Friday, June 21, 2024

I disagree

The anchor tries to make the case for elder abuse, but I don't buy it:

What I wrote in reply to the video:

Like so many commenters, and with respect, I have no sympathy for the "elder abuse" argument. When Joe had half his marbles, he said yes to running, and I'm sure it's his own stubborn, senile ego that keeps him from throwing in the towel for this newest election cycle. People around him (maybe not Jill) are doubtless suggesting that he step aside, but Joe won't do so, and until he does, it's all Joe all the time until he keels over or finally leaves the Oval Office. The best we can hope for is change in November.

The above isn't a very original thought; about half the comments to the video are in this same vein. No one has sympathy for old Joe. If you think he's being abused and he's not in control, then you can't blame him for the mess he's made. The anchor suggests blaming the cabal behind Joe, his puppeteers, but since we don't know who those people are, exactly, you're basically blaming no one. Better and simpler to blame Joe who, even if you won't admit it, still has enough marbles to make his own decisions. As long as Joe has the power of choice, he's morally on the hook for his actions. I definitely hold him accountable.



medical profession on the verge of collapse?

I'll believe there's a collapse when I see doctors earning peanuts:

Dr. Dhand has a rather stiff delivery, but his info is interesting.



ululate!

Canadian actor Donald Sutherland is dead at 88. I grew up watching his quirky, occasionally bug-eyed performances. He belongs in that special and paradoxical category of talented actors of limited range who basically play themselves in every movie—alongside other greats like Clint Eastwood, Bruce Willis, Gene Hackman, Sean Connery, Morgan Freeman, and Christopher Walken. Sutherland was hilariously memorable as Oddball in "Kelly's Heroes," and frightening as Matthew Bennell in "Invasion of the Body Snatchers." He could be funny, as he was in "Animal House," and it's almost impossible to think of anyone else in the role of Coriolanus Snow in the Hunger Games franchise. He also gifted the world with his son Kiefer, a bad boy off camera but a compelling actor like his dad, and the driving force behind one of my favorite TV series, "24." RIP, Mr. Sutherland.



God says "nope" to a building

Why people believe there are gods behind natural forces:





Thursday, June 20, 2024

some PJWs

Portal, misused:

Joe tries to look cool and competent, but...

The animals are all gay and trans!

When the model minorites aren't really models:





what happens when you're both outspoken and un-PC

Can't insult (well, tell the truth about) those rapey minorities, right?



fuckin' great

Headline:

Scientist warns daily use of Listerine Cool Mint mouthwash may increase risk of two deadly cancers

A [scientist] has warned Listerine may increase the risk of two deadly cancers and that people should not be using it every day. Daily gargling of the Cool Mint flavour was found to increase the level of two bacteria in the mouth in a recent study.

Both bacteria have previously been linked to oesophageal and bowel cancer.

It is believed that the alcohol in the mouthwash interferes with the normal level of bacteria in the mouth.

After three months of Listerine use, two species of bacteria – Fusobacterium nucleatum and Streptococcus anginosus – were found to be at much higher levels.

Scientists from the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, Belgium, also saw a decrease in a group of bacteria called Actinobacteria, which have previously been found to contribute to the regulation of blood pressure.

Professor Chris Kenyon, a scientist at the university who worked on the study, told The Telegraph that using the mouthwash “could increase their risk of cancer and various infections”.

He also claimed: “Most people should not be using it and if they do use it, they should use the preparations without alcohol and limit the use to a couple of days.”

I use Cool Mint Listerine all the time. Now they tell us? What about product testing and safety trials? I guess that would be too logical.

Time to move to natural alternatives.



triumph of the right: UK angle





"Godzilla Minus One": teeny version

This was funny—a frilled-neck lizard in Oz overdubbed to sound like a raging lunatic.



my tentative 2024 walk route is ready for viewing

2024 walk route: Nakdong River Gukto Jongju

The dates of the walk haven't been determined yet (I have some dummy dates on the calendar right now), but I'll settle that over the next few months. The Nakdong River trail is, officially, 385 km long (i.e., it's short), but my personal walk will involve some diversions to motels since I won't be biking the whole thing at one go. This means I'll be walking a total of 403 km, but that might get revised up or down as I verify distances between stopping points. Average distance between stops seems to be 22.4 km—shorter than the 26K average on the full Four Rivers route from Incheon to Busan. I've pampered myself, too: there will be only 14 walking days, but I've planned for 20 days total, i.e., 6 extra days of rest for my over-30K days. One of those days, early on, will be brutal: 40K, so I'll be earning a bit of extra rest for that segment.

Basically, the route is stitched together from (1) the Four Rivers route I've walked many times and (2) the Sangju-to-Andong route that I walked in 2022. Expect a Kevin's Walk 8 blog to appear over the coming months. I'm also thinking of creating a Camino blog that will need its own clever title (a little help, Mike—this is more your walk, after all!).

The route I've crafted for myself this year won't involve any camping, so I won't need my big backpack. That's nice: I can wear my wide-brimmed hat without worrying about interference from the smaller pack. Will I take my meds along...? If I'm still forced by the hospital to do insulin, I'll definitely be leaving that at home: insulin needs to be refrigerated (yet another of its many inconveniences), and I can't guarantee cold storage on the path. Otherwise, I'll have my usual pharmacopeia, a combination of dietary/nutritional supplements and pills from the hospital. (Depending on my intestinal situation this coming fall, I might be forced to leave my hospital-prescribed pills at home and walk three weeks like a normal person. The horror!)

