental responsibility (a mother's first obligation is to keep herself alive) and the superficial flaunting of one's bodily assets.
Another sad convergence of Darwin Award and Instant Karma.
Another sad convergence of Darwin Award and Instant Karma.
Sunday, October 15, 2017
"Blade Runner 2049": review
[NB: NO SPOILERS.]
Québecois director Denis Villeneuve has earned my trust. I've seen and reviewed his films "Sicario" and "Arrival," and while I didn't find either of those films to be perfect, I found Villeneuve himself to be a competent director who is rapidly earning a name for himself as the Sam Mendes of science fiction. That's good news for those who like brooding, thoughtful, slowly paced productions; it's not so good news for people expecting the sequel to 1982's "Blade Runner" to receive the JJ Abrams treatment. (I'm already on record as saying that Sam Mendes has been the kiss of death for the James Bond franchise, but that's because I don't think Bond movies should be sleepy, moody soap operas.) Villeneuve is a good match for what the story of "Blade Runner 2049" is: an exploration of what it means to be human.
It's no spoiler to note at the outset that star Ryan Gosling plays K, a blade runner working for the LAPD who is also a new, more pliant generation of replicant (relax: K's replicant status is established within the first few minutes). K's job is to "retire" (i.e., kill) older-generation replicants—"androids" that can pass for human. K stumbles upon a truth that, if allowed to reach the public, might lead to a replicant revolution, and he pursues the mystery behind this truth. This is what drives the film.
The plot takes the form of a literal journey for K, leading him through a variety of atmospheric settings ranging from the familiar urban blight of L.A.—not much changed from the first film—to a vast junkyard in San Diego, and eventually to the ruins of Las Vegas. While seemingly simple and linear, the plot has a few built-in twists, one of which is a massive head-fake that I found reminiscent of the twist at the end of "The Dark Knight Rises."
"2049" evokes other movies and TV shows as well, especially "Battlestar Galactica," which trod very similar philosophical turf (cf. Athena and Hera from that show). In both "2049" and "Battlestar," it could well be that the term "android" is a misnomer, as the replicants (or Cylons) in question are similar to humans at the molecular level, not mere constructs of metal and plastic and silicone. One of the major tropes in the new film is intelligent simulacra, running the gamut from artificial animals (you'll recall these appeared in the first film) to an artificial girlfriend, the latter of which leads us to one of the most uncomfortably weird prelude-to-sex scenes I've ever seen in a movie (shades of Spike Jonze's "Her").
Harrison Ford's Rick Deckard, when we finally meet him, is a bit of a paradox: his presence is absolutely crucial to the plot, but he comes off as largely feckless. That said, Ford plays the role with a grizzled soulfulness that adds layers to the performance he gave in the first movie. "2049" also features a cameo by Edward James Olmos as Gaff, who's still making his origami animals, and another cameo by an uncanny simulacrum of 80s-era Sean Young (Young was involved mainly as a consultant; otherwise, her on-screen presence was evoked the same way the late Peter Cushing's was in "Rogue One," i.e., via digital motion capture).
We get a solid performance from Robin Wright as Lt. Joshi; the previews make her seem like one of the bad guys, but the truth is more complicated. Dave Bautista—as "protein farmer" Sapper Morton, a former military medic—once again proves he's got actual acting chops and isn't just a mass of muscle who grunts for the camera. Ana de Armas, as K's holographic girlfriend Joi, is both winsome and emotionally sophisticated. Joi asks us to ponder the question of just how human an AI can become. Sylvia Hoeks is all beauty and deadly menace as Luv, the right-hand aide/assassin working for Wallace, played by Jared Leto. This was, I think, the first time I had ever watched Leto at length, and I came away thinking of him as a fine, nuanced actor. His Wallace heads up the Wallace Corporation, which bought out the Tyrell Corporation (from the first film) and took over the engineering of replicants.
The musical score for "2049" comes to us by way of Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch; the soundtrack is mainly a homage to the music of Vangelis from the 1982 movie, which means that Zimmer was kept from foisting some of his more annoying musical tendencies on the audience. (I thought Vangelis's score was quite good, except for those moments when he went over the top with the damn saxophone during the awkwardly rapey "romance" scene between Deckard and Rachael.) I was actually surprised to learn that Villeneuve's normal collaborator, nutty composer Jóhann Jóhannsson, wasn't involved with "2049." The scuttlebutt is that Jóhannsson had originally been signed on, but he was dropped in favor of Zimmer, et al., and was forbidden to comment on the matter. In any event, the score does a good job of evoking the mood of the first film, and the final scenes of the movie give us a direct tribute to Vangelis's work. While I don't think this soundtrack is as memorable as the one from thirty-five years ago (has it really been that long?), it's serviceable.
Now we come to the matter of cinematographer Roger Deakins. If you've read the online chatter and watched some videos associated with "2049," you'll have seen or heard Deakins's name come up in discussion. The man is considered a god in Hollywood, and I'd have to agree that his evocative visuals are more than half of what makes the movie. "2049" definitely deserves to be seen on a big screen, so do catch it in theaters if you can. Deakins has, unsurprisingly, worked with the above-mentioned Sam Mendes; he has also collaborated with the Coen Brothers on their films. He brings a rich color palette to "2049" that instantly calls forth the appropriate mood.
Overall, I recommend "Blade Runner 2049" if you're into movies that thoughtfully chew over big issues like the meaning of being human, even if "Battlestar Galactica" got there first and explored almost exactly the same question, in almost exactly the same way, just a few years ago. Watch the movie for the strong direction and performances, for Roger Deakins's visual stylings, and for a story that seems to be headed in one direction but suddenly swerves left and heads in another. Does the film settle the question of whether Rick Deckard is himself a replicant? I suppose you'll just have to watch the film and draw your own conclusions.
Saturday, October 14, 2017
Harvey Weinstein's inadvertent dragnet
As the Harvey Weinstein scandal continues to explode, more and more male Hollywood stars are being dragged into the spotlight as sexual harassers themselves, or as people who helped quash accusations of harassment. Among them: Ben and Casey Affleck, their buddy Matt Damon, George Clooney (and much of the male cast of the early "ER," including Anthony Edwards, Noah Wyle, and Eriq La Salle), and now even Seth Rogen. As I've said before, there's little reason to be surprised at how truly dirty Hollywood is. My only practical question is whether any actual good is going to come out of this mess. Will sexual harassment in Hollywood begin to wane as a result of all this negative exposure, or will this end up being a mere kerfuffle that blows over, allowing things to go back to "normal"?
a tantalizing review of "Blade Runner 2049"
With no spoilers! Enjoy.
