tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541500.post3463055864594450036..comments2024-03-19T06:49:20.449+09:00Comments on BigHominid's Hairy Chasms: solemnityKevin Kimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01328790917314282058noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541500.post-225600628942228352010-09-24T03:32:38.800+09:002010-09-24T03:32:38.800+09:00Here's why you're getting those bogus malw...Here's why you're getting those bogus malware warnings, and what to do about it:<br /><br /><strong><a href="http://1389blog.com/2010/09/23/what-happened-to-blogrolling/" rel="nofollow">What Happened to BlogRolling?</a></strong>1389https://www.blogger.com/profile/04335705483244616965noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541500.post-67920841968480008902010-09-20T09:56:45.578+09:002010-09-20T09:56:45.578+09:00More on Chrome's overeagerness: now I can'...More on Chrome's overeagerness: now I can't even access my Korean email without clicking past one of those warnings because the domain contains content from another domain whose owner lives on the same street as the grandmother of some guy who buys his lunch from another guy who might have hosted malware once during a bad acid trip.<br /><br />OK, so I elaborated a bit there for comic effect, but this is kind of starting to piss me off.<br /><br />(The word verification for this post is "psyche." Is the universe trying to tell me something?)Charleshttp://www.liminality.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541500.post-16139235465705455892010-09-19T12:29:32.665+09:002010-09-19T12:29:32.665+09:00I don't get the same warning when I use Google...I don't get the same warning when I use Google Chrome... but just to be on the safe side, I've pulled any sidebar scripts that use rpc.blogrolling.com. It used to be a good site, but things do change... and besides, I now manage all my blogrolls with Bloglines, which is way easier. <br /><br />Thanks for the Yom Kippur wishes, BTW. It was an especially inspiring day... and now that I can eat and drink again, I'm a happy camper.Elissonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06299361897381169534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541500.post-59571583908884606872010-09-18T13:55:33.374+09:002010-09-18T13:55:33.374+09:00I agree. The first site for which I received a wa...I agree. The first site for which I received a warning really had nothing wrong with it, which makes the warning something of a pain in the ass. There's a great temptation to switch back to Firefox just to avoid encountering those warnings... but there's always that "better safe than sorry" to consider.<br /><br /><br />KevinKevin Kimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01328790917314282058noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541500.post-78447645902909568302010-09-18T13:13:51.633+09:002010-09-18T13:13:51.633+09:00The thing about those warnings is they could easil...The thing about those warnings is they could easily be false positives. They follow the "better safe than sorry" policy, which is good, but it also means they follow the "guilt by association" policy, which is not necessarily good.Charleshttp://www.liminality.orgnoreply@blogger.com