Monday, June 24, 2019

quick-and-dirty note to self

I thought I had slapped up a link to my friend Steve's "quick and dirty" notes on PoMo, a.k.a. postmodernism, but I guess I hadn't after all these years. I've found Steve's writeup to be the clearest and most useful summary of PoMo I've ever read. Agree with PoMo or not (longtime readers know I don't, although I think PoMo has its place—as one perspective among many—within the narrow confines of art and literary criticism), but it helps to have a simple breakdown of PoMo as a philosophy, an artistic style, and a historical period.

Here's that Google Docs link.

And here are some keywords:
Stephen doCarmo, Dr. d, Dr. doCarmo, quick and dirty, notes, PoMo, postmodernism



2 comments:

  1. Good stuff!

    There are honestly elements of PoMo that I agree with, to a certain extent--I am also wary of essentializing (or totalizing) arguments, for example. At the same time, I also recognize the utility of categories in research, as long as we see them for what they are. I find PoMo taken to extremes tiring, and I absolutely despise the way most PoMo thinkers write--it seems deliberately obfuscatory.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're a nicer man than I am; I have a much less charitable view of PoMo, but I won't rehash my perspective in any detail here since I've already written quite a bit about where I think PoMo goes wrong. In brief, it mainly boils down to the self-undermining nature of its grander claims that, when gathered together, make PoMo hard for me to take seriously.

    ReplyDelete

READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!

All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.