By the way, I watched "Blade Runner: The Final Cut" a few days ago in preparation for my upcoming viewing of "2049."
By the way, I watched "Blade Runner: The Final Cut" a few days ago in preparation for my upcoming viewing of "2049."
aspirin recall
If someone can find a news article about this in either the English-language or Korean-language news sources, I'd be grateful, but from what I understand after having spoken with the staff of two different pharmacies, there has been an aspirin recall in Korea, which is why you can't currently buy aspirin in any of the pharmacies. This has been going on for months, and possibly as long as a year. I didn't know about this, mainly because I had been buying my aspirin from Haddon Supermarket, but it seems that Haddon is now defunct: I went there on Friday morning and found the place shuttered. Because I was confused about how no aspirin at all is available, I asked my favorite pharmacist today (she works in the Mido Building, where I used to work) whether there was only one brand of aspirin sold in Korea: I reasoned that a total recall wouldn't be necessary if several competing brands were available. Sure enough, the pharmacist confirmed that only Bayer aspirin is sold at all pharmacies throughout the country. A bad batch of aspirin was manufactured (in country, I assume) and distributed; when it was discovered that the batch was bad, a recall was instituted, and the government halted aspirin manufacture. That's where things stand now, and the pharmacist didn't know when aspirin would return to the shelves.
This is a very good example of what happens when you don't allow for free-market solutions. If Koreans had had the choice among several brands of aspirin, each manufactured at its own respective facility, there would have been no nationwide recall of all available aspirin: consumers could have simply switched, temporarily, to another brand. As it stands, the situation is almost funny unless you've got a severe headache.
UPDATE: I found this Korean-language article on the recall. If you run it through Google Translate, the English is surprisingly clear, although I can't vouch for its fidelity.
This is a very good example of what happens when you don't allow for free-market solutions. If Koreans had had the choice among several brands of aspirin, each manufactured at its own respective facility, there would have been no nationwide recall of all available aspirin: consumers could have simply switched, temporarily, to another brand. As it stands, the situation is almost funny unless you've got a severe headache.
UPDATE: I found this Korean-language article on the recall. If you run it through Google Translate, the English is surprisingly clear, although I can't vouch for its fidelity.
barrier broken: 115.0 kg
[NOW UPDATED!]
This morning, I weighed myself and came in at 115.0 kg, which means I've finally broken through the unbreakable 116-kilo floor that has plagued me for so long. You'll recall that I reached 116 kg (down from 126 kg) back in mid-May, at the end of my Seoul-Busan walk. I regained some weight over the ensuing months, but I managed to keep from regaining everything I had lost, never going up further than 119 kg. For the past several weeks, I've been fluctuating somewhere in the 116-118-kg region, and this week, thanks to a bit of fasting plus continued creekside-staircase exercise, I finally got down to today's weight. This is good news because I'm now off to see the doc, so maybe I'll have some (good?) blood-pressure and blood-sugar numbers to slap up later today. Fingers and tentacles crossed.
In other news: I'm working a full eight hours today, then I'll be seeing "Blade Runner 2049" either tonight or tomorrow morning.
NB: earlier, this post announced "115.5 kg" as my new weight, but I've been exuberantly diarrhetic this morning, so when I weighed myself again just now, 115.0 was the new weight. This just goes to show you how much your weight can fluctuate thanks to liquids, so yes, I'm mindful of the fact that my new weight might be only the most temporary of losses, and that it might not represent true fat loss.
UPDATE: back from the doc, and while my blood-sugar numbers were so-so at 160 (the doc said this was "okay" for someone of my size and current state of health, who has eaten breakfast, but I suspect that 160 is the very, very high end of "okay"; see more here), my blood pressure turned out to be the lowest it's ever been: 120/75. That's healthier than a horse, so of course I'm celebrating by having pizza and Coke for lunch. I'll be back to exercising tomorrow or Monday. For the moment, though, I must party.
This morning, I weighed myself and came in at 115.0 kg, which means I've finally broken through the unbreakable 116-kilo floor that has plagued me for so long. You'll recall that I reached 116 kg (down from 126 kg) back in mid-May, at the end of my Seoul-Busan walk. I regained some weight over the ensuing months, but I managed to keep from regaining everything I had lost, never going up further than 119 kg. For the past several weeks, I've been fluctuating somewhere in the 116-118-kg region, and this week, thanks to a bit of fasting plus continued creekside-staircase exercise, I finally got down to today's weight. This is good news because I'm now off to see the doc, so maybe I'll have some (good?) blood-pressure and blood-sugar numbers to slap up later today. Fingers and tentacles crossed.
In other news: I'm working a full eight hours today, then I'll be seeing "Blade Runner 2049" either tonight or tomorrow morning.
NB: earlier, this post announced "115.5 kg" as my new weight, but I've been exuberantly diarrhetic this morning, so when I weighed myself again just now, 115.0 was the new weight. This just goes to show you how much your weight can fluctuate thanks to liquids, so yes, I'm mindful of the fact that my new weight might be only the most temporary of losses, and that it might not represent true fat loss.
UPDATE: back from the doc, and while my blood-sugar numbers were so-so at 160 (the doc said this was "okay" for someone of my size and current state of health, who has eaten breakfast, but I suspect that 160 is the very, very high end of "okay"; see more here), my blood pressure turned out to be the lowest it's ever been: 120/75. That's healthier than a horse, so of course I'm celebrating by having pizza and Coke for lunch. I'll be back to exercising tomorrow or Monday. For the moment, though, I must party.
Friday, October 13, 2017
ugh
This is a porg. It will be prominently featured in this December's "Star Wars: The Last Jedi."
Kill me now.
One of the great virtues of "Rogue One" was that there were no fucking cute aliens. Instead, there was a tentacled, Lovecraftian horror called Bor Gullet whose mind-melding technique could drive you insane. My kind of alien.
ADDENDUM: porg memes are popping up all over the Net. Here's a good one:
Two more amusing porg memes:
Kill me now.
One of the great virtues of "Rogue One" was that there were no fucking cute aliens. Instead, there was a tentacled, Lovecraftian horror called Bor Gullet whose mind-melding technique could drive you insane. My kind of alien.
