At first, I thought this piece by Charles was going to be a rant about the gambler's fallacy (or, really, its opposite, the hot-hand fallacy), but it goes in a somewhat different direction.
Yep, that was just me being a little ranty. I could have taken it in a number of directions, and almost did, but I deliberately cut some stuff out to keep it short so I could actually post it. Been spending too much of my time in the evenings watching the Olympics.
Also been MIA from here for a while. Trying to catch up on the latest now.
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.
Yep, that was just me being a little ranty. I could have taken it in a number of directions, and almost did, but I deliberately cut some stuff out to keep it short so I could actually post it. Been spending too much of my time in the evenings watching the Olympics.
ReplyDeleteAlso been MIA from here for a while. Trying to catch up on the latest now.