Sunday, March 04, 2018

English quirks: when comparatives work in reverse

Look at the following autobiographical paragraph:

I'm a fat guy, and I've always had a barrel chest. Even when I was thinner—I've never been thin, mind you, but I've been thinner than I am today—the area between my solar plexus and my navel has always been convex but muscular, despite a distinct lack of exercise. Strange but true: this is my life as a barrel.
Note the three highlighted words: thinner, thin, and thinner again. If you think about it, the two instances of thinner have somewhat different senses. The second thinner functions the way you'd expect it to: as a standard comparative of thin ("Bob is thin; Burt is thinner"). It's the first thinner, however, that operates a bit strangely: if we compare the first thinner to the thin, we realize that thin is describing a skinny Kevin who never was, while thinner is actually describing a fatter Kevin who did exist.

Kevin now and since forever: fat
Kevin 20 years ago: thinner than now (say, 90 kg)
Kevin never: thin, i.e., actually skinny (say, 60 kg)

So: thinner designates Kevin at 90 kg while thin designates Kevin at 60 kg. Bizarre, no?

You could argue, I suppose, that there's nothing strange or self-contradictory happening here because the thinner is clearly referring to "Kevin when thinner than now." Still, what the first thinner represents is a Kevin who is heavier than the hypothetically thin Kevin (see above), and I find that quite bizarre.

There has to be a name for this sort of topsy-turviness when using comparatives a certain way. Does anyone know the term for this phenomenon? It's probably some Greek word—a -phrasis or an -esis of some kind.



No comments:

Post a Comment

READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!

All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.

AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.