Thursday, April 02, 2026

I wonder, too

 

I asked the AI god where man buns are most likely to be found. It said:

Man buns are most frequently spotted in trend-conscious urban environments, creative workspaces, and places associated with leisure, fitness, and hip counter-culture. Based on typical sightings and styling trends, here are the most likely places to see them:

Urban and Neighborhood Hotspots

Brooklyn (NYC), Shoreditch (London), and Berlin: These areas are considered the "cultural ovens" where the style was popularized.

Artisanal Coffee Shops & Cafes: Casual, hipster-friendly cafes are prime spots.

Speakeasy-style Bars & Pubs: Common among bartenders and patrons in trendy nightlife areas.

Leisure and Retail

Disneyland: The park became famous for "man bun" spotting, with many appearing on Instagram. 

Trendy Shopping Districts: Places like All Saints or artisan markets.

Art-Sociology Buildings/Campuses: College areas often host trends.

Professional and Fitness Settings

Creative Offices & Co-working Spaces: Tech and creative industries often allow for more relaxed grooming.

Gyms & Fitness Centers: Popular among men who work out frequently and need to keep long hair in place.

Barbershops: Specifically those offering "undercut" or "taper fade" services, often paired with a well-groomed beard.

Appearance Variations

The "Top Knot" or High Bun: Often seen on the crown of the head, favored for a "pineapple" or trendy look.

The "Low Bun": Located at the nape of the neck, often worn by men with a "beach bum" or "casual" style.

Undercut/Fade Bun: Shaved or closely clipped sides with a full bun on top.

Best Times/Conditions to See Them

Sunny weather: Often paired with a "disheveled" look.

"After-work" hours: In metropolitan cities, they are sometimes worn as a sophisticated look for the office or a night out.



Wednesday, April 01, 2026

a life of service

Yes, the pressure-washing guy also does mowing. It's a great business model: He does his services for free and makes money from his YouTube videos (578K subscribers so far) and from merchandise sales on his website(s). A life of service. Can't knock that.




60 quizzes????

I need to stop focusing on generating more units in my grammar curriculum so I can concentrate on vibe-coding more quizzes. How many quizzes "behind" am I? It seems the answer is sixty. I've done quizzes for all of my Nouns sections. Here's what's left for the moment (assume one quiz per unit):

Verbs: 9 units
Verb Tenses: 5 units
Grammatical Mood: 6 units
Pronouns: 10 units
Adjectives: 7 units
Adverbs: 6 units
Conjunctions: 3 units
Interjections: 3 units
Prepositions: 11 units

That's a total of 60 units, and with a quiz per unit, that's 60 quizzes(!!) I need to make. So far, I have only quizzes for the Nouns section—six units, so only six quizzes done. That's a real imbalance, one I hadn't been keeping track of.

Of the 60 units mentioned, I have only one more Prepositions unit to write up, so I've already done 59 out of 60 units. That's a book's worth of work in and of itself, with only two paying subscribers to see it (yes—I lost my third paying subscriber, maybe because he got bored, maybe because he didn't want to do the work; there was no explanation given). The curriculum is already big and it's only gonna get bigger: With Prepositions out of the way, I'll eventually be working on Punctuation next. On the original calendar, that would've taken me through July (going by release dates). If I switch to this new routine, though, I'll be pushing Punctuation back by a few months to vibe-code all of these quizzes. 

If I manage two quizzes a day, it'll take thirty days to get through them all, but I've got other projects to work on as well (like the movie-review book, various videos, more images, and other book projects), so I'll need to figure out a way to juggle all of this work. Still working on that. But I confess that the prospect of not working on new grammar units—which take all day to make—is something of a relief. I suspect, though, that making quizzes is going to become a slog as well, especially the way I do it. We'll see. But starting tomorrow, I'll finish Prepositions and be vibe-coding quizzes for the Verbs section. That's all I can say for the moment. When I have a clear schedule worked out, I'll slap it up on the blog.


Adam does ramen/ramyeon

I'm kind of rooting for Adam to get bigger. He's got over 500K subscribers on YouTube. Maybe he can reach a million by the end of this year or sometime next year.




I stand on the sidelines, watching sadly

I'm not a fan of most Korean bread, and a lot of bread that's considered "Korean" is actually ripped off from Japan. Many of the "Korean" breads I like come from elsewhere, like "milk bread," with its almost baguette-like interior, or the bready "cheesecake" that also came to Korea via Japan. Now, you could argue that all bread in Korea has foreign origins, and I don't know enough about the history of bread in Korea to rebut you. Maybe that argument is correct. But calling Korea the "kings of bread" seems a little much and a little premature. Meanwhile, enjoy your carbs and your extra pounds, Korea!

You could also argue that, once the concept of bread came to Korea, the creative possibilities for cultural mingling exploded. Like the Vietnamese with their bánh mì baguettes, Koreans have recipes for bread that also include rice flour; down the street from me, Kim Young-mo Bakery has a weirdly chewy-yet-charming baguette that's partly made with rice flour and covered in black-sesame seeds. Is this baguette in fact Korean, or was it imported from the Japanese? Probably the latter, but when I've bought the baguette, it's always been from Kim Young-mo (Kim, and maybe his sons, too, trained in Paris). Koreans love multi-grain rice, which probably explains why so many Korean sandwich breads are covered in crazy constellations of grain and often shot through with same: The multi-grain concept already existed in some form on the peninsula (think: ogok-bap/오곡밥, or 5-grain rice; there's even ten-grain rice) before multi-grain breads rose into prominence here.

