Matt Walsh thinks "Revenge of the Sith" sucks. He's not wrong, but there're replies.
Poorly acted and directed, 2005's "Revenge of the Sith" was the best of the lame prequel trilogy. The previous two films had set a very low bar. Walsh isn't wrong to point out the awful performances, the unwieldy dialogue, and the plot holes. Do you think the two defenders of the movie, Ben Shapiro and Star Wars Theory, adequately reply to Walsh?
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.
Andy writes:
ReplyDeleteIt’s a chicken-and-egg problem: Disney sequels are so bad, lefties demand everything else be called Good, because of Reasons. But Reality demands Bad still exist in a more contemporary world of Worse.
Andy