Koreabloggers have been handling the Hwang cloning scandal (or quasi-scandal, or faux scandal) quite well, so I haven't felt the need to pile on further. Hwang's image is in trouble, if nothing else. I did, however, want to point out this article, which seems to plunge Hwang further into controversy.
Personally, I'm willing to give Hwang the benefit of the doubt until certain questions are clearly answered. I think we won't get real answers until an international team investigates the history of Hwang's experiments, and other teams follow his stated procedures minutely to determine whether they can achieve the same results. Such is the beauty of the scientific method: it works because of standards associated with repeatability and verifiability. Fakers get sniffed out eventually.
_
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
Dr. Hwang and more alleged fakery
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.