Saturday, January 09, 2021

Navient finally recognizes my triumph

Here's a snapshot of the congratulatory email I received from Navient, the company that has managed my scholastic debt ever since it took over for Sallie Mae (those are supposed to be animated fireworks, by the way):

I clicked on "Tell us your success story" and took a lengthy survey that asked a lot of questions about how I got through my debt repayment.  At several points, I was asked to write at length about my insights; one field asked me to offer suggestions to other people currently paying down their debts, and I was happy to offer a long list of dos and don'ts.  In related news, the credit agency that has been monitoring my credit score also reported that my credit rating has gone up since it received word that I had zeroed out my scholastic debt.  Once my credit card gets paid off in the next couple of months, my credit rating ought to be stellar.

Am still looking to treat myself to a decadent buffet.  Victory is sweet.



Styx, en fuego

Here are all three of Styx's videos for the day. All are worth your while.






Friday, January 08, 2021

wanna impeach Trump? get ready to reap the whirlwind, then

I'm looking forward to a bunch of dumb cunts actually trying this.  Nearly 75 million people are pissed off right how, and a contingent has already proven ready and willing to storm the Capitol.   Go ahead—impeach Trump and see what happens.  I have no sympathy for any lefties who get ground up when that machine revs to life.  No amount of police or military protection will stop that wave.  Impeach him.  Please.



thank you, readership

Sometime around the end of last year, this blog—according to its site-traffic meter—passed the three-million visits* mark.  Last month, probably because of the holidays, readership was low, and I didn't even make 20,000 visits for the month.  To reach 20K visits, I need to average about 700 visits per day, and so far, in January, I'm well on my way to doing that:  every day thus far has been over 700.  In terms of the big picture, this still puts me at the shallow end of the pool; I'm not receiving tens of thousands of visits per hour the way the big blogs do.  But that's fine:  I've chosen to blog the way I do, and people can take it or leave it.  This isn't about whoring myself for the sake of fame.  I'm happy to get the visits I do, but I'm also happy to be no more than a minor demon in the hellscape that is bloggerdom.  My thanks to all the readers—lurkers and commenters—who helped push me over the three-million mark.

__________

*NB:  Blogger's site-traffic meter doesn't distinguish between "page views" and "unique visits."  A unique visit is when you visit my blog and hang around there for a while.  If you "flip" through various pages of the blog by clicking on and reading different blog entries, then those are the page views that happen during a single unique visit.  The page-view stat is therefore much larger than the unique-visit stat.  If Blogger is counting page views, then my three-million stat is obviously inflated.  If it's counting unique visits, then the stat is more trustworthy.  A good explanation of hits, impressions, visits, page views, etc., is here.  And from this site, we learn the following about Blogger stats:

...the Blogger stats system counts visits from robots and search crawlers. You see, search engines like Yahoo, Google and Bing go out and crawl the web for pages and content multiple times each day. Every time they crawl your site, it is counted as a pageview in your Blogger stats. Those are not real people and are not really pageviews. I know, your Blogger stats are so much better! But they are not your true stats. Additionally, the Blogger system counts spam bots, while Google Analytics has the capabilities to identify these bots and to not count them as pageviews.

This discrepancy is good to know when you are buying advertising spots on other sites. If they claim a certain number of pageviews, shoot them an email and ask if that is from their Google Analytics or their Blogger stats. I have seen numbers differ by as much as 50%. So if a site is claiming 30,000 pageviews per month, it could actually be 15,000. That is important information to know when you are spending money on advertising.

So in all likelihood, my stats are inflated.



seen on Instapundit

Double standards.  It's OK when we do it; it's evil when they do it.

ADDENDUM:  I don't normally link to Sarah Hoyt, but this article—typos, awkward English, and all—is not bad.



deepest thing I've read all day

From Dr. V.:

If a property is defined as an instantiable entity, then existence cannot be understood as a property of existing particulars. This is because the particular must already exist to be in a position to instantiate any properties including the putative property of existence.

