Monday, February 13, 2017

"a national-security nightmare"

Although I got the fundamentals utterly wrong during last year's election, I think I did call it when I referred to both Trump and Clinton as national-security nightmares. This article at the Observer seems to bear that conviction out. Trump needs to watch his six.

ADDENDUM: for balance, though, you might want to read the Instapundit comments in response to the article.

UPDATE: Michael Flynn, the security nightmare in question, is resigning his post. Good. May the next occupant of that position be chosen more carefully.



1 comment:

  1. The Observer, along with the rest of the "liberal" media in the UK and the US, have only one goal as far is Trump is concerned and that is to take him out by any means necessary. Anything they say must always be interpreted with that in mind. I trust them about as much as I would Pravda during the Brezhnev era.

    As far as national security goes, I find this much more disturbing. See also here.

    ReplyDelete

READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!

All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.

AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.