Friday, February 09, 2007

who's the better fighter?

I've now shown parts of the movie "Troy" to my students on two occasions. We are winding down with the eight-week term, which means I am once again in the middle of teaching my four-week Greco-Roman mythology course. I decided to look up some trivia on "Troy," and the following tidbit (from IMdB) caught my eye. The mark of a good movie fighter is his or her ability to exercise control during a choreographed fight (something the great Samo Hung is known for):

Brad Pitt and Eric Bana both did their own fighting scenes. They also made an agreement that they would pay for every hit they accidentally made. The costs were $50 for a lighter blow and $100 for a hard blow. Pitt ended up paying $750 to Bana, who didn't have to pay Pitt anything.

If you watch the Achilles/Hector fight in "Troy," you could argue on Pitt's behalf that his character, Achilles, was on the attack during that entire scene, which meant that Pitt had a greater chance of accidentally striking Bana. But two counterarguments immediately present themselves: (1) no self-respecting martial artist involved in movie fighting would hide behind such a defense, and Pitt, while not a martial artist, would be aware of this; and (2) it's just as easy to clout people while blocking as it is to hit them while on the attack.


_

1 comment:

  1. No surprise there. Pitt is nothing more than a vogue poseur puppet. His acting is atrocious. Eric ( Hoot - "It don't matter what I think") Bana convincingly played a SpecOps nco in Blackhawk Down, Mossad team leader Avner in Munich and, of course, The Hulk.

    ReplyDelete

READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!

All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.