Based on the figure, a right triangle, we're comparing the quantities abc and h(a^2 + b^2). Right away, thanks to Uncle Pythagoras, we know that the parenthetical expression can be converted to c^2.
Let's set up a "mysterious" inequality in which the letter Q represents "greater than, less than, or equal to." The first step of this mysterious inequality would be:
abc Q h(c^2) [based on our deductions]
We can then divide by c on both sides, giving us
ab Q ch
The length h is perforce less than either a or b. The length c, meanwhile, is perforce greater than a or b, but not necessarily greater than ab.
Hm.
Without actually looking up the properties of right triangles, I'd have trouble seeing how this problem could be solved without more information. So unless someone can swoop in with a better notion, I'm leaning toward (D): the relationship can't be determined from the information given.
But let's try something. Let's divide c into subsections x and y. Let's further assume a and b are equal, thus making x and y equal to each other. Length c can, in such a situation, be rewritten as 2x (or 2y). In this situation, h is at its maximal length relative to the legs and the hypotenuse, and we have a 45-45-90 triangle.
C can be rewritten as a√2. X and Y can each be rewritten as (a√2)/2. H can also be rewritten as (a√2)/2, because a 45-45-90 triangle is half of a square. The altitude becomes half a diagonal, just as X and Y are halves of a diagonal.
So:
abc = a*a*(a√2) =
(a^3)(√2)
And:
h(a^2 + b^2) =
h(c^2) = [(a√2)/2]*[(a√2)^2] =
[(a√2)/2]*(2a^2) =
(a^3)(√2)
Notice that, in a 45-45-90 situation, quantities A and B of the original problem are equal. But since we don't know whether the triangle we're looking at is that kind of triangle, we don't have the information we need to determine the answer. If lengths a and b are unequal, Quantities A and B will be unequal.
WHAT CORN AND PEANUTS ARE HIDDEN IN THE WARM AND STEAMING PILE? Vapid cultural commentary, pungent reviews, sundry Korea-related musings, fartological/scatological humor, political flatulence, and nondualistic Zen excretions in prose or poetry form.
Got a beef? Write the Hominid at bighominid@gmail.com, and put "HAIRY CHASMS" in the subject line, or your mail will be automatically trashed by Satan, my beautiful but deadly spam filter. Assume your mail will be published (editing at my discretion), unless you specify otherwise. Welcome to my backside.
BLOGROLLING POLICY: I don't do mutual linkage, and I have no problem with asymmetrical linkage: I link to bloggers who don't link back, and that's fine by me. Please DO NOT ask to be linked. Please DO NOT expect linkage just because you've linked to me. Also, if I don't link to you, please do not assume I think your blog sucks.
COMMENTS POLICY: My blog is my house; I'm responsible for keeping my dwelling clean. Commenters are guests, and guests of this blog will be civil, succinct, and relevant. All comments are subject to approval; I reserve the right to publish or not publish—in a pristine or altered form—all comments (and emails intended as comments) that I receive. Act like an asshole on my turf, and I'll make you look like the asshole you are. Be cool, and we won't have a problem. Simple, yes? And before I forget:
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. Take responsibility for what you say. Screen names are OK, but no sock puppetry. Use the same SN consistently.
1 comment:
Based on the figure, a right triangle, we're comparing the quantities abc and h(a^2 + b^2). Right away, thanks to Uncle Pythagoras, we know that the parenthetical expression can be converted to c^2.
Let's set up a "mysterious" inequality in which the letter Q represents "greater than, less than, or equal to." The first step of this mysterious inequality would be:
abc Q h(c^2) [based on our deductions]
We can then divide by c on both sides, giving us
ab Q ch
The length h is perforce less than either a or b. The length c, meanwhile, is perforce greater than a or b, but not necessarily greater than ab.
Hm.
Without actually looking up the properties of right triangles, I'd have trouble seeing how this problem could be solved without more information. So unless someone can swoop in with a better notion, I'm leaning toward (D): the relationship can't be determined from the information given.
But let's try something. Let's divide c into subsections x and y. Let's further assume a and b are equal, thus making x and y equal to each other. Length c can, in such a situation, be rewritten as 2x (or 2y). In this situation, h is at its maximal length relative to the legs and the hypotenuse, and we have a 45-45-90 triangle.
C can be rewritten as a√2.
X and Y can each be rewritten as (a√2)/2.
H can also be rewritten as (a√2)/2, because a 45-45-90 triangle is half of a square. The altitude becomes half a diagonal, just as X and Y are halves of a diagonal.
So:
abc = a*a*(a√2) =
(a^3)(√2)
And:
h(a^2 + b^2) =
h(c^2) = [(a√2)/2]*[(a√2)^2] =
[(a√2)/2]*(2a^2) =
(a^3)(√2)
Notice that, in a 45-45-90 situation, quantities A and B of the original problem are equal. But since we don't know whether the triangle we're looking at is that kind of triangle, we don't have the information we need to determine the answer. If lengths a and b are unequal, Quantities A and B will be unequal.
So I'm sticking with (D).
Post a Comment