I'm not alone in thinking that our political system has produced two unpalatable alternatives. This belief, by the way, has nothing to do with mentally sloppy moral relativism: you can, without contradiction, believe two people to be equally unpalatable, but in completely different ways. That's how I see our current pair.
Thomas Sowell, critical of both Clinton and Trump.
Neo-neocon (rejecting Sowell's gun analogy but agreeing with his stance).
Meanwhile, Dr. Vallicella on why you should vote Trump despite the fact that the menu is nothing but shit sandwiches.
Saturday, August 06, 2016
when the menu is nothing but shit sandwiches
1 comment:
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Seems quite a few more people agree with Dr. Vallicella:
ReplyDelete"Trump Tromps Clinton in Social Media Support"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pXLGdVlxqk