images

This man is not a leader.

Morally conservative commentary on the dangers of sex (gay sex?).

The above animated GIF gets more confusing the more I look at it. At first, I thought it was simply a humorous warning, from a moral prude's perspective, about the perils of sex. Then, I started pondering whether both stick figures were male since the stick figure on the bottom looks no different from the one on top—no extra boobs or other sex-linked traits. If the message is a warning about gay sex (biblically referred to as sodomy, i.e., anal sex), then I'm here to say that I don't give a shit what two responsible adults of any sex might do behind closed doors. It's pretty antiquated to think that God actually cares about the male or female nature of Tab A and Slot B. Reminds me of all the foreskin jokes out there: God actually cares about that kind of thing? What sort of petty God is this?

To be clear, as a hetero male myself, I don't swing "that way," so I do find the notion of butt stuff rather off-putting. But as I've argued before, this is at the level of mere preference, not a moral judgment about whether sodomy sends you straight to hell. This question of preference is on the level of whether you want onions on your pizza. I don't. I think putting onions on your pizza is disgusting, and I reserve the right to have that opinion, but at the same time, I won't judge you if you like onions on your pizza. See where I'm coming from? You do you as long as you're not hurting anyone.

I wonder how true this is.

I'd have said "leftists."

I heard she reconciled and has been shilling for Old Joe.

I think I finally understand. It's all worse in Korean.

I hope that's not really a pic of a dog with its next meal, but I don't see a fire anywhere.

ouch