The judges let the import taxes stay in place while allowing the case to be sent back to a lower court.
A U.S. appeals court ruled Aug. 29 that most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs are illegal, saying that he exceeded his authority, but the judges let the import taxes stay in place while allowing the case to be sent back to a lower court.
In a 7-4 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that Trump’s reciprocal tariffs unveiled in April are mostly illegal.
The appeals court upheld a ruling handed down by the Court of International Trade earlier this year, saying that the president incorrectly used his emergency powers to issue the tariffs.
A majority of judges on the federal appeals court found the president overstepped his authority under a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
“The statute bestows significant authority on the President to undertake a number of actions in response to a declared national emergency, but none of these actions explicitly include the power to impose tariffs, duties, or the like, or the power to tax,” the court stated.
The court also said that it appears to be “unlikely that Congress intended, in enacting IEEPA, to depart from its past practice and grant the President unlimited authority to impose tariffs.”
“The statute neither mentions tariffs (or any of its synonyms) nor has procedural safeguards that contain clear limits on the President’s power to impose tariffs,” the judges added Friday.
Friday’s ruling will not take effect until Oct. 14, allowing the Trump administration to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Trump has made tariffs a pillar of U.S. foreign policy in his second term, saying they are a way to correct what he said are unfair trade practices by countries that export goods to the United States and to reshore manufacturing. He also used tariffs to target issues of drug trafficking, border security, and illegal immigration.
The tariffs have given the Trump administration leverage to extract economic concessions from trading partners but have also increased volatility in financial markets.
Yes, let's just impede economic recovery, why don't we? Who's more conservative—the people wanting to go back to the lame, old ways or the people struggling toward relief?
And Trump "exceeded his authority"? Let that sink in for a sec.





No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.