ADDENDUM: porg memes are popping up all over the Net. Here's a good one:
Two more amusing porg memes:
Thursday, October 12, 2017
"mindfulness" is bullshit
If the concept of mindfulness isn't utter bullshit, then it is, at the very least, overhyped—or so argues this article, titled "'Mindfulness' Is a Meaningless Word with Shoddy Science Behind It." A taste:
My advice, when it comes to Zen meditation, at least, is just to keep things simple and truncate any lofty expectations. Zen, in the literature, often refers to itself as "nothing special," which is a crucial point to remember. Don't go to meditation looking for miracles. It's just sitting, after all—the attainment (or maybe the non-attainment!) of "ordinary mind."
(My essay on Zen meditation is here.)
The benefits of meditation may have been seriously overhyped, a group of psychologists, neuroscientists, Buddhist scholars and mindfulness teachers warn—and the evidence to support mindfulness as a treatment certainly has been.
A new study by a multidisciplinary group of researchers at several universities calls out the "misinformation and propagation of poor research methodology" that pervade much of the evidence behind the benefits of mindfulness. They focus in particular on the problem of defining the word mindfulness and on how the effects of the practice are studied.
[...]
Much of the research around meditation and mindfulness has serious flaws, the authors state. Among those flaws: using various definitions for mindfulness, not comparing results to a control group of people who did not meditate and not using good measurements for mindfulness.
"I'll admit to [having drunk] the Kool-Aid a bit myself. I’m a practicing meditator, and I have been for over 20 years," David Vago told Newsweek. A research director at the Osher Center for Integrative Medicine at Vanderbilt University, he is one of the study's authors. "A lot of the data that's out there is still premature," he said.
The revelation is particularly disconcerting in light of how big of a business meditation has become. A veritable industry, the practice brings in around $1 billion annually, according to Fortune. That industry includes apps, classes and medical treatments.
My advice, when it comes to Zen meditation, at least, is just to keep things simple and truncate any lofty expectations. Zen, in the literature, often refers to itself as "nothing special," which is a crucial point to remember. Don't go to meditation looking for miracles. It's just sitting, after all—the attainment (or maybe the non-attainment!) of "ordinary mind."
(My essay on Zen meditation is here.)
good, stupid fun
Watch this dude try to damage a riot shield with various throwing weapons. I have to say: he's got a mean throwing arm (or arms: with some weapons, he throws two-handed). I wonder if some of those throws took several takes, or if the guy really is that good.
ADDENDUM: Adam Celadin, a Czech, turns out to be a champion knife thrower. So, yes: he really is that good.
ADDENDUM: Adam Celadin, a Czech, turns out to be a champion knife thrower. So, yes: he really is that good.
the not-so-mainstream view
Is Trump stupid? See here.
Is Trump a racist? See here.
The year is coming to a close, and I did say that I would give Trump a year before passing any sort of definitive judgment on the man. A quick preview of my thoughts, which I'll flesh out more fully in late January, would be something along the lines of: he's not the reincarnation of Hitler, nor is he the clown/idiot that the left makes him out to be. That said, he doesn't pass the beer test, and in a few months, I'll explain why.
Is Trump a racist? See here.
The year is coming to a close, and I did say that I would give Trump a year before passing any sort of definitive judgment on the man. A quick preview of my thoughts, which I'll flesh out more fully in late January, would be something along the lines of: he's not the reincarnation of Hitler, nor is he the clown/idiot that the left makes him out to be. That said, he doesn't pass the beer test, and in a few months, I'll explain why.
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
Hollywood, Weinstein, and the epic Twitter rant
Wow. Just read the whole thing.
Some perspective: the rant is epic, but if you're already cynical about what a fucking cesspit Hollywood is, then the rant doesn't really tell you anything new. I came away just wishing the dude would get it over with and name some damn names—blow this wide open and expose everyone for the frauds they are. (Again: such exposure won't tell us anything new, but we'll at least experience the Schadenfreude that comes with shining a harsh light on vermin and watching them scurry desperately back into the darkness.)
ADDENDUM: do read the comments, many of which take the ranter down a peg or three.
Some perspective: the rant is epic, but if you're already cynical about what a fucking cesspit Hollywood is, then the rant doesn't really tell you anything new. I came away just wishing the dude would get it over with and name some damn names—blow this wide open and expose everyone for the frauds they are. (Again: such exposure won't tell us anything new, but we'll at least experience the Schadenfreude that comes with shining a harsh light on vermin and watching them scurry desperately back into the darkness.)
ADDENDUM: do read the comments, many of which take the ranter down a peg or three.
"Baby Driver": review
"Baby Driver" is a 2017 action-comedy-romance-thriller directed by Edgar Wright (of Cornetto Trilogy fame) and starring Ansel Elgort, Kevin Spacey, Lily James, Eiza González, Jon Hamm, Jamie Foxx, and Jon Bernthal (lately seen in Marvel's "The Punisher" TV series). Elgort plays a talented getaway driver nicknamed Baby. Baby has a black foster father named Joseph (CJ Jones), with whom Baby communicates via sign language. Joseph is confined to a wheelchair and has a reached a point in his life where Baby now takes care of him. Baby works for crime boss Doc (Spacey), who plans and executes a series of bank heists—always with a different team of robbers, but always with Baby as the driver. This shows us the degree to which Doc trusts Baby. Baby, meanwhile, stores his ever-growing pile of cash under the floorboards of Joseph's residence as Joseph looks on sadly.
Much of the movie is devoted, albeit implicitly, to the idea of burning off bad karma: Baby's foster dad thinks Baby should leave the criminal world he's in; Baby is fantastic at what he does, but he's also basically a good kid who could be aiming higher in life. On the other side is Doc, the devil on Baby's shoulder, promising Baby the high life if the young man continues to be Doc's driver. Baby works for Doc because he's indebted to him, but even after paying off his debt, Baby is still Doc's darling, and there are consequences to saying no to Doc. And even if Baby manages to free himself from Doc's clutches, there's still his criminal past to reckon with.
The main artistic conceit of "Baby Driver" is, as so many reviewers have already pointed out, that the movie is filmed in the syncopated manner of a music video. A series of songs provides a pulse-pounding soundtrack that defines the rhythm of the action, and this style works well for the several car chases that punctuate the movie. For all the action, though, there are frequent lulls, and these are necessary so as not to overload the audience's senses. Some of the car chases—especially the one at the beginning of the movie—showcase some truly amazing stunt driving on the level of "Ronin" or "The French Connection." Artistically speaking, the movie is fun to watch and very engaging.