I figured out a way to weave the path together into something coherent at Sangju City, where my two previously broken segments* must meet. This involved cutting out a ridiculously short 12K segment, and merging that segment into the segments before and after it, making for two 30-some-kilometer days in a row. The longer of the two days will include an extra day of rest, so no worries. My feeties will survive. And if, by some miracle, I'm feeling hardy enough not to need an extra day of rest, I'll shorten my calendar at my discretion.

We've come a long way since 2008, when I knew jack shit about distance walking. My feet, at least, have been pounded into condition, and mentally, I can stand walking anything up to 60 kilometers a day (cf. any of my "crazy walks" from my place in Seoul to Yangpyeong). How my heart and lungs will perform this year, I have no clue, which is why I have to train. But I'm really looking forward to this year's walk, short though it may be. Ending it at the Andong Dam means ending on a high note. Andong is close enough to Seoul that, when I finish the walk, I might just go back to my apartment that very same day instead of staying in Andong overnight. But we'll see. That sort of choice can be made on the fly. Korea is a first-world country with great transportation, so I'm not too worried.

__________

*Busan to Sangju and Sangju to Andong.



when the OG is the best





AI won't take over humanity anytime soon

AI is still retarded and likely will be for a while, so don't worry about Terminators killing your pets quite yet. Headline:

McDonald's was forced to kill its AI ordering program after viral screw-ups. Check out a few of the crazy examples.

An email to franchisees last week revealed that McDonald's is ending this test without any further expansion plans, and [they] are actively looking for a new tech partner to give this [automated-ordering] thing another shot.

"While there have been successes to date, we feel there is an opportunity to explore [voice-ordering] solutions more broadly," Mason Smoot, chief restaurant officer for McDonald's USA, told franchises in a message, according to Restaurant Business. "After a thoughtful review, McDonald's has decided to end our current partnership with IBM on AOT[,] and the technology will be shut off in all restaurants currently testing it no later than July 26, 2024."

"As we move forward, our work with IBM has given us the confidence that a voice-ordering solution for drive-thru will be part of our restaurants' future," McDonald's told Restaurant Business. "We see tremendous opportunity in advancing our restaurant technology and will continue to evaluate long-term, scalable solutions that will help us make an informed decision on a future [voice-ordering] solution by the end of the year."

McDonald's has been flirting with drive-thru AI since 2021, right after selling its McD Tech Labs to IBM. The goal was to see if a computer could speed up service. McDonald's is convinced that a future where a robot takes your order is inevitable — especially given things like Gavin Newsom's $20 minimum wage for the fast-food industry. But they also need the right AI technology that won't get confused when you ask for "no pickles."

Other fast-food chains like Checkers, Rally's, Wendy's, and Dunkin' are also diving headfirst into the AI pool, looking to replace human order takers with machines that won't complain about the minimum wage.

Be sure to visit the actual article to see the various embedded tweets and pictures of disasters as the AI fucks up everyone's orders. I see that McDonalds didn't work with Elon Musk on this. That's probably one big reason why everything failed.

And since when have you been able to request "no pickles" at McDonald's?



Wednesday, June 19, 2024

European "far right" victory in a nutshell

Fuck, the Nazis won!

Amala on all the electoral victories in Europe and what they really mean. Basically, Europeans support their own traditional culture and putting their own culture first, which is what sane people do, and the left can't stand that.



what the shit is this?

Security-camera footage of a horrific event that can't be labeled an "accident": a woman is pushing a baby stroller along a street; she obviously sees a car approaching, and she moves off to the side to make room; the car comes into view and quite deliberately plows into her and her baby. The view switches to a different camera and a different angle: the car is trying to get away, but an oncoming truck swerves into its path, causing a head-on collision and ensuring the criminal won't be getting away. A comment to the video provides a bit of context:

Driver was 16yo, on probation for poisoning a girl, car was stolen. He tried to kill that woman and her child. He was sentenced to 5 months in a youth camp, and his record will be expunged when he turns 18. His name is protected so no one will be able to be aware of this predator who has just gotten away with attempted murder for the second and third times.

That doesn't bolster my faith in the American "justice" system. As you see in the video, the stroller-pushing woman seems either unhurt or buoyed by shock and adrenaline: she gets right back up after being hit and checks on her kid. Lots of comments express admiration for her fortitude and maternal instincts.

Another comment offers a different, and slightly contradictory, update:

The driver of the stolen car was 15. The California court only gave him 7 months for the attempted double homicide. He was shot dead in an unrelated incident a year later. This is what being soft on crime does to a society.

Other updates note the mom and baby are doing fine. These updates also confirm the offending driver was shot dead a year or two later. At least he's off the streets, and I have one more reason never again to live in a large American city.



Hung Cao in the news again

I've written about Virginia-based military vet Hung Cao before. He just won the Virginia Senate GOP primary, and he'll be facing off against that goofball Tim Kaine.

Headline:

“Trump-Backed MAGA Stud” Hung Cao Wins Virginia Senate GOP Primary

Hung Cao, a retired officer in the U.S. Navy, won the Virginia Republican primary for the U.S. Senate on June 18. The Associated Press called the race for Mr. Cao shortly after polls closed in Virginia.

Mr. Cao, who earned an endorsement from former President Donald Trump, defeated four other Republican candidates: Jonathan Emord, Eddie Garcia, Scott Parkinson, and Chuck Smith.

Mr. Cao’s victory sets the stage for a November showdown with Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), a popular incumbent who’s best known to most Americans as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 2016 running mate.

Mr. Kaine is a political powerhouse in the Old Dominion State, where he won his most recent election in 2018 by roughly 16 points.

Mr. Cao initially ran for federal office in 2022, when he attempted to unseat Rep. Jennifer Wexton (D-Va.). Mr. Cao came within six points of winning the district, bringing Democrats’ 13-point lead from the previous election down to just a 6 percent gap, but was ultimately unsuccessful in his bid.

