There's an interesting history behind the scenes of "Star Trek: Picard." It turns out that Patrick Stewart had a lot to say about where he saw his character going, and Seasons 1 and 2 were mainly a reflection of Stewart's own ideas. In his zeal to explore a more tragic side of Captain (now Admiral) Jean-Luc Picard, Stewart inadvertently(?) created a broken man with no agency, and audiences hated the new Picard. He seemed as defanged and impotent as Rian Johnson's Luke Skywalker. A lot of the reason Season 3 ended up being so good was that writer-producer Terry Matalas stepped up and gave us the Picard we'd been wanting to see—the legendary hero of Starfleet, off on a final adventure. While the writing for the season was a team effort, by all accounts, it was Matalas who saved the show and allowed "Star Trek: Picard" to end on a high. Thanks, Terry, for the herculean effort.
Moral: don't let actors hijack your show. Stewart is without a doubt a great actor, but he obviously shouldn't be writing story treatments.
ADDENDUM: some vindication here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.