Honestly, I have mixed feelings. All cultures borrow from each other; all cultures appropriate non-native things and make them their own by putting their own local spin on them. This isn't evil: It's only natural and normal, and I wish all of the oversensitive Americans who think cultural appropriation is a sin would just explode into bloody spray and leave the rest of us alone. To that extent, whether Koreans are borrowing and then riffing off bread that has come to Korea via Japan or Europe or the States is irrelevant. But the simplest question for food is: Do you think it tastes good? And sadly, I have to say that, in Korea, bread has been seized upon and, in many cases, buried under the addition of so many local-culture flourishes and curlicues that most of it just doesn't have much appeal to me. Simpler is usually better, which is why I love a good, old-fashioned jambon-beurre or—even better—saucisson-beurre

All of which is to say that I don't mind if Koreans keep trying to find new, breakthrough tastes and shapes and whatnot as long as Koreans don't mind that I think 95% of their efforts in this direction are crap. I'm not saying that to be bitter, haughty, or snobbish: Mother Nature herself works in much the same way, relentlessly producing variations of life, most of which prove to be unviable or just more of the same thing, and only a tiny fraction of which will ever prove superior to what has come before. So I hope Koreans do keep innovating, but I also know I'll have to wade through a lot of shit to find the good stuff.


Sam's "pasta showdown"

Oh, the tempting carbs.




almost didn't go anywhere yesterday

While I wasn't exactly in excruciating agony yesterday, I did strain my back a few hours before I had planned to go across town, and that experience left me walking around gingerly, wincing. The inciting incident happened when I leaned over my bed to pick up the 10-kilo dumbbells I had left there to take a break from my exercise set. When the spasm and the pain hit, my first emotions were annoyance and anger; when I slowly realized how deep the spasm had gone, I began to wonder whether I should cancel dinner with Charles and his wife. I stiffened and braced my core (which is something I must still do consciously because, despite my various exercises, I've got a long way to go to repair my core); this reduced pain, and for the next two to three hours, I did everything gingerly and found my brain stuck in Cancel with Charles or not? mode. By the end of that time, I felt good enough to override the hesitation with a Fuck it, I'll go, and so I went. Dinner went more or less smoothly, as did the taxi ride back to my place. And today, I feel a bit better, though still far from 100%. Today's a fasting day, so I'll just take it easy, sip some liquid, and try to remember to keep my core braced (I have to remind myself every thirty seconds). I ought to be much better in a day or two.

These sorts of back spasms are rare, but when they happen, they can be big. No spasm has ever been debilitatingly, flat-on-your-back bad, but I often wonder when the Big One is going to hit. On that day, I'll undoubtedly have to cancel my plans.


helping out the neighbors




Tuesday afternoon/evening

Spring has sprung. While I waited for a taxi to ferry me over to the Seoul National University neighborhood, I took a few pics of the cherry blossoms on my street:



I met my buddy Charles and his wife for burgers at a place called Daily Fix. My smash-style double burger was good. Charles got some sort of truffle burger with thick-cut steakhouse fries; I got regular fries, and the Missus shared Charles's fries and drink. I had a Coke all to myself. It was a good meal. We talked about Project Hail Mary

burger and fries

burger, side view

fries (which had a little onion dust on them)

Charles's steakhouse fries

The Missus left us to keep working on a bespoke couch the couple had purchased. Charles and I headed elsewhere for dessert. There was a quiet, little place along Shyarosu-gil, a system of back streets lined with shops and eateries not far from SNU campus. We settled in; Charles ordered a minuscule tart and a fruit-themed tea: I got a frothy hot chocolate that was surprisingly excellent and a slice of Basque cheesecake, which was good but which also tasted a wee bit of the refrigerator it had been sitting in—which can be a problem when you sell desserts by the slice (although, frankly, I didn't see how the cheesecake was being stored).

the "ba-chi-ke," Korean abbreviation for Basque cheesecake

Charles is the one who taught me ba-chi-ke.

Along with the East Asian tendency to take Western words and chop off phonemes and syllables to "Koreanize" or "Sinify" or "Japanify" them (e.g., rimokon/리모콘 for "remote control"), Koreans also tend to run words through something like a polysynthesis filter, reducing them to abbreviated forms by retaining only key syllables, thus making the words easier to remember and handle. Think of meokbang, for example, which I think comes from meongneun/먹는 (eating) and bangsong/방송 (broadcast). Take the meok/먹 from meongneun/먹는 and the bang/방 from bangsong/방송, and voilà: meokbang/먹방 (often badly romanized* as mukbang in the West).


I ended up liking the hot chocolate a lot more.

It was good to sit down with Charles, whom I see only a few times per year. All told, today's meet-up went for about two-and-a-half hours. So my "eating day" changed from Wednesday to Tuesday, which means I get to fast for three days until the weekend! Yay!

__________

*"Badly romanized" because of that damn u. Damn you, u! If a girl is named Sunhee, the u is an American short u (i.e., it's an "uh"), rhyming with the English word sun. But in the famous admiral's name Yi Sun-shin, the u is an "ooh" sound, as in food. This inherent vagueness makes it hard for an anglophone Westerner to know how to pronounce mukbang: is it "mawk-bahng"/"muhk-bahng," or is it "moohk-bahng"? The proper romanization for the Korean vowel "ㅓ" is eo, which is something like the eo in George (says my old boss).


the myth and mystique will only grow

 


Tuesday, March 31, 2026

high-rep bodyweight squats




let him have his happy ending




the long, lonely road

To think that, before my health crises, I'd have had the arrogance to consider walking part or all of this route (with proper planning of course). Amazing what a few years—plus a couple of medical disasters—can do to your pride.

I guess my one worry, should I try to walk this desolate route, would be that I might encounter a shiny demon who demands that I play him the best song in the world. Oh, and there's that whole dehydration-starvation-exposure-skin cancer thing. That's worrisome, too.


unclog yourself

As one commenter to this video puts it: 

So eat some sardines with tomatoes on it and a side of dark chocolate, washed down with some green tea containing aged garlic extract while in a sauna.




RIP, Chuck

From a few months before Chuck Norris's death:




he had plenty of time to see...?

While it's tempting to attribute this to idiocy, I don't think it is. If you replay the video a few times, you see that the biker was in an uncomfortable position: he'd been using the shoulder as his bike lane (which, depending on the state, can be legal or not—freeway biking is not encouraged), and the traffic to his left was relentless. I think he was trying to thread the needle between the parked vehicles and the traffic, and he simply miscalculated. The alternative is ridiculous: You have to believe the biker simply wasn't paying attention, but that's all bikers do when they're biking! A biker's attention can't waver for even a fraction of a second because road hazards are everywhere, even when bikers aren't on freeways. And I'm sure the biker was aware of the cameraman's car, which was right on his ass, and which might actually have been the cause of the cyclist's difficulty. So while the scene is admittedly hilarious and feels like revenge for all of the rude bikers who stray into pedestrian lanes, in this one case, my sympathy is entirely with the biker.


Monday, March 30, 2026

le fléau contre la masse




Project Hail Mary: review

Ryland Grace (Ryan Gosling) and friend in front of video images of Earth
[WARNING: spoilers. And see my 2021 review of the novel here.]

2026's Project Hail Mary is a science-fiction movie directed by Phil Lord and Christopher Miller (known in the industry as "Lord and Miller"), the pair who are famous for their comedic and animation-related sensibilities thanks to efforts like Into the Spider-verse, Across the Spider-verse, The Lego Movie, the Jump Street comedies, and Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs. Lord and Miller's newest film is based on the novel Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir. One of the biggest questions for me, going into this movie, was how faithful it would be to the book. The answer is mixed, but the movie is generally faithful to the book's story beats. So the only issue is how much the book-wise viewer can tolerate the many changes to the plot details. The standard defenses for changes from books to movies revolve around the types of media involved and the need to respect a movie's time constraints. I can understand this to some extent, but then how do you justify it when filmmakers add new material to a story after subtracting material from the original story? To this day, people are still arguing about Peter Jackson's excision of Tom Bombadil from his The Lord of the Rings films while including non-canonical events like, among other things, Aragorn's accidental cliff-dive in the movie version of The Two Towers. I'm beginning to think that, if you take material out for time constraints, you shouldn't add new material in. Fortunately or unfortunately, Lord and Miller's Project Hail Mary, like Peter Jackson's 2001-2003 Meisterwerk, does both.

A brief summary of the movie version of Project Hail Mary would be this. Dr. Ryland Grace (Ryan Gosling) is a middle-school science teacher who, years ago, wrote a controversial paper on xenobiology arguing that extraterrestrial life doesn't need to be water-based. He is roped in by the mysterious-but-powerful Eva Stratt (Sandra Hüller) to help solve the problem of the sudden diminution of our sun's luminosity. After the discovery that the cause of the problem is an alien microorganism dubbed astrophage (Gk. "star-eater"), and the further discovery that the sun Tau Ceti has not been affected by astrophage while so many local stars have, Project Hail Mary is commissioned: a one-way trip by three astronauts on an astrophage-fueled vessel, the Hail Mary, to see Tau Ceti up close, learn the secret of the star's immunity, then bring the secret back to Earth to save our solar system. Grace helps to train the mission team, but when the team's scientist is killed in an astrophage explosion, Grace—a coward—becomes an unwilling replacement. He is the only one to survive the four-year journey to Tau Ceti, and once there, he meets an arachnoid, echolocating, boulder-like alien from 40 Eridani whom he calls Rocky; the two learn to communicate with each other, realize they have the same mission, and work together to save their respective worlds.

For people who've never read the novel, the movie is a fine experience, and I can understand the rave reviews it's been getting. The pacing and editing are both kept tight; the visuals (especially of planet Adrian by Tau Ceti) are often stunning; the dialogue is witty and well written. The scene in which Grace has to select the computer voice he uses for Rocky's translated utterances (Rocky communicates in tunes and tones) contains some hilarious alternatives—like the voices of an orgasmic porn star, Meryl Streep (her actual voice), and a Frenchman—that get discarded before Grace finally settles on a more generically masculine voice (James Ortiz). I was a bit worried, based on dialogue that is heard in one of the preview trailers, that they were going to have Rocky's English-speaking voice quaver like a human's to convey emotion, but for the most part, the voice we hear in the movie is realistically that of an AI, i.e., not very wide-ranging in tone. Instead, Rocky expresses stress by repeating certain words (like the classic "Amaze! Amaze! Amaze!" or "Bad. Bad. Bad."). The rendering of Rocky's English grammar is uneven, but an in-universe explanation might be that the AI translating Rocky's tuneful utterances isn't perfect, which is why, at some points, Rocky seems to have a perfect understanding of human verb tenses while, at other points, he seems unable to conjure up the correct parts of speech. Overall, the movie does indeed catch all of the novel's major story beats, and on the general level, it's a good adaptation.