Former President Trump endorsed Mr. Cao on May 26, 2024.

In a post to Truth Social, former President Trump said that Mr. Cao “ will be a tireless fighter to stop Inflation, grow our Economy, secure our Border, strongly support our Incredible Military/Vets, and defend our always under siege Second Amendment.”

Despite liking former President Trump, some Republicans voters we spoke with in the district expressed reservations about the nominee.

Steve Robinson, 75, of Loudoun County, told The Epoch Times that he doubted Mr. Cao’s ability to win the election.

Mr. Robinson said he was backing Mr. Emord, a constitutional lawyer. He said if Mr. Emord were elected, it would at least be “possible,” if “unlikely” for Republicans to flip the seat.

“If we don’t select him, or we elect Cao as our candidate, unfortunately he couldn’t beat Jennifer Wexton in the last election, so there’s no way he could beat Tim Kaine.”

Mr. Robinson indicated that he thought the endorsement was an effort to win increased Republican support among minorities.

The political arithmetic represents an uphill battle for Mr. Cao. Virginians last sent a Republican to the upper chamber in 2002. The last statewide vote to send a Republican to federal office came in 2004, when Virginians voted to reelect President George W. Bush.

Don't be put off by the weird-sounding Vietnamese name. The surname Cao, it turns out, is just the Vietnamese pronunciation of the Korean surname Go (高), which means "high" or "superior." It's a noble name. So if you see the name Hung Cao, don't think "genitally gifted bovine." Then again, the guy is being called a "MAGA stud"...



ululate!

A tip of the hat to Willie Mays, ground-breaking slugger who just passed away at 93. He was considered one of the greatest baseball players of all time, not to mention a quiet and unassuming pioneer in the furtherance of racial equality (Mays was never outspokenly political). Given his importance to American history, it's sad to know he's gone. 

RIP, Mr. Mays.



discovery at Mount Vernon

Headline:

‘Blockbuster discovery’ found at George Washington’s Mount Vernon estate

Archaeologists at George Washington’s Mount Vernon have discovered dozens of glass jars filled with fruit preserves in the cellar of the historic Northern Virginia home that “likely haven’t seen the light of day since before the American Revolution.” 

Twenty-nine of the 35 bottles remain intact, and all contain either cherries, gooseberries or currants, the home and museum of the first U.S. president revealed in a press release Friday. 

“Never in our wildest dreams did we imagine this spectacular archaeological discovery,” Mount Vernon President & CEO Doug Bradburn said in a statement.

“We were ecstatic last month to uncover two fully intact 18th-century bottles containing biological matter. Now we know those bottles were just the beginning of this blockbuster discovery.”

Bradburn called the discovery an “unprecedented” find, adding, “nothing of this scale and significance has ever been excavated in North America. We now possess a bounty of artifacts and matter to analyze that may provide a powerful glimpse into the origins of our nation, and we are crossing our fingers that the cherry pits discovered will be viable for future germination. It’s so appropriate that these bottles have been unearthed shortly before the 250th anniversary of the United States,” which will be in 2026.

The discovery comes two months after two bottles were found that contained a “mysterious” liquid, along with cherries and pits.

[ ... ]

The newly found bottles have all been extracted from the five storage pits where they were found in the home’s cellar and the preserves are under refrigeration at the home’s archeology lab.

The artifacts will soon undergo scientific analysis in partnership with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service.

So far, 54 cherry pits and 23 stems have been identified, meaning the bottles were likely full of cherries when bottled.

[ ... ]

Bardburn said the bottles “likely haven’t seen the light of day since before the American Revolution,” and were possibly forgotten about when Washington left his home to lead the Continental Army during the Revolution. 

[ ... ]

“So sometime after 1758, but before 1776, someone dug a pit… sort of a rectangular, about a foot deep, hole through one of the floors in the cellar, these bottles were set in, and then it was filled with a dense clay.”

After the second discovery he added, “These extraordinary discoveries continue to astonish us. These perfectly preserved fruits picked and prepared more than 250 years ago provide an incredibly rare opportunity to contribute to our knowledge of the 18th-century environment, plantation foodways, and the origins of American cuisine. “

“The bottles and contents are a testament to the knowledge and skill of the enslaved people who managed the food preparations from tree to table, including Doll, the cook brought to Mount Vernon by Martha Washington in 1759 and charged with oversight of the estate’s kitchen.”

Washington moved to the home along the Potomac River after his marriage in 1759, and died there of a throat infection in 1799 at 67 years old. 

He served as president from 1789 until 1797, and is buried at the home.

Mount Vernon, George Washington's estate, is a bit more than a mile down the road from where I used to live. I've been on the property a few times, years and years ago.

Click over to the article and see the photos. Wild.



I'm a convert now

As I was grinding skirt steak for nachos last week, I finally understood better why you're supposed to run your meat through the grinder twice. It occurred to me in an epiphany—there had to be a better way of dealing with the remaining meat that gets caught in the grindworm (the corkscrew thingie in the grinder that pushes the meat forward to the chopper blades and the extruder) than the usual suggestions of feeding ice or bread into the grinder. When you feed the meat you've just ground back into the grinder, the remaining unground meat gets caught up and pushed out, and when it's time to pick out the meat still stuck in the grindworm, that meat turns out to be ground beef! Problem solved.

