One problem that I encountered while tutoring my goddaughter stumped me, and I'm still working on it. It was one of a set of problems for which the instructions were these:
Given the following information, determine which lines, if any, are parallel. State the postulate or theorem that justifies your answer.
The accompanying image shows this:
For problem #2 of the aforementioned set, we're given only this information:
Angle 10 is congruent to angle 16.
I'm pretty sure there's some way to establish that lines C and D are parallel, but because we're given no information about lines M and N, I don't think we can prove they're parallel.
Normally, to prove that two lines are parallel, we look for certain data:
1. If corresponding angles are congruent, the lines are parallel. In the above illustration, the following pairs of corresponding angles would, if congruent, prove lines C and D are parallel: 9 & 13, 10 & 14, 11 & 15, 12, & 16.
2. If alternate interior angles are congruent, the lines are parallel. The following angle pairs would, if congruent, prove lines C and D are parallel: 11 & 14, 12 & 13.
3. If alternate exterior angles are congruent, the lines are parallel. The following angle pairs would, if congruent, prove lines C and D are parallel: 9 & 16, 10 & 15.
4. If consecutive interior angles are supplementary, the lines are parallel. The following angle pairs, if added together for a sum of 180 degrees, would prove lines C and D are parallel: 11 & 13, 12 & 14.
Intuitively, I know that, if angles 10 and 16 are congruent, the only possible configuration for these non-consecutive exterior angles lines is for them to be 90 degrees. But that's working the problem backwards: I need to show how they're 90 degrees, and that's where I'm stuck.
Here's what I can deduce (in an effort to establish that lines C and D are parallel):
1. ∠10 ≅ ∠16 (Given.)
2. ∠16 ≅ ∠13; ∠10 ≅ ∠11 (Vertical angles.)
3. ∠10 ≅ ∠13 (Transitive: ∠10≅∠16≅∠13.)
4. ∠13 ≅ ∠11 (Transitive: ∠13≅∠10≅∠11.)
5. ∠11 ≅ ∠16 (Transitive: ∠16≅∠10≅∠11.)
6. m∠11 + m∠12 = m∠13 + m∠14 = 180 (Steps 1-5, definition of supplemental angles.)
7. ∠12 ≅ ∠14 (Algebra. (a + b = a + c, ∴ b = c))
8. m∠10 + m∠12 = m∠15 + m∠16 = 180 (Steps 1-5, def. of supplementary angles.)
9. ∠12 ≅ ∠15 (Algebra. (a + b = a + c, ∴ b = c))
Feel free to write in with comments. If you have a short, sweet way to establish that lines C and D are parallel, I'm all ears. Meanwhile, I'll keep working at this on my own.
UPDATE, 3/19/12: Be sure to read this subsequent post. That the lines are parallel cannot be proven.
_
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.