This is a great explanation of the claim "existence is not a predicate."  In John Hick's Philosophy of Religion, it's explained this way (I'm citing this from memory, so this isn't an exact quote):  if we say "a cow exists," we're not saying "a cow has existence," as if existence were a predicate (property):  what we're really saying is "there's an X such that 'X is a cow' is true."  Hick's explanation dovetails perfectly with what Dr. V wrote above.

In slightly simpler language: in order for some X to have (possess) something, X already has to exist.  It therefore makes no sense to say "X has existence" because you're trapping yourself in an infinite loop (or "vicious circle"):  X has to exist before it can be said to have existence.  The very property X is supposed to have must be in place before X can be said to have it.



I cancel myself

Sad news:  the recent snow, combined with below-freezing temperatures, has forced me to cancel my 30K hike that had been planned for this weekend.  Were there no snow on the ground, I'd have no problem trekking in the cold, but now, with the chance of slippage, I'm not willing to risk injury.  Technically, the sidewalks near my office are walkable, but only barely.  Even light, fleet-footed Koreans are treading with care.  The sun will eventually melt the snow off the exposed parts of all the walkways, but that's going to take a while.  

The hike will have to wait.



Thursday, January 07, 2021

Styx on the Capitol-related hypocrisy

"They make money off BLM shirts made in China."

America Uncovered also has good commentary:





quick reminder to commenters

I don't like deleting comments that are otherwise harmless and well intended, but as my comments policy states (the policy sits right over the comment window—READ IT, for God's sakes), I don't publish anonymous comments.  If you can't log in with a proper screen name, at least sign your name or nickname within the comment itself.  Two comments appeared in my moderation queue just a moment ago, but with no name attached, so I deleted them.  Please respect my comments policy, which even shouts out in all caps, "READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!"—and all will be well.

The reason I insist upon signed comments is that I think people should take responsibility for what they say.  I also abhor the cowardly act of sock puppetry, so even if you sign your comment with a pseudonym, I expect you to show consistency by always using the same pseudonym whenever you visit the blog.

Of course, some people simply have a brain fart and forget to append their names to their comments.  In such cases, it's not that they're trying to dodge responsibility for what they say; it's an honest mistake.  I get that.  But the policy is what it is, and I try not to enforce it inconsistently unless I'm absolutely sure, given the comment's prose style, that I know who the commenter is.  Dig around this blog long enough, and you'll see a few anonymous comments that made it through, but as I said, that's because I knew who was commenting.  Try not to make a habit of forgetting your name when commenting, please.



why not use the Eagles to fly the Ring to Mordor?

The YouTube channel Film Theory (which is run by "MatPat," who also runs a few other "Theory" channels, e.g., Food Theory, Game Theory, etc.) has a video about one of the biggest "plot hole" questions from The Lord of the Rings:  why not just use the Eagles to fly the Ring of Power to Mordor to be destroyed?  Wouldn't that have saved everyone a great deal of unnecessary time, effort, and death?  MatPat dismantles this notion, claiming that it would almost be worse than just giving the Ring directly to Sauron:

I like MatPat's various Theory channels, but the lack of a vocative comma in "Fly, you fools!" is driving me fucking nuts.



a Capitol affair: glimpses from the commentariat

It's not exactly right to say "the Capitol is burning," but the US Capitol has indeed been breached, if you will, seemingly by self-proclaimed Trump supporters.  President Trump had encouraged his supporters to gather in Washington, DC, on January 6, the day the electoral votes were to be counted and certified, thereby officially affirming that Joe Biden is now president of the United States.  Were the people entering the Capitol part of the larger crowd of protestors who were there to decry election malfeasance?  That's unclear.  What is clear is that Vice President Mike Pence and others were quickly whisked away to a safe location when the siege of the Capitol began.  At least one person—an unarmed female Air Force veteran—has been shot dead, presumably by security forces inside the Capitol.  Tim Pool reported that several police officers had been injured in the violence.  President Trump himself came out and told the protestors to "go home in peace."  This seems to indicate that he recognizes the struggle is over, and he'll have no choice but to concede to Biden.

