Paul Joseph Watson on a "demented" discussion between a UK teacher and two students about sex, gender, and mental illness:
My take as always: I'm fine with gender being a social construction existing on a continuum. Just don't touch biological sex. Note that the teacher tries to argue that there are three biological sexes: male, female, and intersex. That's wrong: an intersex person is phenotypically expressing two distinct sexual genotypes: intersex is not a "third sex." A "third sex" would have a distinctly different reproductive function, one never seen before.
And here's PJW on a UK "hotel from hell":
Diversity is our strength, right? We need to define which diversity we're talking about.
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.