Of course, this is not the reason usually given for grinding your meat twice. No: the reason normally given is that twice-ground meat has a better texture for things like burgers. And that's definitely something I've noticed when grinding twice: the second grind produces better, more solid "meat spaghetti" than a single grind does. When the meat passes through the extruder a second time, what comes out looks almost as solid as Play-Doh being pushed through a plastic spaghetti-making die. The twice-ground meat also looks more like the meat you see in the grocery, where the grinders are industrial-sized and powerful. I only ever use the medium extruder plate when grinding meat; maybe I ought to try the small-holed extruder to produce some angel-hair ground beef. Might be interesting.



when you can't rely on police

I hope this wasn't fake.





it's a miracle!

Tuesday night: first walk since Sunday's almost-heart-attack. I marched straight out of the office, through the neighborhood between me and the Yangjae Creek, followed the Yangjae to where it met the Tan Creek, followed the Tan Creek out to the Han River, then turned around and marched to my place. Didn't stop once.

The walk route in itself wasn't special, and if I'm not mistaken, starting from the office made this a short 7K stroll (starting from my apartment = 9K). No—what made this walk special was that I experienced not a twinge of chest pain the entire time. I started walking and kept right on walking. So this leaves me to wonder: am I currently nitroglycerin powered? How long do the effects of a dose of nitroglycerin last, normally?

A quick and superficial bit of research reveals that nitroglycerin is a vasodilator: it widens and relaxes your constricted blood vessels, easing the heart's burden. The effect occurs within 1-5 minutes of placing the pill under the tongue... but I'm having a devil of a time finding information on how long nitroglycerin, as a chemical, stays in the body and keeps producing effects. This page suggests that, after the initial immediate effect, the tablet's metabolites (byproducts of metabolism) can remain in the body for longer. Whether these metabolites produce lingering effects is unclear. This page, and many like it, concentrates exclusively on unwanted side effects, not salubrious reactions.

Of course, I'm assuming that tonight's awesome walk (there were times when I felt I could have broken into a run) was thanks to the nitroglycerin. It might not have been: I also fasted all day yesterday and today (I did eat a keto snack late last night and again tonight after I got back from the walk), so it's possible that the lack of chest pain had to do with fasting and not the little miracle pill. But I've fasted and then walked before, and I can say with assurance that there was chest pain every time I did that. Walking totally pain-free, since leaving the hospital, is new to me.

Tonight was the first time I could walk at my usual, pre-hospitalization pace and not feel a blessed thing. The walk was special precisely because it was normal, and I'd almost forgotten what a normal walk could feel like. My next walk will be Thursday night; I'll be curious to see how that one goes. And no, I'm not going to try to narrow the variables down by taking another pill when I obviously no longer have to.

I'll report again with more bad theories after Thursday night's walk. In thinking out loud about the problem as I write this entry, I'm coming to realize that the lack of pain might not be thanks to that tablet. Maybe it was psychological: when I left the hospital, my heart had a clenched and tentative aspect to it, but after taking the nitro this past Sunday, my body "realized" it didn't need to clench so hard, so everything relaxed during tonight's walk. 

Hey, it's a theory.

When I see the docs on July 12, I'll ask them about the problem. Here's hoping I understand the answer: I'm at the limits of my Korean when I talk to docs.

Upshot: for the moment, I feel great. What a difference.



the perfect burger





Tuesday, June 18, 2024

when you're too stupid to get the math

Nick Freitas on how California likes to learn everything the hard way.



"Behold the Monster You Created"

A message to liberals:

Let us also not forget that you supported the Occupy takeovers of yester-decade. You supported the state rotunda takeovers by unionized thugs. You supported the BLM riots. You supported the CHAZ in Seattle and similar secessionist movements in other cities. You supported the attacks on churches and pregnancy centers after the Dobbs ruling. You supported the Stalinist show trial against Brett Kavanaugh, as well as the mob that tried to storm the Supreme Court to prevent his swearing-in.

You supported the attack by James Hodgkinson against Republican congressmen playing baseball. You supported the attack on Rand Paul by his neighbor. You supported the campus attacks against conservative speakers and activists. You supported every random street attack against anyone wearing a MAGA hat.

You supported every act of violence, censorship, social coercion, government repression, and outright insurrection so long as it was seen as beneficial to advancing your agenda and, more importantly, as long as it never affected you personally. These shock troops are disciples of the secular religion that you — yes, you, traditional liberals — have propagated for decades. With your winks and nods, you have taught them that trampling other people’s rights in pursuit of your cause du jour is both permissible and preferable.

And the entire time, you told us that “this is what democracy looks like.”

You are who Lenin accurately referred to as “useful idiots.” But I’m not so sure that you still support what democracy “looks like,” now that it “looks like” it has reached your front yard. When they scream that they want to burn the entire country to the ground, they mean exactly that. The monster that you constructed, animated, fed, riled up, and let roam free to dispatch your political enemies is now peering through your bay window, staring at you with a ravenous look in its eyes that evinces neither “solidary” nor “inclusion” with you.

Frankenstein’s monster always comes home to his castle.

Found here.



to those who scoff at paper ballots

Headline:

Paper ballots are hack-proof. It's time to bring them back.

I’ve been talking about the importance of protecting against voting-machine hacks since 2002. And now, finally, people are starting to take me seriously.

The move to paperless voting started in response to the Florida “hanging chad” fiasco in the 2000 presidential election. Some people (like me) thought this was a mistake, but such concerns were often dismissed. Now, apparently, you can’t be paranoid enough. As Politico’s Bob King noted, while 10 years ago critics of paperless voting were called paranoid, now both parties are worried.

It remains true that there is no actual evidence that a single vote was changed by hackers in the 2016 election. But even the possibility of hacking has served to promote the sort of conspiracy-mongering and political hatred that led to, for example, the shooting attack on Republican lawmakers last week. In a democratic polity, people have to believe that their votes are counted honestly, or the legitimacy of the system collapses.