As a noir-ish romance, the movie works fairly well, but the film fails to answer the question of how a basically good kid got roped into a life of crime to begin with. All we know of Baby is that he's got debts to pay, and that he wants out, especially after he falls in love with diner waitress Debora (Lily James). The other element that makes the movie work is the cast: Jon Hamm and Jamie Foxx embody differing degrees of menace; Eiza González smoothly switches from feline grace to deadly fury. Kevin Spacey's Doc is strangely likable yet hard to read, which is, I think, the note that Spacey was going for. Doc ends up having more layers to him than seems obvious at first blush.
Wright doesn't build tension to Tarantino-ish levels, but he does film car chases expertly. While I didn't come away thinking that "Baby Driver" was the deepest of films, I thought it was entertaining enough. (I did, however, easily predict the death—and the manner of death—of one major character about a minute before it happened. While I got some satisfaction from detecting the telegraphed moment, I have to shake my finger at the director and screenwriter[s] for making the moment so obvious.) If you're in the mood for some watchable stunt driving with a bit of karmic metaphysics thrown in, this is your film.
Much of the movie is devoted, albeit implicitly, to the idea of burning off bad karma: Baby's foster dad thinks Baby should leave the criminal world he's in; Baby is fantastic at what he does, but he's also basically a good kid who could be aiming higher in life. On the other side is Doc, the devil on Baby's shoulder, promising Baby the high life if the young man continues to be Doc's driver. Baby works for Doc because he's indebted to him, but even after paying off his debt, Baby is still Doc's darling, and there are consequences to saying no to Doc. And even if Baby manages to free himself from Doc's clutches, there's still his criminal past to reckon with.
The main artistic conceit of "Baby Driver" is, as so many reviewers have already pointed out, that the movie is filmed in the syncopated manner of a music video. A series of songs provides a pulse-pounding soundtrack that defines the rhythm of the action, and this style works well for the several car chases that punctuate the movie. For all the action, though, there are frequent lulls, and these are necessary so as not to overload the audience's senses. Some of the car chases—especially the one at the beginning of the movie—showcase some truly amazing stunt driving on the level of "Ronin" or "The French Connection." Artistically speaking, the movie is fun to watch and very engaging.
As a noir-ish romance, the movie works fairly well, but the film fails to answer the question of how a basically good kid got roped into a life of crime to begin with. All we know of Baby is that he's got debts to pay, and that he wants out, especially after he falls in love with diner waitress Debora (Lily James). The other element that makes the movie work is the cast: Jon Hamm and Jamie Foxx embody differing degrees of menace; Eiza González smoothly switches from feline grace to deadly fury. Kevin Spacey's Doc is strangely likable yet hard to read, which is, I think, the note that Spacey was going for. Doc ends up having more layers to him than seems obvious at first blush.
Wright doesn't build tension to Tarantino-ish levels, but he does film car chases expertly. While I didn't come away thinking that "Baby Driver" was the deepest of films, I thought it was entertaining enough. (I did, however, easily predict the death—and the manner of death—of one major character about a minute before it happened. While I got some satisfaction from detecting the telegraphed moment, I have to shake my finger at the director and screenwriter[s] for making the moment so obvious.) If you're in the mood for some watchable stunt driving with a bit of karmic metaphysics thrown in, this is your film.
Tuesday, October 10, 2017
Nutella-and-Brie grilled-cheese sandwiches
These sandwiches weren't as good as I thought they'd be. I'm pretty sure I did everything right in preparing them, but the execution just didn't live up to the concept. Hélas.
Monday, October 09, 2017
"21 Jump Street" and "22 Jump Street": one-paragraph review
The movies "21 Jump Street" (2012) and "22 Jump Street" (2014) star Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill as former high-school enemies who become friends when they both decide to join the police force. Because they're still fairly young-looking, they get assigned to the Jump Street project, which involves going undercover and investigating schools where newfangled drugs have suddenly appeared (the guys infiltrate a high school in "21" and a university in "22"). Rapper Ice Cube plays the cops' perennially angry captain in both films, and the movies smuggle in some cameos by the original stars of the "21 Jump Street" TV series, including Johnny Depp, Peter DeLouise, and Richard Grieco. Both movies are throwbacks to 80s-style teen comedies, with a strong dash of stoner comedy in the mix. The sequel isn't as good or as funny as the original, but I appreciated the nudge-wink self-conscious humor of both scripts, which made it clear that the writers were well aware they were rebooting an old series for mainly cynical reasons. Hill and Tatum make for a good comic pairing, and while neither movie is particularly groundbreaking in its ideas, the scriptwriters do attempt to transcend, at least a little, the typical jock/nerd dichotomy that fueled so much 80s-era teen comedy. Both "Jump Street" films are slightly smarter than you'd expect them to be, and the action moves along at a healthy clip. Another bonus is the addition of wait-do-I-know-that-guy stars to the cast: Dave Franco—brother of James Franco—appears in "21," and Wyatt Russell—son of Kurt Russell—has a major role in "22." All in all, this wasn't a bad way to spend 221 minutes. I was thoroughly entertained, if not exactly enlightened.
Sunday, October 08, 2017
yesterday's trip to No Brand land
No Brand is the house brand of the Korean chain store eMart, which is something of an omnibus store along the lines of Walmart. While eMart has large stores, there are also small, scaled-down branches like the eMart Everyday in my building's basement. A coworker alerted me, a few weeks ago, to the fact that eMart also has a No Brand store over at Express Bus Terminal Station, so I finally went there yesterday to check it out.
The store's layout is very much like that of a Costco big-box store, but smaller, and the prices as are low as my coworker said they would be. I saw, for the first time ever, a reasonably sized rice cooker on sale for under W30,000; most appliance stores sell such cookers for almost double that price, or higher. The same went for certain pots and pans.
As I wandered up and down the aisles, I grabbed at certain items like ricotta cheese, No Brand cola (which my basement grocery no longer sells; No Brand cola has only half the sugar of regular Coke, but it's just as good of a drink, in my opinion), and a Nutella knockoff that I was curious to try. I also found what I had come there to find: No Brand grill franks, my old friends. They were hiding in one of the refrigerator sections, so I grabbed three packs' worth of franks and trotted over to the cashier.
