Despite these problems, I enjoyed the gritty feel of the plot, and the 80s-throwback tone. It was interesting to see that two of the cast members were faces I knew from watching "24." I also savored the movie's treatment of Big Issues: whether the world is constantly changing or the same, whether human nature can rise above the merely animal, and whether killing is ever justified. In all, not a bad flick, though it's definitely not for the ladies. (In fact, the movie might best function as a tonic for guys who have just had to sit through a treacly romantic comedy with their Significant Other.)
In watching the movie, I was amazed to discover how right my parody of the "Rambo" preview trailer was. The trailer pretty much gave away the plot of the whole movie.
*From the online CIA World Factbook:
Since 1989 the military authorities in Burma have promoted the name Myanmar as a conventional name for their state; the US Government did not adopt the name, which is a derivative of the Burmese short-form name Myanma Naingngandaw. (entry last updated June 24, 2010)
**Then again, the image of a hulking white guy slashing his way through hordes of little brown people calls to mind George Carlin's old rant about American military policy: if they're brown, we bomb them. I'm not saying I agree with Carlin's caricature, but it has to be admitted that the movie doesn't exactly refute Carlin's satirical imagery. Then again, the Karen rebels themselves felt energized by Stallone's film, which was an underground success in Burma.
_
Never mind Rambo. What about "The Next Food Network Star"?
ReplyDeleteYeah, I'm behind in my commentary, but I'm dealing with some major family issues right now, so I'll have to post later.
ReplyDeleteKevin
And I finally read Rimbaud!
ReplyDeleteJeffery Hodges
* * *