Little did I know that Jeff has been thinking along almost exactly the same lines I have: see here. Jeff goes a bit further than I do, as he doubts whether NK has any nukes at all. But he and I are on the same page regarding this "test," to wit: until we see hard evidence, there's little reason to believe the explosion was nuclear.
So it's time to form a "nuke skeptics" club. Membership simply requires enough skepticism to maintain that we still don't know whether NK actually detonated a nuke. No fees, no displays of party affiliation, nothing but NK-related skepticism to join this club.
We need a good acronym. How about--
PENIS = Pyongyang Emits Nasty, Inferior Semen
SANDWICH = Skeptics About Nukes Don't Wallow In Credulous Haze
EATDOG = Eloquent Argument That Dickless Ogres Grandstand
SCROTE = See Clearly, Reflect Often, Think Empirically
ANUS = Alliance of Notably Unconvinced Skeptics
LABIA = Leader's Asinine Blunder Invites Amusement
CUM = Cynics Undermining Menace
SPERM = Scientific Pondering Eventually Reveals Mundanity
CMEN = Corea Manufactures Effeminate Nuke
CLIT = Chimeras Liven International Talks
CHUNK = Classic Hubris Undoes North Korea
_
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
when "Nodong" means "no dong"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment