Yes, indeed! I boiled my experiences, allowing the essence to rise up, condense against the copper top of the still, and then run down the lyne arm into a worm tub, producing the new make spirit currently on the front page.
Give it ten years or so and it should be much better.
And why only 60? Aim high, man! I'm shooting for a hundred myself. I figure even if I fall short (which I no doubt will), I'll get a good run out of it.
But if you're interested in trying some really good whisky, as opposed to prose, before you die, let me know.
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
Yes, indeed! I boiled my experiences, allowing the essence to rise up, condense against the copper top of the still, and then run down the lyne arm into a worm tub, producing the new make spirit currently on the front page.
ReplyDeleteGive it ten years or so and it should be much better.
Ten years, eh? I'll be 57. Since I'm not planning on living beyond 60, I'll have to be quick about sampling your aged prose. Can't wait.
ReplyDeleteIt'll be worth the wait.
ReplyDeleteAnd why only 60? Aim high, man! I'm shooting for a hundred myself. I figure even if I fall short (which I no doubt will), I'll get a good run out of it.
But if you're interested in trying some really good whisky, as opposed to prose, before you die, let me know.