Paul Joseph Watson on a "demented" discussion between a UK teacher and two students about sex, gender, and mental illness:
My take as always: I'm fine with gender being a social construction existing on a continuum. Just don't touch biological sex. Note that the teacher tries to argue that there are three biological sexes: male, female, and intersex. That's wrong: an intersex person is phenotypically expressing two distinct sexual genotypes: intersex is not a "third sex." A "third sex" would have a distinctly different reproductive function, one never seen before.
And here's PJW on a UK "hotel from hell":
Diversity is our strength, right? We need to define which diversity we're talking about.
No comments:
Post a Comment