Little did I know that Jeff has been thinking along almost exactly the same lines I have: see here. Jeff goes a bit further than I do, as he doubts whether NK has any nukes at all. But he and I are on the same page regarding this "test," to wit: until we see hard evidence, there's little reason to believe the explosion was nuclear.
So it's time to form a "nuke skeptics" club. Membership simply requires enough skepticism to maintain that we still don't know whether NK actually detonated a nuke. No fees, no displays of party affiliation, nothing but NK-related skepticism to join this club.
We need a good acronym. How about--
PENIS = Pyongyang Emits Nasty, Inferior Semen
SANDWICH = Skeptics About Nukes Don't Wallow In Credulous Haze
EATDOG = Eloquent Argument That Dickless Ogres Grandstand
SCROTE = See Clearly, Reflect Often, Think Empirically
ANUS = Alliance of Notably Unconvinced Skeptics
LABIA = Leader's Asinine Blunder Invites Amusement
CUM = Cynics Undermining Menace
SPERM = Scientific Pondering Eventually Reveals Mundanity
CMEN = Corea Manufactures Effeminate Nuke
CLIT = Chimeras Liven International Talks
CHUNK = Classic Hubris Undoes North Korea
_
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.