The cashier's area was a bit of a rude awakening: the lady at the register asked me to remove my items from my shopping basket—a task that eMart employees normally do themselves. She also pointed to the area where I could pick out my own bags; from what I could see, only paper bags were available, which was a bit of a disappointment. Ah, well, I reasoned: you have to put your own items onto the conveyor belt and bag/box them yourself at Costco, so how is this any different? So I swallowed my pride and did what I was told.
And just like that, I was out of the store with my goodies. I'll have to go back and buy some other items, but at least the store had the hot dogs.
When I got home, I immediately opened up the faux Nutella: it turned out not to be bad at all, although I wish the store had sold the larger, Costco-sized tubs instead of the half-sized ones. Several months ago, I had seen a video for a decadent grilled Nutella-and-Brie sandwich that I'm now going to have to make. I think the No Brand Fauxtella will work just fine, although the texture isn't quite as smooth.
No Brand products tend to be hit-or-miss for me: sometimes, as with the Fauxtella and the hot dogs, they're a big hit. At other times, as with the No Brand Pringles and cheese-ball knockoffs, the results are fairly shitty (the ricotta turned out to be edible, but to have the gross consistency of elementary-school Elmer's paste). All in all, though, I'm fairly happy with my haul—especially when No Brand cola costs only W330 per can. That's cheap.
The store's layout is very much like that of a Costco big-box store, but smaller, and the prices as are low as my coworker said they would be. I saw, for the first time ever, a reasonably sized rice cooker on sale for under W30,000; most appliance stores sell such cookers for almost double that price, or higher. The same went for certain pots and pans.
As I wandered up and down the aisles, I grabbed at certain items like ricotta cheese, No Brand cola (which my basement grocery no longer sells; No Brand cola has only half the sugar of regular Coke, but it's just as good of a drink, in my opinion), and a Nutella knockoff that I was curious to try. I also found what I had come there to find: No Brand grill franks, my old friends. They were hiding in one of the refrigerator sections, so I grabbed three packs' worth of franks and trotted over to the cashier.
The cashier's area was a bit of a rude awakening: the lady at the register asked me to remove my items from my shopping basket—a task that eMart employees normally do themselves. She also pointed to the area where I could pick out my own bags; from what I could see, only paper bags were available, which was a bit of a disappointment. Ah, well, I reasoned: you have to put your own items onto the conveyor belt and bag/box them yourself at Costco, so how is this any different? So I swallowed my pride and did what I was told.
And just like that, I was out of the store with my goodies. I'll have to go back and buy some other items, but at least the store had the hot dogs.
When I got home, I immediately opened up the faux Nutella: it turned out not to be bad at all, although I wish the store had sold the larger, Costco-sized tubs instead of the half-sized ones. Several months ago, I had seen a video for a decadent grilled Nutella-and-Brie sandwich that I'm now going to have to make. I think the No Brand Fauxtella will work just fine, although the texture isn't quite as smooth.
No Brand products tend to be hit-or-miss for me: sometimes, as with the Fauxtella and the hot dogs, they're a big hit. At other times, as with the No Brand Pringles and cheese-ball knockoffs, the results are fairly shitty (the ricotta turned out to be edible, but to have the gross consistency of elementary-school Elmer's paste). All in all, though, I'm fairly happy with my haul—especially when No Brand cola costs only W330 per can. That's cheap.
out with the old
My mission to find a new bandanna to replace my old, faithful one was successful:
Today, I went to the Dongdaemun (East Gate) district, where you can find all sorts of clothes and clothing-related items. It was late on a Sunday afternoon; many of the stalls in the open market were already closed, but the big stores were still open, so I slipped into the crowded Migliore building, asked a convenience-store lady where the bandannas were, and escalatored my way up to the fifth floor. I found a handkerchief seller, but she said that, if I was looking for the truly large bandannas that you can wear on your head, I'd need to try a hat seller. So I found one, and sure enough, she had the black version of my current bandanna—or something that was close enough.
Now I'm good for another few years. Meanwhile, I'm thankful to my old bandanna for its faithful service, but I could tell that its time was at an end once the fabric began fraying and tearing not long after I had gotten back from my long walk. You'll note that, on Day 26 of that walk, there was no hole at all in the middle of my bandanna, which goes to show that the new holes represent a cascade failure in the fabric. This is the same way in which human beings who are in good physical shape die: they're healthy as horses until, one day, they're suddenly kaput when all their systems crash at the same time. If such people are lucky, this happens in their sleep. I'm not sure whether my old bandanna is now asleep, but it's certainly in or near the grave. I might get it patched up and use it until it really is just rags, but it may be better to go full-on "Blade Runner" and simply... retire it.
Today, I went to the Dongdaemun (East Gate) district, where you can find all sorts of clothes and clothing-related items. It was late on a Sunday afternoon; many of the stalls in the open market were already closed, but the big stores were still open, so I slipped into the crowded Migliore building, asked a convenience-store lady where the bandannas were, and escalatored my way up to the fifth floor. I found a handkerchief seller, but she said that, if I was looking for the truly large bandannas that you can wear on your head, I'd need to try a hat seller. So I found one, and sure enough, she had the black version of my current bandanna—or something that was close enough.
Now I'm good for another few years. Meanwhile, I'm thankful to my old bandanna for its faithful service, but I could tell that its time was at an end once the fabric began fraying and tearing not long after I had gotten back from my long walk. You'll note that, on Day 26 of that walk, there was no hole at all in the middle of my bandanna, which goes to show that the new holes represent a cascade failure in the fabric. This is the same way in which human beings who are in good physical shape die: they're healthy as horses until, one day, they're suddenly kaput when all their systems crash at the same time. If such people are lucky, this happens in their sleep. I'm not sure whether my old bandanna is now asleep, but it's certainly in or near the grave. I might get it patched up and use it until it really is just rags, but it may be better to go full-on "Blade Runner" and simply... retire it.
Saturday, October 07, 2017
calling all geography buffs
From a YouTube channel that I subscribe to, I learned of the existence of a fun site called Country Quiz. Go to the site, fill in your name (the site asks for no other information), then start playing. The idea is that you have to guess what country is being referred to. You're given two types of hints: one is visual; the other is lexical. The lexical hint comes in the form of, "This country's name has [X number of] letters in it." The visual hint comes in the form of a slew of photographs showing wildlife, landscape, people, and even flags. If you think you know the answer, type it in the space at the very bottom. I was able to get the first twelve challenges correct, all in a row, without cheating. After that winning streak, I lost my courage and left the site so I could enjoy my 100% record. Admittedly, some of the challenges are easy, e.g., when one photo shows you the leaning tower of Pisa, or another photo shows you the Taj Mahal. I loved the photo spread for South Africa, though; I was able to guess that country based on what I knew about its wildlife. That was a thrilling moment. (So was Mongolia, which I was able to guess thanks to all the pictures of steppe with mountains in the background, plus a shot of what was obviously the Gobi Desert.)