And if we are to believe the latest NSA leaks on the subject, Russian (and other) hackers have been interested in American voting systems for a while, and that interest — contrary to Obama Administration assurances — didn’t decline after Obama made a “red phone” call to the Kremlin. (Perhaps even more troubling, many cyberattacks on state voting systems came from Department of Homeland Security computers.)

So what should we do? Well, we could try to boost our cybersecurity, but given that the NSA, the FBI and the CIA are leaking important secrets on a daily basis, maybe we’re not up to that job. So, once again, let me suggest that we return to something that, by its very nature, can’t be hacked by a guy in St. Petersburg: Paper ballots.

In some ways, paper and ink is a super technology. When you cast a vote on a voting machine, all that’s recorded is who you voted for. But a paper ballot captures lots of other information: Ink color, handwriting, etc. If you have access to a voting machine that’s connected to the internet, you can change all the votes at once. To change a bunch of paper ballots takes physical access, and unless you’re very careful the changed ballots will show evidence of tampering. Paper ballots aren’t fraud-proof, of course, as a century of Chicago politics demonstrates, but they’re beyond the reach of some guy sitting at a computer in a basement halfway around the world. And there are well-known steps to make Chicago-style fraud harder.

Perhaps it’s time to mandate paper ballots, and to also legally require other steps to ensure election integrity. Vote-counting systems should be transparent, and regularly audited. Voter ID should be strictly enforced, as it is in all advanced democracies to ensure that only eligible voters vote. And voter registrations should be audited frequently to ensure the removal of voters who have died or moved away. Maybe we should even dye voters’ fingers to prevent revoting, as is done in many other countries. There’s no way to hack that.




a leftie sees the light

Good article by a former leftie.

Headline:

How I stopped hating guns — and embraced self-reliance

See, I’m a former leftist. I drank the Kool-Aid of progressivism (and served a lot of it too) from the time I was a teenager. There wasn’t a welfare program I didn’t want expanded nor an “oppressed minority” I didn’t think needed special support from the state. My views were the typical politics of resentment. Like millions of other leftists, my orientation to the world was simple: “The government should take care of that for me."

Of course I wanted gun control. Everyone knows that guns kill people, right? It sounds stupid to me now, but as someone who spent his life exclusively around other leftists until the age of 41, I believed a lot of very stupid things for a very long time.

Most leftists won’t even listen to a conservative point of view. Or more accurately, perhaps, they can't. Confrontation with anything they perceive as “right-wing” provokes an almost involuntary emotional reaction, a kind of contamination-disgust reflex. I know it well because I often reacted the same way.

Until I didn't. A crisis that unmasked the mental and moral illness in my family was the first event that started to open my eyes to the real world. What I’d been taught at home — men are inherently dangerous and toxic, the government should regulate and tax everything so that single mothers can get bigger benefits checks — had disturbed my moral compass until middle age.

And then came COVID. I had already begun to let go of my leftist beliefs and turn to the right, but nothing pushed me farther or faster than watching the government trample the constitutional rights of citizens. It was unbelievable how many people obeyed extra-legal orders to stay home, wear masks, take jabs, and tell on their families and neighbors who didn’t obey Big Sister (it’s definitely “sister” in the 21st century).

The extraordinary nationalization of rental properties by the Centers for Disease Control infuriated me. As a landlord, I could not believe that some “health”-based federal agency thought it had the right to tell my tenants they could just stop paying rent and that I had to suck it up. I count this turn of events as a blessing, as it cured me of the remnants of my allegiance to, well, communist views. Because that’s what leftism is today.

Back to guns. I can’t explain why I believed what I did. Over the years, more sensible people patiently explained to me that criminals don’t obey gun control laws. They pointed out that when you have bad guys with guns that good guys can’t get, you end up with bad guys in charge and good guys in coffins. This is so glaringly obvious that a 4-year-old could understand it, and yet I didn’t. Never underestimate the average leftist's capacity for self-delusion.

Actually, I can explain why I believed what I did and why millions of leftists believe the same. No actual thinking is taking place, only feeling. I had emotions about guns, but no thoughts. To be a leftist is to be ruled by fear, disgust, and the projection of one’s own negative motivations onto other people.

I can’t live that way any more. Not after the real world slapped me in the face — and slapped some sense into me. Being a small business owner educated me about the plain thievery of our taxation system. Being excommunicated from my job, my friends, and my social circle over my refusal to take a dangerous vaccine — and worse, my persistence in talking about it loudly and publicly — taught me the difference between friends and “friends.”



the AI girlfriend: don't do it

I remember both of those episodes and how cringey they were.



the mind of Audrey Hale, Covenant killer

I can see why the authorities, who have all gone woke, were at pains not to reveal the writings of Audrey Hale, the biological female and trans male who shot up the Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee. They say they were afraid of "false narratives," but what they really feared was that, if Hale's writings were revealed, they would confirm what people already suspected about her. The stereotypical mass shooter, these days, is somewhere on the autism spectrum and very likely to be trans. (Remember the un-PC Hollywood trope—still prevalent today in some films—of the murderous homosexual? Think: "No Way Out," "The Jackal," or "This Is the End" among other films. Outside-of-the-norm sexuality has long been associated with fatally violent tendencies.) Hale's writings also bring up a Freudian concept long considered debunked: penis envy. I can imagine a bunch of psychologists rushing to Hale's defense and saying that whatever she was experiencing wasn't true penis envy, but they'd have to twist themselves into pretzels to make that case, which is basically a No True Scotsman fallacy. Here's a definition of the relevant concept:

Penis envy is a theory from early psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud. He believed that when female children realize they lack a penis, they feel “castrated” in comparison to males. Freud believed this was a pivotal moment in female sexual development and a source of mental illness.

