Saw this in a comment over at Instapundit. The commenter wrote: "Nate Silver is sure willing to talk smack about statistics when they show what he wants to believe."
Here's the hilarious graphic the commenter displayed in his comment:
I wrote a comment in that same thread, slightly before this person submitted his comment:
Nate Silver is the stats-guru-turned-drooling-moron whose leftward bias had him cherry-picking poll data for his vaunted "algorithm" in 2016, leading to idiotic predictions—up to the night before the big election—of a large-margin Hillary victory. Ever since that embarrassment, he's been doing what he can to rehabilitate his image as a stats guru. I realize I'm committing the genetic fallacy by automatically dismissing insights just because they come from Nate Silver, but I'm simply not interested enough to do more than toss off a one-paragraph comment when the man opens a major orifice to flatulate a pronouncement. To me, Silver is more a source for comedy than a source for prognostications. His anus richly deserves a stiletto heel rammed inside it. (If a lady might deign to sully some of her footwear.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.