It's been noted in several articles that the president, not the Senate, is the one who must ultimately order an FBI investigation, so the buck stops at President Trump. But Jeff Flake has been wishy-washy about the Kavanaugh nomination from the start; he's considered a "moderate" Republican (although his voting record apparently shows little bipartisanship) who is also a never-Trumper. Again with the psychologizing: there's some speculation that Flake's actions are motivated by a dislike for Trump, which is why he has acquiesced to demands for an investigation. The problem, of course, is how this plays right into Democrat hands: let them get their fingertips around the edge of the door, and they rip the door right off its hinges. There are already howls that one week is not enough time for the FBI to do a thorough investigation, so there's every likelihood that the foot-dragging will continue through a good part of October.
Blowback will be a bitch, though: if Kavanaugh is confirmed, he's going to have a long, long memory of what he went through, and this will likely affect how he decides court cases as a Supreme Court justice. Also, if the Democrats succeed in toppling Kavanaugh, this will motivate Republicans to come out in droves to the voting booth come November, and the already-tenuous notion of a "blue wave" will be swamped by an even bigger red wave. Even if the Dems fail, their extravagant efforts at obstruction will be remembered. Either way, there are reasons for the GOP voter base to be fired up, and Senator Lindsey Graham's angry speech is one instantiation of that anger. This has been a dirty process; Graham was right to point that out. It's been made dirtier by the news that someone in Maxine Water's office is probably the culprit behind the doxxing of GOP senators. Maxine Waters is an idiot, but it would be wrong to underestimate her low cunning.
None of this improves my trust in government as a whole, and that's one way in which I swing right: I think government sucks. Its venality is currently on display (well, it's always on display) for all to see. Republicans still haven't learned the lesson that the Democrats are fighting for all the marbles; fools like Jeff Flake play right into this dynamic by allowing the Democrats yet another foothold. Until the GOP learns to fight as if its very existence were at stake, we can expect more fiascos like the one we're watching now.
Seen on Gab:
I'd like to give Ford the benefit of the doubt, but her inconsistencies make this hard.
Seen at John Mac's blog:
Someone had to go there.
ADDENDUM: we should note that Kavanaugh has already undergone checks from the FBI and other parties. From the above-linked article:
"Throughout this process, I've been interviewed by the FBI, I've done a number of 'background' calls directly with the Senate, and yesterday, I answered questions under oath about every topic the senators and their counsel asked me," Kavanaugh said in a statement. "I've done everything they have requested and will continue to cooperate."
Then, of course, there's Joe Biden's rather unwise comment from 1991 undermining the value of FBI investigations:
"The next person that refers to an FBI report as being worth anything obviously doesn’t understand anything," Biden said. "FBI explicitly does not, in this or any other case, reach a conclusion. Period. “The reason why we cannot rely on the FBI report — you wouldn’t like it if we did, is because it is inconclusive,” he continued. “They say ‘He said, she said, and they said.’ Period. So when people are waving FBI report[s] before you, understand they do not, they do not, they do not reach conclusions. They do not make, as my friend points out, they do not make recommendations."
Significantly, this was said during the Clarence Thomas hearings. I guess all those Democrats clamoring for the FBI to do something don't understand anything, right, Joe?
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.