Tuesday, November 20, 2007

clever little creatures

The office normally waits until the final week of term to give out teacher evaluation forms to the students, but I saw that they had given those forms out today. Sneaky, sneaky. I saw, too, that the eval form had been changed ever so slightly; this may have been partly at my behest because I had complained about one point in particular: the final criterion on the eval form, #5, has traditionally said, "Overall, the course was satisfactory." This criterion has been replaced by another; I never liked the original #5, and I'm glad it's gone.

As I've noted before, my ratings have consistently been over 90% by a substantial margin, so I'm not motivated by resentment or petty spite when I complain about the eval form. But it always bugged me, in previous semesters, when I saw that a student had given me the maximum points for Criteria #1-4, then dropped me down a point for Criterion #5 (as happened on a few occasions). I told the office that, for all intents and purposes, the students' overall feelings about the course should really be the average of the scores they give me for specific points about my teaching. It seems odd for a student to drop me down a point in the "overall" category after giving me full marks in all the specific categories.

This indicates that, in the context of the eval form, Question #5 is a bad question because it can be interpreted in too many different ways. "Overall" is a fuzzy enough general concept; when juxtaposed with slightly more specific concepts (such as teacher punctuality, thoroughness in preparation, etc.), the fuzziness only increases. If "overall" doesn't mean "the point average of all the previous specific criteria," then what exactly does it mean?

I hadn't expected the eval form revisions to appear this semester, to be honest; I had told my immediate supervisor that I wanted to discuss major changes to the eval form with her. Apparently, she went ahead and made some changes, anyway, and then decided to distribute the forms a week earlier than normal. Ah, well.


_

1 comment:

READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!

All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.

AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.