This is a hoot. What's wrong with this picture?
Journalism continues to beclown itself.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
a different sort of fake news
Journalism continues to beclown itself.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Journalism continues to beclown itself.
Journalism continues to beclown itself.
KEVIN'S WALK BLOGS
BIG HOMINID'S TEES
WHAT CORN AND PEANUTS ARE HIDDEN IN THE WARM AND STEAMING PILE?
Vapid cultural commentary, pungent reviews, sundry Korea-related musings, fartological/scatological humor, political flatulence, and nondualistic Zen excretions in prose or poetry form.
Got a beef? Write the Hominid at bighominid [at] gmail [dot] com, and put "HAIRY CHASMS" in the subject line, or your mail will be automatically trashed by Satan, my beautiful but deadly spam filter. Assume your mail will be published (editing at my discretion), unless you specify otherwise. Welcome to my backside.
BLOGROLLING POLICY: I don't do mutual linkage, and I have no problem with asymmetrical linkage: I link to bloggers who don't link back, and that's fine by me. Please DO NOT ask to be linked. Please DO NOT expect linkage just because you've linked to me. Also, if I don't link to you, please do not assume I think your blog sucks.
COMMENTS POLICY: My blog is my house; I'm responsible for keeping my dwelling clean. Commenters are guests, and guests of this blog will be civil, succinct, and relevant. All comments are subject to approval; I reserve the right to publish or not publish—in a pristine or altered form—all comments (and emails intended as comments) that I receive. Act like an asshole on my turf, and I'll make you look like the asshole you are. Be cool, and we won't have a problem. Simple, yes? And before I forget:
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. Take responsibility for what you say. Screen names are OK, but no sock puppetry. Use the same SN consistently.
Click Dalma Daesa and see where he leads you.
"Fire scroton torpedoes!!"
(image courtesy of Rory)
Comments CURRENTLY ALLOWED.
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS!
Big Hominid Watches Over You
Click Dalma Daesa and see where he leads you.
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS!
HIRSUTE COMRADES
BLOG ARCHIVE
-
▼
2018
(1084)
-
▼
February
(68)
- why Wyoming?
- wow—my guest room is much better than my regular a...
- drip, drip, drip redux
- power outage
- the cognitive mesh
- "Darkest Hour": review
- "The Disaster Artist": review
- l'exode des Juifs français continue
- "Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri": review
- drip, drip, drip
- KMA leaves me in the lurch
- Korea hates a free market
- ululate (belatedly)!
- a glimpse of evil
- the gods are against me
- interesting exchange
- "The more they overthink the plumbing..."
- how not to argue your case
- airheads
- Lord, may this never be me
- opening soon: my local branch of the Church of Seitan
- seen on Gab
- the muddled world of Michael Keaton
- "The Florida Project": review
- trans thoughts: redux
- "Hunt for the Wilderpeople" and "The Station Agent...
- blacksmith nerdery
- Happy New Year!
- "Lady Bird": one-paragraph review
- "What We Do in the Shadows": brief review
- "Black Panther": review
- pretty much Venezuela in a nutshell
- Harpy Ballantine's Deigh!
- a different sort of fake news
- on being "trans"
- The Princess Diarist: review
- Peterson vs. Newman in a nutshell
- Amurrica's own Baghdad Bob
- a busy week coming up
- Vine compilation
- a tip o' the hat
- this cracked me up
- today-sah raahnchie
- your dose of Jordan Peterson
- Ave, ROK Drop!
- whiteout
- "Batman of Shanghai": a different take
- "Make a ragù," he said
- Schadenfreude as reporters try Trump's cognitive test
- parading around
- this video is the Platonic ideal form of "half-jok...
- another blow against meditation/mindfulness
- Andrew Klavan on the ongoing FISA scandal
- "Homefront": review
- cue bitter, cynical laughter
- Ave, Charles!
- and now, we plan again
- Amtrak sucks
- garbage plate: the variant
- idiots are everywhere
- epic rant by Stefan Molyneux re: the FISA memo's r...
- eaters of the garbage plate
- et voilà: zee garbage plate
- the road to hell
- "one of the best things we've ever done"
- progress report
- tonight, the garbage-ing begins
- SOTU reactions in my ambit
-
▼
February
(68)
5 comments:
Is this real? This can't be real.
The last time I went to a P.F. Chang's was when I was visiting a friend out in California. That had to be at least ten years ago. Maybe more.
You could be right: this could be a Photoshopped image designed to catch rightie suckers (I saw this on rightie-heavy Gab.ai). Stay tuned: we might soon find out this was a prank/troll.
For what it's worth, the news story was quoted by Drudge, so if this is a prank, then Drudge is a huge sucker. The news story itself is from the Chicago Tribune, which says:
Pyeongchang is a mountainous county 110 miles southeast of Seoul in South Korea, and the host of the 2018 Winter Olympics.
P.F. Chang’s is an Asian-inspired chain restaurant with 210 U.S. locations, including ones in Chicago, Lombard, Northbrook, Orland Park and Schaumburg.
PyeongChang and P.F. Chang’s are not the same thing, and beyond the fact that they both begin with the letter P and end in “Chang,” they have little in common.
This distinction, however, appears to have eluded WLS-Ch.7’s news team, which on Saturday morning accidentally broadcast a report about the political backdrop to the Winter Olympics, illustrated with the graphic, “P.F. Chang 2018.”
Jayme Nicholas, a spokesperson for the ABC affiliate in Chicago, told Inc. that the goof was the result of a mix-up. The graphic was created for a different “satirical piece” put together on Friday by sports anchor Mark Giangreco in which viewers were encouraged to invent their own Olympic sports, but it was mistakenly also used for the serious news story read on Saturday by weekend anchor Mark Rivera, Nicholas said.
Nicholas apologized for the gaffe, which is the kind of screw-up that makes all of us in the news business touch wood and utter the phrase, “There but for the grace of God go I.”
Also: is it my imagination, or are there only four Olympic rings in that logo?
This makes sense: "The graphic was created for a different “satirical piece” put together on Friday by sports anchor Mark Giangreco in which viewers were encouraged to invent their own Olympic sports, but it was mistakenly also used for the serious news story read on Saturday by weekend anchor Mark Rivera, Nicholas said."
That would also explain the four rings versus five. Chalk it up to carelessness and searching around for a graphic--any graphic--when putting together a piece.
re: four rings
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing.
Post a Comment