I once joked in a comment over at Lost Nomad that North Korea's real nuke strategy would be: do nothing and then declare the "nuke test" a success. I wonder if that's exactly what has happened.
Some people are saying that a nuke test may have occurred in North Korea. I'll believe it when seismic readings taken by disinterested parties (i.e., someone not on the peninsula, but with the ability to record peninsular seismic activity) confirm this. Until then, I think it's bullshit. The burden of proof is on NK here; it's quite convenient for them to say that no radiation has made it to the surface. One way to make sure there's no radiation is to fake a nuke test.
I'll await more news, as everyone else will, but for the moment you can color me skeptical. If NK has indeed gone through with a nuke test, then as I said before, expect Japan to fast-track its remilitarization. And I doubt a successful nuke test will make much difference to US plans eventually to pull out of Korea.
What makes me curious is how nuke diplomacy is going to go, what with a Korean soon to be heading up the UN and therefore in control of the IAEA. Perhaps more interesting than that question is how Korean citizens will react to Ban Ki-moon's decisions, especially as they pertain to North Korea: proudly? angrily? I can imagine a whole Shakespearean gamut of emotions.
As my anus likes to say: "More later."
_
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.