Go challenge yourself!
Go challenge yourself!
pardon the bloglessness
I've been spending the first day of my three-day weekend trying to stay off my still-aching feet, which means I've done little more than lie in bed all day and watch YouTube videos on my phone (via WiFi, of course—I don't squander data). My brain is mushy, and now that it's evening, I've suddenly got a wild hair to go out to the local No Brand store* ("No Brand" is eMart's house brand, you'll recall) and buy those fantastic hot dogs (pic in this post), which are no longer being sold in my building's downstairs grocery.
If the hunt is good, I'll show off some pics.
*It was a coworker who tipped me off to the existence of the store.
If the hunt is good, I'll show off some pics.
*It was a coworker who tipped me off to the existence of the store.
Friday, October 06, 2017
why "The Hobbit Sucks," parts 1-5
I found an interesting video series narrated by a Canuck who has many a bone to pick with Peter Jackson's The Hobbit trilogy. The first video, Part One, goes over problems of characterization and always returns to the basic premise that expanding the story into a nine-hour trilogy was a fundamental mistake, an opinion with which I heartily agree, even if I did end up liking parts of that trilogy. I've watched Part 1 of the series and will soon delve into Parts 2, 3, 4, and 5. For your edification and delectation, I've embedded all five videos here.
Annoyingly, the title of the video series seems to depend on which label you're reading. The videos themselves seem to be titled "The Hobbit Sucks," if the thumbnail images are to be believed. Meanwhile, the titles below the videos and superimposed on their frames say "Why The Hobbit Sucks," so you're on your own when it comes to nomenclature.
Annoyingly, the title of the video series seems to depend on which label you're reading. The videos themselves seem to be titled "The Hobbit Sucks," if the thumbnail images are to be believed. Meanwhile, the titles below the videos and superimposed on their frames say "Why The Hobbit Sucks," so you're on your own when it comes to nomenclature.
stewing in the office
A coworker documented the putting-together of today's budae-jjigae lunch, which almost everyone seemed to love:
One employee described it as "the best budae-jjigae I've ever eaten," which was high praise. The coworker who took the photos (she sent me nine; I'm displaying only one) went back for seconds and thirds. Another coworker said he normally avoided budae-jjigae, but that he'd have some "because you made it." A few people had only a single bowl; one coworker, recently back from Japan, where he had eaten a ton of salty food, said he wouldn't be able to take the Korean stew without suffering heart palpitations. A shame, that.
A single bokkeum pan of budae was enough to serve the entire office; I had prepped twice as much in case people got super-hungry, but I think that, however much people liked today's stew, this was probably not their favorite Kevin-crafted dish. I'll be taking home the raw ingredients and making another batch of the stew for myself, and I'll consume it over the course of next week. We have a short week thanks to the national holiday of Hangeul Day, which is Monday: it's the day on which South Korea celebrates the invention of hangeul, or the Korean alphabet. The writing system was developed and promulgated by King Sejong and his council in the mid to late 1440s; originally called Hunmin Jeongeum, or roughly, "correct sounds to edify the people," the alphabet helped, at least somewhat, to democratize knowledge: before the invention of hangeul, the written language on the peninsula was Chinese, which was much harder to learn, thus making it the sole province of the rich, the educated, and the privileged. Koreans call hangeul a "scientific" alphabet, which it sort of is. It has flaws and limitations, to be sure, but it perfectly captures Korean phonemes, even if it's a disaster for rendering the sounds of other languages like English and French (strangely, hangeul is great for rendering Spanish).
One employee described it as "the best budae-jjigae I've ever eaten," which was high praise. The coworker who took the photos (she sent me nine; I'm displaying only one) went back for seconds and thirds. Another coworker said he normally avoided budae-jjigae, but that he'd have some "because you made it." A few people had only a single bowl; one coworker, recently back from Japan, where he had eaten a ton of salty food, said he wouldn't be able to take the Korean stew without suffering heart palpitations. A shame, that.
A single bokkeum pan of budae was enough to serve the entire office; I had prepped twice as much in case people got super-hungry, but I think that, however much people liked today's stew, this was probably not their favorite Kevin-crafted dish. I'll be taking home the raw ingredients and making another batch of the stew for myself, and I'll consume it over the course of next week. We have a short week thanks to the national holiday of Hangeul Day, which is Monday: it's the day on which South Korea celebrates the invention of hangeul, or the Korean alphabet. The writing system was developed and promulgated by King Sejong and his council in the mid to late 1440s; originally called Hunmin Jeongeum, or roughly, "correct sounds to edify the people," the alphabet helped, at least somewhat, to democratize knowledge: before the invention of hangeul, the written language on the peninsula was Chinese, which was much harder to learn, thus making it the sole province of the rich, the educated, and the privileged. Koreans call hangeul a "scientific" alphabet, which it sort of is. It has flaws and limitations, to be sure, but it perfectly captures Korean phonemes, even if it's a disaster for rendering the sounds of other languages like English and French (strangely, hangeul is great for rendering Spanish).
...and all I got was this damn blister
The blister isn't nearly as bad as the one that haunted me from April to May this year, but it still hurts like a bitch.
2 pics from the walk home
First is the enormous 63 Building on the island of Yeouido. Next is a daytime shot that contrasts with the early-morning shot that I took on Day 1 of the walk. The flags are out, I imagine, to celebrate Chuseok.
Thursday, October 05, 2017
Pepple on Catalonia
Philosopher John Pepple, who self-identifies as a leftist but is critical of the left's inconsistencies (hence the title of his blog), offers some good thoughts about Catalonian independence, including the idea that we shouldn't be cheering too quickly because the history behind Catalonia's current drive has its own particular traits.
I, for one, can see why Spain is desperate to keep Catalonia within the fold: it's one of the richest and most economically vital regions of the country, as well as the seat of politically and culturally significant Barcelona. Aside from that, I know little to nothing about the situation and its history, so I guess it's time to get reading.
I, for one, can see why Spain is desperate to keep Catalonia within the fold: it's one of the richest and most economically vital regions of the country, as well as the seat of politically and culturally significant Barcelona. Aside from that, I know little to nothing about the situation and its history, so I guess it's time to get reading.