For people who've read the novel, though, the experience might be a little less positive. A lot gets left out from the book, some major story points are radically changed, and some new story elements not found in the book are added in. Let's talk additions first. One plot element that is added to the film version is a short scene in which Stratt watches video of Ryland Grace with his new Eridian friend Rocky. This repairs what I thought of as a plot hole in the book: I don't recall that Grace, in the novel, ever sends Earth evidence that sapient life exists elsewhere. This could be for prudential reasons: Humans in groups tend to ruin everything they touch, so Grace might be hesitant to let humanity know about the existence of the Eridians. But by including Rocky in a video in Lord and Miller's cinematic version, Grace gives the Eridians credit for helping him to solve the problem of how to get rid of astrophage. Another rather major and character-altering addition is a scene in which Eva Stratt, shortly before her astronauts are to launch on their one-way mission (and before the team's scientist is killed), sings a karaoke version of Harry Styles's "Sign of the Times" (which, frankly, I don't like—not Hüller's singing, but the song itself). The scene humanizes Stratt in a way the novel never does. In fact, the book version of Stratt is straitlaced, generally unsentimental (Stratt bitterly/resignedly muses that she will be jailed for all the stunts she's had to pull to save humanity), and contemptuous of Ryland Grace's cowardice when he refuses to be the replacement for the killed scientist. She admires Grace for his knowledge and teaching ability, but she doesn't respect him at all because, as she makes clear in the book, she took the measure of him and figured him for a coward from the moment she met him. The movie version of Stratt, compassionately played by Sandra Hüller, looks and feels much more weighed down by events, by the burden of having to coordinate a huge interplanetary mission and to send a group of people to their deaths. In the book, Stratt is also in charge of trying to preserve the earth's climate by enlisting a famous climate scientist to induce more global warming as a way to compensate for the sun's astrophage-induced cooling. In the movie, Stratt is much nicer to Ryland Grace; it almost feels, at certain moments, that there might be some romantic potential there. And when "movie Stratt" finally has to force her lead scientist onto the one-way mission, her expression is one of deep regret: she's hurt because she knows that Grace thinks she's betrayed him. A third addition was Grace's boarding of the Blip-A so he could see how a life form navigating by sound might build a vessel.

Several scenes from the book were flat-out missing from the movie; I assume these were cut for time and to keep the story both smooth and comprehensible to the average moviegoer. In no particular order: (1) the use of Beetles (little drones named after the Beatles—John, Paul, George, and Ringo—built to send information rapidly back to Earth at bone-crushing acceleration) as attitude jets to compensate for damage to the Hail Mary; (2) the movie makes no mention of the "coma gene" that allows 1 in 7000 people to undergo long-term comas more or less without ill effects, and which is one reason why Grace—who has the gene—is forced into the mission team; (3) Grace and Rocky's discussion, toward the end, about how similar human and Eridian life are in terms of sapience and social realities, leading to a tentative conclusion in support of the panspermia theory of life-seeding throughout the galaxy; (4) the humorous subplot about Dr. Dubois (the black doctor killed in the astrophage explosion), who is Spock-like in his literalism and perfectly open about falling into a sexual relationship with his backup scientist; (5) the humorous incident in which Dubois confesses that he (and everyone else) had quietly assumed that Grace and Stratt were in a sexual relationship given how closely they worked together; (6) the book's conclusion on Erid, Rocky's homeworld, which leaves off some crucial details, like how the transparent biodome built in gratitude by the Eridian government gives a view of nothing but inky blackness; (7) how Grace subsists on a diet of "meburgers," i.e., cloned meat made from his own cells, or (8) how Erid's 1.5 g (because of its larger mass) affects Grace's aging over the years (he ends up needing a cane). (9) In fact, Grace's 1.5-g acceleration in the Hail Mary isn't shown at all; a whole chapter in the book is devoted to how, as Grace travels to Tau Ceti, he "feels" something wrong with his environment and deduces, through science, that he's experiencing extra g-forces, which leads to his further conclusion that he must be out in space. In the movie, Grace almost immediately has access to windows and scopes, and he can see that he's no longer in Kansas. The movie also doesn't give a clear notion of the time jump from Grace's arrival at Erid to the movie's final scene. The movie does show by implication that some time has passed: A complete biodome has been built to house Grace (better furnished than in the novel), but no mention is made of the thankful Eridian government, or the fact that Eridians in authority (and, presumably, others as well) communicate via a sort of communal telepathy that Grace whimsically calls "the thrum" when arriving at collective decisions.

There were also some outright changes from the book to the movie: In the movie, Grace isn't given the chance to remember his name on his own after he wakes up with amnesia: The ship's AI supplies his name to him. Also: The corpses of his teammates, who have been dead for years when Grace wakes up, aren't nearly as desiccated as they should have been. Third: When Grace encounters the Blip-A (Rocky's ship), the maneuvers that Grace does (in the book, he never tries to evade the Blip-A) aren't the same at all.

Even though the movie mentions Grace's paper on xenobiology—the one that got him in trouble for arguing that alien life doesn't have to be associated with water—it fails to follow through with the fact that Rocky, as it turns out, is proof of the correctness of Grace's thesis: While we do see, in the movie, that Rocky bleeds mercury, there's no explicit mention in the film that Rocky's blood is essentially mercury, and that his biology contains no water at all (Eridians eat minerals, and they consider the act of eating both private and fairly disgusting—something the movie depicts in one humorous scene).

Also unclear to me: In the book, the aircraft carrier that Grace ends up on is Chinese; is it also Chinese in the movie? Whenever I get a chance to rewatch the film (probably when it's on streaming), I'll check out the writing on the carrier's walls to see what language it's in. In the book, the carrier is Chinese (as in The Martian, Andy Weir ropes the Chinese in again). And one more thing that is unclear to me from both the book and the movie: If Eridians initially "don't know about radiation," as Grace says in the movie, how did they perceive the Petrova Line, i.e., the astrophage-created band of infrared radiation connecting a sun to a planet with CO2 in its atmosphere? There are many other unclear things, but most of them are inherent to the original story; they reveal themselves in Andy Weir's novel and are reflected implicitly or explicitly in the movie, e.g., How do Eridians have the same range of emotions that humans do (e.g., recognizable anger, sadness, disgust, alarm, joy, and feelings of friendship)? Why does Eridian impatience and directness sound almost exactly like the frank, honest rudeness of a Korean ajumma? In the movie, when Rocky comes into the Hail Mary and complains about how messy Grace has left the place, how does the Eridian sense or notion of neatness/tidiness map so closely onto the human sense? And in terms of infection control: If Earth and Erid are now saved, what about the rest of the galaxy?

