I recently posted some thoughts about how Donald Trump would be a national-security nightmare if he became president. All of that is counterfactual, of course: Trump isn't president yet, hence the conditional "would be." Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, has a proven and ever-growing record as an actual national-security nightmare, and the latest horror is the execution by hanging of nuclear scientist Shahram Amiri—an execution that is very likely the result of two emails from 2010 that were transmitted via Hillary Clinton's jury-rigged server. For a closer look at the whole sordid affair, see here.
Thursday, August 11, 2016
national-security nightmare, Hillary edition
2 comments:
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?" -- HRC
ReplyDelete"National security" is of no concern when one does not believe in the nation-state.
ReplyDelete