In terms of the bigger picture, commentary is all over the place.  Unsurprisingly, people on the left are accusing Trump of having incited the violence by encouraging people to assemble on Capitol Hill.  People on the right, while not praising the violence, are darkly noting that the left has gotten away with rioting for at least a year ("mostly peaceful protests," as the media called the destructive and occasionally deadly riots), and after four years of provoking the right, what did the left expect?  Here is a "core sample" of commentary lifted from Instapundit.

Two groups of people (call them A and B) both see themselves as victims and have grievances they feel aren’t being heard. Both resort to violence.
 
Dem reactions to group A:
“People will do what they do”
“Tell me where it says protests have to be peaceful”
“Don’t judge a whole group by the actions of a few”
“America is racist”
 
Dem reactions to group B:
“They are traitors”
“Violence is never acceptable”
“Arrest any people who agree with them in Congress”
 
This doesn’t go unnoticed.
 
__________
 
I think the country is close to a 'sans culottes' moment.
Gunning down an unarmed woman with what was apparently an attempt for a head shot, by the same people who stood back and watched when churches and buildings were being burned by BLM and Antifa, could be the spark that starts the conflagration.

__________
 
How much actual violence was there today? Other [than] the cop shooting a lady... nothing was burned. Most of the folks in the capital were already identified as Antifa seen in pictures at other protests... I mean if they are trying to make this as equal to riots it's sad.

__________

Time to start a new party, people. You all need to leave the GOP NOW. Fk 'em. Let's see how they run their Dem Lite Party without any actual members to fund them. I'm registered independent, have been since I turned eighteen and first registered to vote, but I'd give up that independence to join a MAGA or Patriot party. Tell me, is there any way to persuade Trump to found and lead it or is this something we're gonna have to do without him? And are there any other Republicans who might join us? I mean, of the ones in office who have shown some integrity and courage during this massive fraud.

__________

Please list the Democrats who condemned the sending of a mob to Josh Hawley's house yesterday.
Please list the Democrats who condemned the terroristic left-wing threats that dissuaded prominent law firms from representing Trump in the election recounts.
Please list the Democrats who condemned the successful efforts to keep the Pennsylvania legislature from examining the election results, due to the terroristic threats against the legislators and their families.
Please list the Democrats...

__________
 
A lot of double and nonexistent standards here.
 
Today's actions do not even come close to the property damage and loss of life associated with the typical "mostly peaceful protest" we saw last year. Joe Biden has consistently failed to condemn violence by his own supporters and specifically refused to condemn Antifa. His running mate said the "protests" "should and must continue." I would also like for someone to explain how if the use of lethal force was "justified" today, how it could be said to have been unjustified in any of the cases which led to "mostly peaceful protests" last year.
 
Particularly silly is the argument that today's events justify suppressing a full and fair investigation of this year's election irregularities. If that is the standard, there wouldn't have been any investigations of questionable police shootings last year because each and every one of them was followed by more serious violence than we saw today.
 
__________
 
Get back to me after Biden "forcefully condemns" Antifa.
 
Significant sections of several American cities burned this summer, without a word of criticism from Democratic elected officials.
 
__________

F you both. We're not having two sets of standards, one for Republicans and another for Democrats, one for whites and one for nonwhites, as we slowly slide into the muck of third-world corruption and mediocrity with a [complicit] government.

That was nothing, nothing compared to what the people in that rotunda deserved today.

__________

Look's like everyone in "right-wing media" is just terrified that the police state is going to come for them next.
 
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
—Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
 
__________

Every last Republican in Iowa is condemning the "violence." Which is no more than a few broken windows. You know what? This is the hill I choose to die on. Not a single vote for any of these fakes, ever again. 

__________

Please. Stop this childish whining.
 
The left has shown that they will not ever condemn political violence. It is a tool of the left, and they have been using it skillfully for over 120 years.
 
The number of supposedly intelligent people who are so stupid as to say "both the left and right must condemn violence" is legion. Here's the bottom line: You're gullible morons. The left will never condemn their own violence, because it is their stock in trade for effecting change when their will is denied at the ballot box or in court. So in effect, supposed 'conservatives' who make these appeals for "both sides must condemn violence' are a) stupid, b) gullible, and c) are now seen by the public as espousing unilateral disarmament.
 