Despite all of the differences noted above, I saw two very interesting parallels. First, we have to talk about the Interstellar thing because a lot of other reviewers immediately brought this up. Not having seen Project Hail Mary when I first learned of these parallels, my first thought was to reject them outright: These are two fundamentally different stories. After seeing Hail Mary, though, I now understand why people have been making that connection: If we leave aside the generic "save the world" impetus that both films have in common, it all really comes down to one dramatic scene in which the Hail Mary is skimming the atmosphere of the planet Adrian in an attempt to collect an organism that Grace names taumoeba, a predator that kills astrophage and is the solution to Earth and Erid's problems. The Hail Mary loses control partly thanks to Grace's shaky piloting skills and partly because the astrophage in one of his ship's fuel tanks bursts out into space in an attempt to migrate to Adrian's CO2-rich atmosphere so as to breed (astrophage, when it moves, moves at almost the speed of light). The ship goes into a high-gee spin reminiscent of a similar scene in Interstellar. Grace is knocked out by the violence of the spin (trivia: remember that centrifugal force might not be a thing), and Rocky—who can't survive in an Earth-like atmosphere—breaks out of his protective, geodesic "spacesuit" to rescue Grace at severe cost to himself. Now, it should be said that, other than this one scene, I still see no reason to draw parallels with Interstellar. But I can understand, given the emotional power of both scenes in both movies, why people might make that connection. The second parallel is weirder. In both the novel and the movie, Ryland Grace ends up on Erid and goes back to doing what he did on Earth: teaching children. Only now, his students are all young Eridians. The movie ends with all of his kids raising their hands when Grace asks them a question about the speed of light; he's obviously bent on teaching Eridians everything he knows about radiation. What's funny (in the sense of being both strange and humorous) is that Ridley Scott's 2015 movie version of Andy Weir's 2011 The Martian also ends with an epilogue on Earth, with Matt Damon's astronaut Mark Watney asking his class if they have any questions. The whole class raises their hands—roll credits. And this movie ends on the exact same beat. What makes director Scott's choice to do this seem almost prophetic is that the classroom epilogue isn't in Andy Weir's novel. The novel ends in space. I doubt I'm the only one to remark on this strange and interesting parallel.

Project Hail Mary got plenty right, though. Rocky's insistent, persistent personality is spot on. Stratt might have been radically changed, but her basically no-nonsense nature is still visible. Ryland Grace is portrayed pretty much as he is in the books—as an affable, knowledgeable coward who has to go through a trial to grow a spine. The movie's portrayal of g-forces isn't quite book-faithful, but whenever the Hail Mary goes into centrifuge mode to create artificial gravity, those scenes are done well. When Rocky steps into the Hail Mary's Earth atmosphere to rescue Grace, his carapace begins smoking dangerously (Eridian body temperature is incredibly high), which is depicted exactly how I imagined it from reading the book. And while Rocky himself doesn't look quite as craggy as my own imagination made him, the puppeteering/CGI team that brought him to life did a great job of ensouling what could have been an utterly blank, unexpressive character. Overall, I was impressed.

I didn't come away thinking Project Hail Mary was the best film I've ever seen, but many of the questions I brought up in this review, along with the flaws I mentioned, are more rooted in the original novel than in the story we see unfolding on screen. I would definitely confirm that this movie deserves to be seen on the big screen. It's big, bold, brave, and beautiful, and it's told with humor and heart. It also works despite having a very limited cast of main characters (Grace, Stratt, Rocky), and that's a testament to the quality of the story itself. Whether the story counts as "hard science fiction" is difficult for me to say since I'm no scientist. But it doesn't trip the usual plausibility alarms. I'm just trying to remember whether the space scenes have any sound in them. Sound in space is the undoing of many sci-fi stories. That issue aside, I do recommend that you see this movie. It's a very good ride.


The Critical Drinker tells the sad tale of Kristen Stewart

I've said this before, but it bears mentioning again: I think Kristen Stewart is a talented actress when given the right material and pushed by the right director. Her performance in Spencer proved she was Oscar-caliber (if that means anything anymore). And when I first saw her, years ago, in a little 2007 movie called In the Land of Women, I thought she was charming. Stewart has potential. She gets a lot of shit for wooden performances lately, but I think she often defaults to quiet subtlety, which gets misread as woodenness. Anyway, the Drinker is right that Stewart went off the deep end. In recent times, she's said some amazingly stupid things that make me question her character. So it's only appropriate to chronicle her personal and career collapse since her enstupidation became apparent.




anyone else find this disappointing?

Watch this video and see whether you end up as disappointed as I did. I'm not talking about the Cthulhu commentary, which is insightful, but rather the artistry. To me, it looks like a case of The Artist Who Can't Leave Well Enough Alone. The guy is making a picture of Cthulhu as he narrates, and its awesome up to about 70-80% of the way through it, then the guy starts adding white paint as a contrast (I think he started off with dark watercolors and, bizarrely, ended with acrylics or oils).

