Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Nick Freitas on the Harris talking points re: JD Vance

I'm still not totally sold on JD Vance. Sure, he's a decent public speaker, but I'm not feeling the charisma. (This may, in fact, be one of the reasons why Trump picked him. Having a second alpha on the ticket would make Trump look bad.) I'm slowly making my way through Vance's bestselling Hillbilly Elegy, and even several chapters in, the book feels like a PowerPoint presentation of local Kentucky/Ohio history, with some colorful characters (mainly Mamaw, Papaw, and some uncles) but no actual plot. It's not so much a narrative as a pastiche, a series of loosely connected thoughts and images. It's well written, at least from a proofreader's perspective: the English is clean, with few to no typos, so I can thank Cthulhu for that. Otherwise, it's kind of a plotless slog: I keep expecting the narrative to pick up speed and go somewhere. On the brighter side, Vance is proving not to be a pushover as Donald Trump's running mate, what with his comments about "childless cat ladies" and such. Mentally, Vance is fast on his feet. Despite this, the latest "point" being made by the Harris-led opposition is that Vance is "weird." Here's Nick Freitas on that.

UPDATE: "weird" really is a campaign strategy:





No comments:

Post a Comment

READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!

All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.

AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.