Since coining the term “penis envy” in 1908, psychologists have questioned and criticized it. Freud based the idea on his own beliefs about sex and gender rather than on data. To date, no research has ever proven that penis envy exists.

Many also argue that the theory is sexist, as it assumes that being male is inherently more desirable than being female. Despite this criticism, penis envy was a popular concept in Freudian psychoanalysis during the 20th century.

Now that Hale's writings have more fully come to light (with some released last year and some this year), see what she wrote in a piece titled "My Imaginary Penis":

The remainder of the four pages, however, revolves around the shooter’s fixation on being a man, and suggests a serious case of gender dysphoria. She fantasized about what it would be like to have a penis.

“I want to know what that’s like, but I never will because I was damned to be born this way,” she wrote in the journal. “I swear to fuck I hate it so goddamned much. It’s a fucking curse.”

[ ... ]

Elsewhere in the journal entry she describes at length graphic sexual games she would play with her stuffed animals, fantasizing that she was the boy performing sex acts on a girl doll. The margins of her journal entries are filled with immature sexual drawings.

“I can pretend to be them and do the things boys do and experience my boy self as Tony — my stuffed boy doll is like the boy I am in another form since childhood,” she writes in the journal. “I constructed him a penis, then got out my girl doll named Ashley (who is Tony’s life-long boyfriend) to have sex w/ Tony. Ashley was represented as my dream girl I wished to have in real life.”

Sounds a lot like classic penis envy. I'm not saying that Audrey Hale's journal is enough evidence to bring penis envy back into currency, but her writing sure does give one pause.

Hale hated her parents (whom she reportedly wanted to kill) and their conservative religious attitudes. She blames her folks for refusing to allow her puberty blockers and other measures to become the male she felt herself to be. It goes without saying that plenty of kids before her have rebelled against religion; few of those rebels went on to become mass murderers. But it's turning out that more and more mass shooters are indeed "on the spectrum," as they say. What the woke authorities fear is that this problem is more than a mere stereotype created by bigots; quite the opposite, facing this reality could be key to preventing more such shootings.

None of this is to say that being outside of the sexual norm should automatically brand one as a potential mass killer. The same is true of being on the autism spectrum. But as data for this correlation continue to mount, it's important explore the implications. Correlation isn't causation, but it's not nothing, either. Don't close off discussion by screaming, "Bigot!"



shots fired

I've written, in recent weeks, about my intestinal misadventures.

Here's Michael Gilleland, quoting the ancients. Jerome, evoking Tertullian:

But even if our food be the commonest, we must avoid repletion. For nothing is so destructive to the mind as a full belly, seething and turning itself hither and thither and transforming its gases into belches and farts.



more clay nonsense





Monday, June 17, 2024

"hate white, date white"

Amala goes over the phenomenon of "people of color" trashing white people as toxic and dangerous while at the same time dating and even marrying those same white folks. The left is often deaf to its own hypocrisy.



it nearly killed me

So my tentative conclusion is that I'm super-sensitive to carbs. Whatever cheating I do needs to be, at most, once a month, and it has to be a cheat meal, not a cheat day. I took in a lot of carbs starting from Friday and going through Sunday. My boeuf bourguignon would've been fine without the pasta, but I ate gobs of fusilli. Over the weekend, I also finished off my nachos leftovers, which meant taking down a ton of corn chips (that weren't half bad for once, except for their round shape, which is terrible for nachos), and I didn't help matters by guzzling regular sodas and eating those high-grade Hershey's chocolate-covered pomegranates and blueberries. God, I love those. But I'm at the point, I guess, where everything I love is poised to kill me, so I have to say goodbye to it all. Hasta la huego, mis nachos.



good question

Headline:

Who Are Biden Voters Saving The Planet For If None Of Them Are Having Children?
Just roughly 1 in 5 Biden supporters believe society would be better off by prioritizing marriage and children, according to Pew.

A new report from the Pew Research Center released last week found that less than 20 percent of President Joe Biden’s supporters believe society would be better off prioritizing marriage and children. These are also the voters most likely to believe “climate change” represents an immediate existential threat to the future of the species, which raises the question, who are Biden voters saving the planet for if merely a fraction of them even want children?

Yet another one of those self-undermining leftist self-contradictions, like Race is merely an abstract concept, but it's possible to be racist or Sex and gender are not binaries, but bisexuality is still a thing (LGBTQ). Read the rest.



more shitholification

It's good this is all being documented by people like Decoy Voice, but it's sad to watch the rot happening with no hope of change in sight. The regular people in places like San Francisco don't want to change: they'll keep behaving the way they do and voting for politicians and policies that ensure this all continues. And the rich, the powerful, the connected are as happy as pigs in shit about the problem. Wait—what problem? There's no problem!






the Dr. Phil-Donald Trump interview

Here's the full interview from a week ago:

Detractors are calling this a "softball" interview, with George Stephanopoulos going so far as to declare that giving Trump an open forum through a live interview amounts to "journalistic malpractice." Here's Liberal Hivemind with a different take on the matter:





"The Phantom Menace": a 25-year retrospective

It took a while, I remember, to come down from the afterglow of seeing the movie in 1999. We'd all been starved for more Star Wars stories, and it hadn't sunk in just how bad "The Phantom Menace" was. But much later, the sequel trilogy showed us that it could all be so, so much worse. Jeremy Jahns offers his thoughts on a dubious legacy.

And on that note:

I heard "The Acolyte" TV series just tanked and got cancelled. Haw haw, Disney.



oh, I see

"House of the Dragon," Season 2 is out, but on HBO Max.* I guess it'll be some time before it makes its way over to Apple TV, so I won't be watching it quite yet.