When my mother was president of her Korean-American Women's Society (yes, KAWS, like the grating sound of a crow), she once invited a Korean artist to come and exhibit many of his works. Mom begged me to help her and the artist set the exhibit up; typical of my selfish-yet-pliant nature, I rolled my eyes in exasperation (Jesus, not this again) and helped her. The artist turned out to be a chatterbox in Korean; I did my best to follow what he has saying, but I'm not sure I understood much. Finally, he offered to do a large painting right then and there. He chose a large sheet of hwaseonji (paper used for calligraphy and brush art), then loaded up the brush with ink and went to town. It wasn't obvious what he was making at first, but it didn't take long for a galloping horse to appear, charging straight at the viewer. It was, frankly, magnificent—dynamic and full of life. My own austere sensibility started shouting Enough! when I thought the horse-image had reached peak awesomeness... but the artist kept going until the horse was almost lost in a jumble of other swooping, smoky lines that symbolized God-only-knows-what. By the time the artist finished the artwork to his satisfaction, the whole thing looked like a scribbled, unprofessional mess to me. Maybe I'm just artistically stupid, but as with the Cthulhu video above, I wish the artist had known when to stop.

Am I too austere? Too ignorant of real art to appreciate it?

All I know is that I like what I like.


Christmas movie




"It's them! Blast 'em!"




so indescribably bad

I slap these bad puns up just to torture myself. 


Can we talk about the terrible handling of the speech balloons?


Sunday, March 29, 2026

keto breffus sammiches, Day 2

I confess I've eaten a lot this weekend. It was all keto, but I can't hide behind the "keto" label after gobbling down so many calories. Like it or not, calories do still matter, even on keto. And as a result of this orgy of eating, I gained weight and even felt some angina this evening. Ugh.

Anyway, I'm fasting all day Monday and most of Tuesday, then meeting people for dinner Tuesday evening. I will, by that time, have seen Project Hail Mary, which is part of the reason for the meet-up: to talk about the movie. I guess Wednesday won't be an eating day; I'll just eat again on Saturday.

As you might imagine, though, the brief photo essay below has nothing to do with science fiction. Just enjoy the pics, the captions, and the commentary.

waffle iron, no Pam non-stick spray this time

My waffle iron (it's American and uses a 110V plug, so I have to plug it into one of my "down" transformers) has a non-stick interior. I'd been spraying Pam into it to "grease" the thing up in preparation for my keto-waffle batter, but today, I did an experiment with the first waffle to see whether it could be removed without difficulty: I didn't use any Pam. And—there was no problem. So I made six waffles without any difficulty.

thick, sludgy keto-waffle/pancake batter—a heaping spoonful per waffle

I don't know whether this is actually true, but it strikes me that pancake and waffle batter are essentially the same sort of batter. That's certainly been true of the keto batter I use: the recipe is for pancake batter, but I've used the exact same recipe in my little waffle iron (about four minutes per waffle), and it makes for perfect waffles. These waffles, if eaten right away, are too soft: they need to cool down and harden a bit to have a better texture. For those desiring an Eggo-style crunch, the cooled waffles can be put into a toaster set to a high enough heat to guarantee a decent browning. I thought my waffles came out great. And no, these weren't keto "chaffles" (waffles made with a base of mozzarella or Jack or some other cheese)—these were waffles with an almond-flour base (plus eggs, cream cheese, baking powder, salt, BochaSweet, cinnamon, and heavy cream). Behold:

after eight minutes

24 minutes, and done

I promised you a look at my blueberry "jam" (also keto):

This was mixed with melted butter.

Here's a naughty peek under a skirt of American cheese:


heading off to the microwave for a final heating

side view, bacon sandwich in front

side view, homemade sausage patties in front

The breakfast sandwiches worked out well, and on top of those, I had my standard two grocery salads (the downstairs grocery was open after all). I don't expect my blood sugar to be that great tomorrow: even though I ate nothing but keto food today, I ate a lot of it, and quantity can spike your insulin almost as much as carbs can.

But everything tasted good. The waffles are soft enough that I think a savory version might work should I decide to make keto hamburgers ever again.


Larry Niven dealt with these questions years ago

Read Larry Niven's "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex."




always looking for a new gyro (or gyro-ish) recipe




discussion re: the new Spider-Man trailer

I might watch this, but I'm pretty much done with Marvel.




Happy Palm Sunday

Holy Week begins for the believers. Today is Palm Sunday, so Happy Palm Sunday!

Of course, we now know that velociraptors were the size of chickens, so the above tableau could have been much more ridiculous.

Easter Sunday next week. While the Buddha's birthday sometimes coincides with the Passover/Easter season, Siddhartha Gautama Shakyamuni's birthday is celebrated in Korea this year on May 24 (Sunday).


Dave Cullen on reasons for the Buffy reboot's cancellation

I saw the movie when it came out, but I never saw the TV series.




sneak peek

Bollocks! Henry Cavill speakin' like a Scot? Well, he doesn't have to: In the original Highlander, Christophe Lambert—a French-American actor—played Connor McCleod as a man who had lived for centuries and had a "mixed" or "muddled" accent from all of the places where he'd lived. Cavill can easily do the same.




Saturday, March 28, 2026

today's lunch (in part)

Saturday's lunch was a combination of keto breakfast sandwiches and two grocery-store salads (not pictured below), and I have enough sandwich material left over for tomorrow. I made my usual breakfast-sausage patties, but with regular BochaSweet instead of brown sugar (I'm out of BochaSweet brown sugar). I also cooked up some thick-cut bacon (sliced into lardons) and made some blueberry jam with cinnamon, lemon juice, and BochaSweet. Lastly, I used my waffle iron to make keto waffles from an almond-flour base (plus eggs, heavy cream, cream cheese, salt, baking powder, cinnamon, and yes—more BochaSweet). Oh, right: I also added a slice of American cheese to each sandwich. You can see the results below. My pancake/waffle recipe, found online, barely makes six waffles, i.e., three sandwiches.

sausage, egg, cheese, and bloob-jam sandwiches

I see that the bloob jam isn't visible. I'll provide a picture tomorrow.

side view

third sammich, with bacon

horizontal view

The sandwiches were good and filling. I then had myself a big salad (well, two small salads combined into one big one, with added leftover bacon). Tomorrow, since the grocery will be closed, I'll grab salads from Paris Baguette. Unless it's closed, too, but it usually isn't. 