Incheon Walk, Day 4 assessment
I'm back at my place. This felt like a long day.
Pedometer stats:
446 min of walking time
45,940 steps (103 steps/min—brisk!)
22.71 miles walked (dubious)
3570 calories burned (gross)
Weight: 116.0 kg (where I was on May 17 this year)
If I'm not mistaken, today's walk was just under 30 km by a hair. I didn't get turned around in Yeouido, so I don't think I added any distance to what Naver had calculated. As you see above, I didn't really lose any weight during the trip: I was 116.5 kg for my cousin's wedding on the Saturday before the walk (9/30), and after four days' walking, I appear to have lost only a half kilo. That's largely thanks to eating and drinking a lot of junk—sodas and candy bars and whatnot. As I mentioned earlier, I was wrong to think I could "eat with impunity" this time around: I wasn't wearing a huge backpack, and there were no challenging hills to complicate my day, so my daily calorie burn was much lower than it had been during the spring.
Lots of rude assholes along the Han today. The bike path normally has three lanes: two lanes for bike traffic and one lane for pedestrians. Many Korean bikers, however, bike the way they drive: they seem unable to hold their lane, and they constantly swerve into the pedestrian lane.* As if that weren't enough, several ajummas walking toward me insisted on walking on their left side of the path, i.e., my right side of the path. There are signs spray-painted on the ground every few hundred yards saying "Walk on the right." I think I'm going to design a tee shirt that says "WALK ON THE RIGHT" and start carrying one of those startlingly loud spray-can horns that you hear at ball games as a way to get people walking on the proper side of the fucking path. Much of the rudeness, as is true in other countries and cultures, seems to be an urban-versus-rural thing. Once you're out of Seoul, people are generally more polite, although there are still some lingering dickheads even out in the middle of nowhere.
Overall, though, despite the occasional rudeness along the way, this was a good walk, and I'd like to do it again. A half-scale version of the walk is doable on any given weekend: I can start on any Saturday, finish on Sunday afternoon, take a cab to a nearby subway station, and train back into Seoul by evening. While the walk's endpoint is fairly anticlimactic, that final 20-kilometer stretch along the Ara Canal is quite beautiful, and definitely worth the hike.
The weather turned out better than I had thought it would: before the trip, my phone's weather app had been forecasting "partly cloudy" for all four days of the walk, and while there were indeed clouds, most of those days were fairly sunny, too. Temperature-wise, I couldn't have asked for better conditions. This was a far cry from the beginning of August, when my original attempt at walking to Incheon ended in disaster. Today, an easterly** breeze blew in my face nearly the entire way along the Han; at times, the pleasant air currents distracted me from the pain radiating out of my poor, abused feet.
I suppose the lesson, here, is that long-distance walks need to be coupled with fairly strict diets if the goal is to lose weight. Along with that, there needs to be some way to make such walks more energy-consumptive: add some hills and/or wear a heavier backpack.
Thus endeth another walk, and I can now say that I've trekked along the entire Gukto Jongju, from sea to shining sea. Alas, back to reality: we proles have to be in the office tomorrow. Joy. I'm planning to make massive amounts of budae-jjigae for my coworkers, but I'm going to rest first before I get up again and go shopping.
*For what it's worth, I kind of understand the rationale behind swerve-happy Korean driving: it's a function of opportunism. If you settle into any given lane, you're more likely to get blocked in by traffic and to lose the opportunity to break out of a slow lane and slip into a faster one. You see this same sort of "maximizing of probability" in many flying insects like gnats and mosquitoes, which buzz erratically in an effort to maximize the chance of landing on warm, mammalian flesh. It's a shame, though—not to mention damn annoying—that Koreans take this zigzaggy behavior onto the bike path. But that's Korea: nothing is linear here.
**Confusingly, this word can mean "coming from the east" or "facing or moving toward the east," so it's an auto-antonym. In the above post, I'm using it to mean "coming from the east," as a weatherman would.
Pedometer stats:
446 min of walking time
45,940 steps (103 steps/min—brisk!)
22.71 miles walked (dubious)
3570 calories burned (gross)
Weight: 116.0 kg (where I was on May 17 this year)
If I'm not mistaken, today's walk was just under 30 km by a hair. I didn't get turned around in Yeouido, so I don't think I added any distance to what Naver had calculated. As you see above, I didn't really lose any weight during the trip: I was 116.5 kg for my cousin's wedding on the Saturday before the walk (9/30), and after four days' walking, I appear to have lost only a half kilo. That's largely thanks to eating and drinking a lot of junk—sodas and candy bars and whatnot. As I mentioned earlier, I was wrong to think I could "eat with impunity" this time around: I wasn't wearing a huge backpack, and there were no challenging hills to complicate my day, so my daily calorie burn was much lower than it had been during the spring.
Lots of rude assholes along the Han today. The bike path normally has three lanes: two lanes for bike traffic and one lane for pedestrians. Many Korean bikers, however, bike the way they drive: they seem unable to hold their lane, and they constantly swerve into the pedestrian lane.* As if that weren't enough, several ajummas walking toward me insisted on walking on their left side of the path, i.e., my right side of the path. There are signs spray-painted on the ground every few hundred yards saying "Walk on the right." I think I'm going to design a tee shirt that says "WALK ON THE RIGHT" and start carrying one of those startlingly loud spray-can horns that you hear at ball games as a way to get people walking on the proper side of the fucking path. Much of the rudeness, as is true in other countries and cultures, seems to be an urban-versus-rural thing. Once you're out of Seoul, people are generally more polite, although there are still some lingering dickheads even out in the middle of nowhere.
Overall, though, despite the occasional rudeness along the way, this was a good walk, and I'd like to do it again. A half-scale version of the walk is doable on any given weekend: I can start on any Saturday, finish on Sunday afternoon, take a cab to a nearby subway station, and train back into Seoul by evening. While the walk's endpoint is fairly anticlimactic, that final 20-kilometer stretch along the Ara Canal is quite beautiful, and definitely worth the hike.
The weather turned out better than I had thought it would: before the trip, my phone's weather app had been forecasting "partly cloudy" for all four days of the walk, and while there were indeed clouds, most of those days were fairly sunny, too. Temperature-wise, I couldn't have asked for better conditions. This was a far cry from the beginning of August, when my original attempt at walking to Incheon ended in disaster. Today, an easterly** breeze blew in my face nearly the entire way along the Han; at times, the pleasant air currents distracted me from the pain radiating out of my poor, abused feet.