__________

*Because I'm a child of the 70s and 80s, I always see "HBO Max" and think Cinemax.



chest pain + needing to shit = dilemma

Tonight (Sunday night/Monday morning), I had my first severe chest pain while at the office. I'm sure this is related to having gone off the chain this past Friday (our luncheon) and weekend (as I polished off leftovers). Carbs, I now realize, can literally kill me if I'm not careful, so since I have less than a month to repair my numbers before my next hospital visit, this coming week is going to be extra-stringent. But what I really want to talk about is what happened tonight.

I was working at the second-floor office, trying to catch up (or not get behind) on the latest project, when it suddenly became hard to breathe, and a familiar—but stronger than usual—crushing sensation arose in my chest. I began to wonder whether this was the beginning of a bona fide heart attack, and as I mentally cast about for solutions, I realized that my nitroglycerin tablets were back at the apartment—totally useless to me.

At the same that I was experiencing chest pains, my colon had roused itself and begun to sing the opening measures of an opera that I knew would eventually become unstoppable unless I did something. As I've done when any sort of disaster has struck me while walking across Korea, I thought to myself, One problem at a time, and decided to see whether I could make it down the hallway to the restroom. I made it, but at a very slow, breathless pace. Once in the restroom, I moved down to the lone Western-style toilet, opened the cubicle door... and saw the whole thing had been smeared in shit (all this has happened before and will happen again). I don't know why the kids who attend class in this building insist on doing something so fucked up, but there it was—third-world behavior from first-world children who didn't give a rat's ass about other people who might need the toilet. I want to take these kids, put their heads on a flat table of stone, and do a Gallagher on them, sledgehammering their skulls like ripe watermelons for being so inconsiderate. At the very least, I'd force them at gunpoint to clean the toilet with their tongue. Then I'd Gallagher them.

Because it was close to 11:40 p.m., I knew the first-floor toilet was walled off by a descending metal screen that the guards always lower at 9 p.m. That meant I had to go up to the third-floor restroom. Breathless and chest-pained as I was, I paused, then slowly made the climb to the third floor, each flight of the climb feeling like an eternity. I shambled into the restroom, holding back the urge to faint, opened the door to the Western-style cubicle... and beheld with dismay that this cubicle, too, looked as if it had suffered a mortar attack from an army using shit as its primary weapon. It literally looked like an explosion: coprological speckles were everywhere—in the toilet bowl and all over the cubicle walls. What the fuck do Korean students eat to produce such lusty detonations?

Time to reprioritize. I had run out of toilets, I still needed to shit, and I was still wondering whether this was my first-ever heart attack. One thing at a time. The new priority was to get home so I could shit and self-medicate. I went back to the second floor, rested on a seat next to Woori Bank (which is also on our floor), then somehow managed to shuffle back down to my office. Once inside, I concentrated on just resting, ignoring the pounding demon inside my colon, raging to get out. I knew I didn't have it in me to use the subway (too many stairs both down and up), so my only option was to go out to the main street and flag down a cab. So I closed up shop inside the office, having brought my work to a clear stopping point. I turned off the air filter and A/C, washed my dishes (I'd eaten dinner at the office), switched off the office and kitchenette lights, and locked our company's main door. I painfully descended the steps to the first floor and followed the only available path for exiting the building. 

Once out, I somehow crossed the long parking lot and got to the main street without fainting. I was then lucky enough to flag down a cab that came my way within a minute of my arriving at the curb. I told the cabbie to take me to Daecheong Tower, and off we went. I thought only about nitroglycerin along the way. The urge to shit wasn't as bad as I'd feared, and I made it to my apartment building without exploding inside the car. The cabbie himself was sullen and quiet for the entire ride; when I told him to please turn left at the Daecheong Station intersection to drop me right in front of my building, he said nothing in response. He only became talkative right as I was leaving; I thanked him and wished him a good day, and he offered a grunt in response. (I've noticed, on these evening rides, that the cabbies now increase their fares before midnight; at a guess, they up their rates at 11 p.m.)

I shuffled toward my building, briefly considering stopping at the public restroom in the building's lobby, but I mentally said fuck that and went to the elevator, hitting the button for the 14th floor and enduring the ride up. It was nighttime and quiet, just after midnight. I quietly gasped my way down the long hallway to my apartment, stepped inside, did my usual just-got-home ritual of emptying my pockets and washing my hands, then moved over to the bathroom and gave vent to the fury within. It turned out to be a pretty standard, boilerplate shit, which may be why I didn't feel the usual pre-evacuation desperation. One thing I grabbed before I sat on the throne was my little bottle of nitroglycerin tablets. I managed to get the bottle out of the Ziploc bag with one hand and unscrew the cap with one hand; I then managed to coax a single pill out, and I gratefully stuck it under my tongue and let it melt there. There didn't seem to be any effect for the first thirty seconds, but after a couple minutes, I noticed my thoughts had become much happier, my breathing had gotten smoother, and the whole world seemed to be on a more even keel. And no more chest pain. Those pills work.

All in all, that whole disaster felt like a close one, in more ways than one. Of all the outcomes I'd like to avoid, I don't want people to find my corpse with underwear around the ankles and signs that I'd been whacking off to porn. And I also don't want people to find me on the toilet like poor Elvis, fat and dead, with a load of shit in the toilet bowl and a look of simultaneous triumph and tragedy on my face. Tonight, the porn thing wouldn't have happened, but I have to wonder how close I'd come to the second scenario. After I cleaned up from my zesty session, I did a load of laundry and decided tonight might be a good night for nocturnal self-medication, just as a way to make sure my blood vessels have beneficent chemicals washing through them so I'm assured of waking up in the morning.

