Here it is-- "Slash and Burn":
My answer will eventually appear in the comments.
_
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
1 comment:
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No one likes a fraction made out of fractions, so we've got to do something to make the fraction in Quantity B look a little more civilized. The denominators in that fraction are n, 3x, and x, so the least common denominator is 3nx.
ReplyDeleteWhen I multiply the fraction by (3nx/3nx), I get a simpler-looking fraction:
12x/(n + 15n) = (3/4)(x/n)
At this point, it's just a matter of plugging in numbers. We know that x and n have to be nonzero quantities, but we're not told whether they might be positive or negative. So let's try some combinations of x and n that cover the major possibilities:
x = 1, n = 1 (+/+)
x = -1, n = -1 (-/-)
x = -1, n = 1 (-/+)
x = 1, n = -1 (+/-)
For the first pair:
A = 1
B = 3/4
A is greater than B.
For the second pair:
A = 1
B = 3/4
A is greater than B.
For the third pair:
A = -1
B = -3/4
B is greater than A.
For the fourth pair:
A = -1
B = -3/4
B is greater than A.
By plugging in simple numbers like 1 and -1, we quickly see that there are times when A is greater, and times when B is greater.
The answer is D: The relationship cannot be determined from the information given.
Or so I say, anyway.