Normally, my meals on eating days are a lot simpler (Sat., Sun., Wed.): just my salads plus a 250-gram (half-pound) salmon steak that I poach by immersing in boiling water (still wrapped in its packaging), then allowing to simmer for 14 minutes before extracting the fish, opening the package, and enjoying the flaky perfection. I added only lemon juice, salt, and pepper, and that's a perfectly decent hunk of fish. 

So today was and tomorrow will be something of a keto treat. And yes, berries in moderation are okay on keto thanks to their fiber content, which helps to protect one from their fructose content. Other keto-friendly berries include strawberries, raspberries, and blackberries.

There might be more pics tomorrow. 


E-words quiz

I missed a few of the esoteric ones related to England.




on FL teaching and learning

[from an Instapundit comment I'd left... here, slightly edited]

Learning English remains a mania here, but Koreans insist on backwards and antiquated ways of teaching and learning FL, which is why they continue to score around 2 or 3 (out of 5) on the two types of TOEFL essays (integrated and writing for academic discussion), and why they can learn English for ten years, then go to America, the British Isles, Australia, New Zealand, or South Africa and realize they can neither understand English nor speak it. The Koreans who do well with English are the ones who live overseas long-term in anglophone countries. And even then, many go overseas and isolate themselves in "Little Korea"s and never bother to learn the language of their host country.

Korean nationalism does come into play though. But it usually takes the form of wanting to replace those horrible foreign teachers with AI-driven robots. Foreign teachers here generally have the reputation of not knowing much about grammar (or much else technical about English); those teachers often correct the students while using vague justifications like "that sounds better" or "it's less awkward" or "it flows better" because they can't quote the relevant rules, and the students can smell this ignorance.

Also: most FL-teaching emphasis in the West, these days, is on oral proficiency to get students speaking coherently much earlier in the process. I'm in partial agreement with this emphasis, but I've seen the disadvantages: I learned French the old-fashioned way with grammar charts, choral repetition, scripted conversation, etc. One of my brothers went to the same high school I did; by that point, the old-guard teachers had been replaced by the oral-proficiency crowd, and I was really impressed with my brother's ability to speak French by level/year 2 or 3. But I quickly noticed that the quality of his French writing was utter shite, and that's part of the problem with not stressing grammar or correcting students' errors. Grammar is important because it aids in clarity of thought and expression.

I don't know what the answer to the teaching/learning problem is even after years of FL teaching. (I started off as a French teacher, then moved to Korea and used my FL-teaching skills to become an English teacher. I spent the last decade as a content creator, not a teacher, but I'll soon be going back into teaching.) I suspect the answer is some sort of middle ground: Korean students in particular need more emphasis on productive macroskills like speaking and writing; they do way too much listening and reading, and none of it is helping because the style of Korean instruction is to take a super-analytical approach to foreign languages. Compounding this problem is that the Korean analytical approach to English is often just plain wrong. Did you ever hear, for example, that there are only five sentence types in English (see chart below)? I can guarantee you that there are a lot more than five.

So a lot needs to change in Korea if Koreans really want to learn English fast and well. My own humble suggestions, after years in country, would be:

1. Korean instructors need to be fluent in English before they can teach, and their fluency should be tested by native-level speakers of English.
2. The Korean curriculum needs to emphasize productive macroskills (speaking, writing) as much as it emphasizes receptive macroskills (listening, reading).
3. The Korean curriculum needs to be stripped of false notions about English (like "There are only 5 English sentence types").
4. The foreigners who are hired to teach English should pass rigorous tests of linguistic competency—not just grammar—before they ever step into a Korean classroom. Too many foreign teachers are just 20-something kids fresh out of college, just looking to earn money so they can backpack all over Asia. It's an old story. Yawn. And it adds to the already-bad reputation of foreign teachers in Korea. And since Korean "cram schools" (hagweon/학원) are fundamentally businesses and not centers of education, they don't care whom they hire—just put a white face in the classroom, preferably somebody thin and good-looking. And if the foreigner isn't white, well, good fookin' luck. I'd say hire only the linguistically competent.
5. While I would never suggest an obsessive focus on grammar in particular (it produces a "missing the forest for the trees" effect), I should note the irony that many Koreans say, "We know English grammar better than Westerners do," then when they speak or write, 95% of their many, many errors are grammatical in nature. They've been trained to recognize grammar patterns but not to produce them in any reliable way, and these are two totally separate skills.

But I despair of ever seeing major changes like the above. There's a pervasive cultural conservatism/inertia here, and not the good kind of conservatism. Koreans will continue to want to learn English, to learn it badly (because that's how it's always been done), to suffer at the hands of incompetent Korean and foreign teachers, and to pine for the ever-hoped-for AI robots so they can chase the fuzzy little furriners off the peninsula.

Oh, yeah—that sentence-type chart:


[new material starts here]

Want me to list off some sentence types for you the way Americans learn them (or at least used to learn them)?

  1. simple sentence
  2. compound sentence
  3. complex sentence
  4. compound-complex sentence
  5. interrogative sentence (verb-first form is not even shown on the above chart)*
  6. infinite combinations of the above joined by conjunctions, etc.

That's just off the top of my head. The AI god adds moods and clause types:

English sentences are categorized by structure (simple, compound, complex, compound-complex) and by purpose/function (declarative, interrogative, imperative, exclamatory). The four structures mix independent and dependent clauses, while the four functional types determine if a sentence makes a statement, asks a question, gives a command, or shows emotion.