This incident makes me realize that that one YouTuber may have had the right idea about dieting: do just a cheat meal, not a cheat day. And in my case—commit my dietary sins on only one calendar day instead of spreading the misbehavior over three days just because there are leftovers that need to be eaten. Either throw the leftovers away from now on (and get better at cooking the correct amount to serve a group of people and have no leftovers) or give the leftovers away on the day of. Something has to improve. 

And maybe think about going hardcore carnivore so as to avoid carbs almost completely.



Sunday, June 16, 2024

interview with a New Yorker about protestors





another dose of Chris Chappell

China, their shitty EVs, and the EU market:

A Chinese spy's testimony:

Those Boeing whistleblowers:





Styx in your craw

Don't watch all of the vids—just the ones that pique your interest.

What would we see in a second Trump term? (wishful thinking: engaged)

Running-mate speculation:

Less wokeness at MIT? (Don't bet on it.)

"IRS political targeting":

More wild-eyed talk of the next pandemic:

US troops to leave Niger (not covered by the mainstream):

Biden projects himself onto Trump:

On the purported Dem strategy of "the Great Replacement":

Israel's invasion of Rafah (personally, I'm all for it):

UNC Chapel Hill also anti-woke? (yeah, right)

Flaccid policies try and fail to echo Trump's:

Protest voters against Joe Biden:

Russia and black gold:

Trump-Biden debate: Pelosi has her doubts:

Recent stock-market news:

Switching to a popular-vote model is a bad, bad idea:

On whether Biden should take a pre-debate drug test (he won't):

Kids on the Net:

Are presidential debates significant?

Styx doesn't think Biden will be ditched as nominee (I don't, either):

Old news, but Klaus Schwab is outta here!

Mar-a-Lago and "lethal force":

From June 7:





an irony we've mentioned before

When the law you stupidly advocated for comes back to bite you in the dick:





boeuf bourguignon

From Friday's luncheon:

unstirred

stirred

The luncheon was mostly a success, but my Korean coworker decided to shake some Parmesan cheese onto his bowl of beef Burgundy. I gave him the usual grimace that I always give him when he does weird, fucked-up things with Western food. He's put ketchup on bologna-and-cheese sandwiches before, then microwaved the sandwich (because he fucking microwaves everything). The boss and I joshed about the cheese thing maybe a little too much, and my coworker gave an awkward Korean laugh (instead of frowning or wincing, Koreans laugh in moments of awkwardness) and called himself a 푸드 테로리스트/pudeu-teroriseuteu, a "food terrorist." When he'd left the room, the boss was more sympathetic than I was, saying my coworker was merely experimenting, and without experimentation, how can one innovate? I privately thought that my boss was perhaps deliberately missing the point, but whatever—the deed was done. I told the boss that I wondered what it'd be like to take my coworker to France to let my French family see him putting cheese on food that shouldn't have it.*

The question of being a purist about something** always takes me in a metaphysical direction: from a Buddhist perspective, everything ends up being connected to everything else—everything implies or flows into everything else, so it's impossible to find anything one can call a foundation or an essence. There's nothing essential about French cuisine. It's not impossible to put cheese on beef Burgundy. But it's also true that beef Burgundy is a known quantity, and plenty of French folks will look askance at the foreigner who presumes to ruin the dish with fake Italian cheese (I did say he used Parmesan, not Parmigiano). There's creativity, and there's getting it wrong. If I point at a baby and call it an octopus, that's plain wrong, not an example of creativity. If I point at a monkey baby and call it a human baby, I might be closer than with the octopus thing, but I'd still be dead wrong.

From the Buddhist perspective, this is what it means to be a thing: real, but never fundamentally real. What is French cuisine if not the result of centuries of culinary interactions with roots and influences extending far beyond the boundaries of ancient Gaul? French cuisine—the coalescence of phenomena that we see today—therefore has no solid essence but is instead the product of interdependent interactions—causes and effects that are themselves causes for more effects, all ramifying and echoing and mixing and separating and colliding and flying past each other. But at the same time, can we not say that there is a such thing as distinctly French cuisine? This push-pull relationship between the static and the dynamic is the reality we live in, and as mere humans, we all have our tendencies and our preferences. When it comes to food, my tendency generally is to be conservative, but I innovate once in a while, too. My Korean coworker is often a nightmare when it comes to how he reckons with Western food (see above), but he's also made sincere efforts at doing certain foods the proper way: I've eaten his homemade scones and his early attempts at bagels (I really respect him for trying to make legit bagels; even I haven't done that yet), and they all came out tasting like the real thing. In fact, I like my coworker's bagels better than those Costco bagels, which are in turn a damn sight better than those ridiculous Paris Baguette bagels (which are an abomination).

Philosophical ruminations aside, the luncheon went about as well as it could. The boss liked his boeuf bourguignon and didn't add any goddamn cheese. My coworker lamely tried to justify his use of cheese by noting that the beef was on a bed of pasta. He really doesn't understand flavor profiles—the question of what goes with what in a given culinary culture, as well as what makes a given culinary culture distinct. He should go through the same culinary education I've gone through: a heavy dose of Food Network, including all the ridiculous shows like "Chopped" and "Iron Chef," followed by the assiduous following of certain chefs on YouTube. And along the way: practice, practice, practice. I should put him in touch with Charles*** since he likes baking so much.

__________

*To be fair, Italians note that, when Americans attempt Italian food, they think garlic needs to go in everything (like carbonara), but it doesn't. This is a stereotype.

**In this context, the something is food, but we could be talking about language or culture or anything else, really.

***Charles, dude, you need to switch your site to https for security's sake.