I suppose the lesson, here, is that long-distance walks need to be coupled with fairly strict diets if the goal is to lose weight. Along with that, there needs to be some way to make such walks more energy-consumptive: add some hills and/or wear a heavier backpack.
Thus endeth another walk, and I can now say that I've trekked along the entire Gukto Jongju, from sea to shining sea. Alas, back to reality: we proles have to be in the office tomorrow. Joy. I'm planning to make massive amounts of budae-jjigae for my coworkers, but I'm going to rest first before I get up again and go shopping.
*For what it's worth, I kind of understand the rationale behind swerve-happy Korean driving: it's a function of opportunism. If you settle into any given lane, you're more likely to get blocked in by traffic and to lose the opportunity to break out of a slow lane and slip into a faster one. You see this same sort of "maximizing of probability" in many flying insects like gnats and mosquitoes, which buzz erratically in an effort to maximize the chance of landing on warm, mammalian flesh. It's a shame, though—not to mention damn annoying—that Koreans take this zigzaggy behavior onto the bike path. But that's Korea: nothing is linear here.
**Confusingly, this word can mean "coming from the east" or "facing or moving toward the east," so it's an auto-antonym. In the above post, I'm using it to mean "coming from the east," as a weatherman would.
Wednesday, October 04, 2017
Incheon Walk, Day 3 assessment
Pedometer stats:
380 min of walking time
37,167 steps (97.8 steps/min)
17.42 miles walked (dubious, but felt like it today)
2711 calories burned (gross)
I'm chilling in the EG Hotel, in a much more expensive room for the night. Everything is perfect except for the computer's keyboard, which has a wonky space bar that is currently making typing a chore. Today's walk was short but somewhat painful, which made it feel longer than it actually was. My right foot's blister continues to grow and ache and throb, but visually, it's still little more than a tender spot on my sole.
Early in the walk, I met up with my friend Brian, who lives in the Incheon-ish area, east of Incheon proper. As chronicled in earlier posts, we walked and talked and partook of Bundaberg ginger beer, that heavenly ambrosia. The spiders weren't out on their webs in the early morning, prompting me to wonder where they had gone, but as the air warmed up, they began appearing at their posts, and that's how we managed, at long last, to get that magnificent shot of one of the largest such spiders I had ever seen.
Brian and I parted ways after a while, and I finished my walk solo. It was, according to Naver, about a 28-kilometer trek back into town. Technically, I'm in western Seoul; the city is wider than you might think. Tomorrow's final leg will thus be from Seoul to Seoul, about 32 or 33 km (or longer, if I get confused in Yeouido again). My feet will be a blubbering mess by the end, if today was any indication, but it will have been worth it, even if it means foot pain for the next week or so.
This is my first time actually retracing a large part of the Gukto Jongju; it feels strange to pass by landmarks that I had passed only just the other day. With a lighter backpack on my back, and with the overall flatter route, I don't feel I'm losing much weight this time around, despite the caloric expenditure. I said earlier that, like during my big walk, I could eat with impunity, but I think, this time, that my bad dietary habits are merely nullifying the effects of all the walking. We'll know more when I step on the scales Friday morning. I do know, though, that my resting heart rate is once again dropping significantly, which is always a good thing.
I'm dead tired, so I think I'll end here for tonight. Up at 5:15AM for the final leg.
380 min of walking time
37,167 steps (97.8 steps/min)
17.42 miles walked (dubious, but felt like it today)
2711 calories burned (gross)
I'm chilling in the EG Hotel, in a much more expensive room for the night. Everything is perfect except for the computer's keyboard, which has a wonky space bar that is currently making typing a chore. Today's walk was short but somewhat painful, which made it feel longer than it actually was. My right foot's blister continues to grow and ache and throb, but visually, it's still little more than a tender spot on my sole.
Early in the walk, I met up with my friend Brian, who lives in the Incheon-ish area, east of Incheon proper. As chronicled in earlier posts, we walked and talked and partook of Bundaberg ginger beer, that heavenly ambrosia. The spiders weren't out on their webs in the early morning, prompting me to wonder where they had gone, but as the air warmed up, they began appearing at their posts, and that's how we managed, at long last, to get that magnificent shot of one of the largest such spiders I had ever seen.
Brian and I parted ways after a while, and I finished my walk solo. It was, according to Naver, about a 28-kilometer trek back into town. Technically, I'm in western Seoul; the city is wider than you might think. Tomorrow's final leg will thus be from Seoul to Seoul, about 32 or 33 km (or longer, if I get confused in Yeouido again). My feet will be a blubbering mess by the end, if today was any indication, but it will have been worth it, even if it means foot pain for the next week or so.
This is my first time actually retracing a large part of the Gukto Jongju; it feels strange to pass by landmarks that I had passed only just the other day. With a lighter backpack on my back, and with the overall flatter route, I don't feel I'm losing much weight this time around, despite the caloric expenditure. I said earlier that, like during my big walk, I could eat with impunity, but I think, this time, that my bad dietary habits are merely nullifying the effects of all the walking. We'll know more when I step on the scales Friday morning. I do know, though, that my resting heart rate is once again dropping significantly, which is always a good thing.
I'm dead tired, so I think I'll end here for tonight. Up at 5:15AM for the final leg.
fud
I ended up checking into the expensive-but-nice EG Hotel. The place is great for W90,000 (it had better be); no problems to report. The helpful ladies at the front desk pointed me across the street to where all the restaurants are; I chose a Chinese place (with actual Chinese staffers barking nasally at each other in Chinese) and ordered the gganpunggi plus gun-mandu. The chicken wasn't very crunchy, but I enjoyed the small, flavorful dumplings. The service was frazzled and confused; it took a while to get napkins and chopsticks, both of which ought to have been on the table from the get-go.
The final photo below shows something I haven't seen in years: Shasta brand black-cherry soda! This was truly a holy-shit moment for me; Shasta, like RC Cola, takes me way back to my childhood. The can's design looks different, more tricked-up and modern, but the soda's taste matches what's in my memory.
The final photo below shows something I haven't seen in years: Shasta brand black-cherry soda! This was truly a holy-shit moment for me; Shasta, like RC Cola, takes me way back to my childhood. The can's design looks different, more tricked-up and modern, but the soda's taste matches what's in my memory.