Once you start mixing, matching, and adding complexity, the number of English "sentence types" is uncountable. To reduce them to only five types, and to use a weird typology in doing so, is at best vaguely insulting, and at worst harmful to EFL students. What would Koreans think if I presented an oversimplified chart of supposed Korean sentence types?

__________

*Interrogatives can be written as declaratives, but with a question mark on the end.

• You're going fishing?
• He said what?

—but where in the above chart do you see the grammar for

Do you have a name?

The Vaux + S + Vmain + Odir structure is not on the chart. Interrogatives are sentences, too. I would humbly submit that the chart is crap. And if there's one chart like this, there are others.


ululate!

You're a slacker! was a much better line than Your ego is writing checks your body can't cash. That latter one gets my vote for Stupidest Line of the Century. In the late 1980s, if you needed someone to play the quintessential irritated hardass, Tolkan (whose name I didn't know until just a few minutes ago) was your man. RIP.




dog drama and shenanigans




how about this for a restaurant idea?

You're Korean. You come into my restaurant, the Grammar Hut (name subject to change). You see from the signs and posters that you get a 10% discount for ordering in English. There's also a chance for you to get a 20% discount on your next order if you take and pass a grammar quiz, one that is different for every person and changes daily. You order in English, receive congratulations and your 10% discount, then eat your meal. After the meal, you go over to the carrel- or arcade-style booth to take the grammar test (maybe it's on a touch screen; maybe it's more old-school), which is relentlessly in English. A proctor is there to monitor that you're not cheating. You take the quiz and pass. You receive a chit with a QR code and instructions to go back to the counter and have it scanned. You're told not to throw the QR code away so it can be re-scanned the next time you come in to order your food and confirm your 20% discount. If, next time, you order in English and bring your QR code, you get a 30% discount. This cycle can repeat until you hit ten "passes" of the grammar test. Since you are scanned in and on record, if you take and pass the quiz ten times, you will get a 50% discount off your next order. At 100 "passes," it's a 60% discount off the next order.

The menu is good but eclectic. Basically, it's the shit I cook: burgers, shoestring fries, potato chips, Moroccan-inspired chicken, spaghetti, chili, chili dogs, lasagna, tacos, nachos, ddeokbokgi, gyros, boeuf bourguignon, various soups and stews (some Korean), breakfast items, and desserts (cakes, pies, cookies), maybe some keto selections. A happily varied menu that doesn't know what it wants to be when it grows up. Think: Silver Diner in the US. Or the Cheesecake Factory.

Does this sound like the start of a decent business model? Poke holes in my idea in the comments. This grammar-nerd stuff would probably work in Korea. Not so much in the States, where people just don't give a fuck.


trending recently: "seahorse emoji" and AI hallucination

"Yes, you're right. It never existed." Creeping ever closer to "I'm sorry, Dave."




funny thought

I watched this and thought: China's answer to the crunch wrap.




I absolutely agree

Everything this guy says is spot-on. I completely agree with his entire spiel. It's at the heart of the problem with Korean English testing, and it's a problem for the years-long trendy thinking in FL-teaching circles that tra-la-la oral-proficiency curricula can just rely on people "watching soap operas" to really learn a language. He's also right that language learning should involve stress, effort, and discipline, and that the priority shouldn't be to try to make the learning (well, "learning") as smooth and easy as possible. You can't really learn or improve on anything unless you pressure-test. Sure, learning shouldn't be a thoroughly unpleasant experience, but it also shouldn't be absolutely free of pain and effort, either. Develop your active macroskills along with your passive macroskills. Yes—that's the key.

One thing, though: I'm not sure I agree with how he reckons with Stephen Krashen. I may need to watch the video again to see whether I've understood him correctly, but it sounded to me as though he were making Krashen out to be someone he's not. Otherwise, in terms of language-learning philosophy, I think everything this gentleman says is absolutely correct. What a relief to know I'm not the only one thinking this way.


Friday, March 27, 2026

Dave Cullen on undead Val




"Porkahontas"

If you're fat and easily insulted, please don't click on this.


the rats find out

Too bad there was no English equivalent to Saint Patrick to drive all the rats out of England. Instead, it's up to the gunners. Or as they call themselves, the rat busters.




when you accidentally find a playground... in hell

Run away! Run away!




today's agenda

Now that I'm done with the blog-slog, and I've written my book review of Destiny of the Republic, it's back to work. I need to create the rest of the Substack material that'll last through April, then get back to working on my movie-review book. I also need to repopulate my blog's scheduled posts and, if possible, get cracking on making some videos. We'll see how all of that goes.


unobtainium and space-whale brain juice




the turd attempt

Not mine, I'm ashamed to say. Image found here.
For da turd toyme, I fired a missile into the toilet this morning, and it clogged the toilet. It wasn't even a huge one—it just happened to lodge itself into the toilet's throat just right, preventing a full flush. Luckily, all I needed to unclog the toilet was the plunger. Three pumps, and the blockage was gone.

The shittiest(!) part of using the plunger is having to clean it afterward. You hold it suspended in the toilet water, hit the flush, shake the plunger around while the "clean" water swirls around it, then move the plunger over to the sink to give it a working-over with soap and, if you have it, some sort of cleaning spray like Windex. Both the rubber head and the handle, which has been baptized with shit-water. Then you have to clean your sink.

With that problem out of the way, I can go about my... business.


slummin' with Sackhoff

Watch Katee and her Canuck hubbie react to a two-decades-old series, which Katee is only now watching through for the first time. Their leftism does slip through on occasion, but hey, it was a leftie show. I loved it anyway. My humongous, comprehensive review is here.