Let's see here: Trump is cozying up to Abe of Japan (the DPRK's hated enemy), and seems inclined to adopt a more aggressive stance towards China not only economically but also geopolitically (for example, granting greater legitimacy to Taiwan). A period of instability seems likely for China, and since the PRC is North Korea's main protector and benefactor, Kim Jong-un must be feeling rather vulnerable at the moment as well. Whenever a regime is feeling insecure and threatened by external forces, pretenders to the throne are generally more emboldened. Kim Jong-nam was actually Kim Jong-il's preferred successor. Did Kim Jong-un decide to tie up that loose end for good?
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.
Let's see here: Trump is cozying up to Abe of Japan (the DPRK's hated enemy), and seems inclined to adopt a more aggressive stance towards China not only economically but also geopolitically (for example, granting greater legitimacy to Taiwan). A period of instability seems likely for China, and since the PRC is North Korea's main protector and benefactor, Kim Jong-un must be feeling rather vulnerable at the moment as well. Whenever a regime is feeling insecure and threatened by external forces, pretenders to the throne are generally more emboldened. Kim Jong-nam was actually Kim Jong-il's preferred successor. Did Kim Jong-un decide to tie up that loose end for good?
ReplyDelete