The left will never reform their ways. It is who they are. The right is learning from Alinsky's playbook, and playing it better. That's what these supposed "intellectuals" are now complaining about.

__________

The GOP, with a few exceptions, is happy to see Trump go. They can return to being the party of "free" trade with the slave-labor-Chinese-fascist dictatorship...amnesty and an open border to welfare-subsidized cheap labor for jobs [that] can't be sent out of country to please their donor class[,] which doesn't want to pay American workers American money for American work.

They wish to go back to being the controlled-opposition, volunteer-loser faction of the Uniparty.

__________ 
 
Kevin's note:  video of what people have been calling the "storming" of the Capitol can be found here.  It could be that the characterization "storming" is just more wild-eyed reporting from the mainstream media.  From what I saw, demonstrators were walking around placidly.  Other video apparently shows the police opening barricades and allowing protestors onto Capitol grounds.  I suspect that, over the coming weeks, we'll discover the truth is not what's currently being reported.  Tim Pool, however, did say there was tear gas in the Capitol Rotunda.  I'm curious to know more about the what, the how, and the why before I make judgments.

 

MY THOUGHTS

In the end, Trump will leave office.  The left keeps trying to paint him as an inciter of violence, but it can never point to a specific instance in which Trump has clearly incited violence.  (This applies to claims of Trump's racism as well.)  If anything, Trump has proved remarkably pacifistic for a supposed Republican, both domestically and internationally.  Obama was a holy terror overseas, where his sanctioned drone strikes killed tens of thousands long after the man had won his joke of a Nobel Peace Prize.  During his tenure, Trump started no new wars and ordered only two surgical strikes:  one in Syria, and one in Iran to take out General Soleimani.  And as far as any domestic incitement to violence goes, the left has repeatedly proven itself far more violent than the right. Lame attempts at a "Proud Boys" narrative—as if the Proud Boys represented the mainstream right—are laughable.

Are we close to a hot civil war?  I'd say yes.  I didn't have the space to grab all the comments I wanted to above, but one commenter darkly noted that what we're seeing is a mere preview of what to expect should the Biden government decide to, say, forcefully violate people's Second Amendment right to bear arms.  The left showed the way:  violence is now a legitimate political tactic.  This goes back to what I've been saying all along:  if it comes to actual violence, the side with all the guns will win.  The left, however, seems not to care, so it continues to poke, prod, and otherwise provoke the sleeping giant.  This will not end well for the left, I think, and right now (with apologies to Stateside friends and relatives), I'm happy to be outside of the country.  To be clear:  if the right were to violently eliminate much or most of the left in a street-level shooting war, I wouldn't feel happy or vindicated.  There would be no Schadenfreude—only horror and disgust.  But at the same time, I'd understand where the fury had come from.  Karma's a bitch, and given how things look these days, payback is coming.

Note that many Trump supporters, thoroughly disgusted with old-guard Republicans, are now in favor of starting their own party.  The term "Patriot Party" has been floated around by many Trumpistas.  Such a party would advocate continued avoidance of military meddling on the world stage (a Democrat ideal from the 90s and before), the continued prioritizing of US workers over non-American workers (a Democrat ideal from the 90s), and robust border security (a Democrat ideal espoused by both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama).  A Patriot Party would have no problems with legal immigration adding to the diverse sociocultural makeup of the US, but it would probably demand that incoming immigrants be of the type who can contribute constructively and meaningfully to the US economy.  There would be no room for the shiftless, the lazy, the stupid, and the anti-integrationist.  So, yes:  assimilationism would be a huge plank of the Patriot Party platform:  accept our core values or begone.  The same would be true for election integrity; I can imagine Patriots demanding that all future voting be in-person, with a proper ID, on paper ballots to be hand-counted by staffers of several affiliations so as to keep each other honest.  Patriots would also be unabashed free-market capitalists who would reform corporate tax law and continue deregulating businesses so the economy could function more smoothly.  Their free-market ideas would be implemented in the area of health care as well, making the current US system more like the South Korean system, which is far more free-market oriented than the US system is.

I mention all of the above because Trump voters come in all shapes and sizes.  Trump is not really a Republican by the standard measures of what counts as a Republican; his political DNA remains that of a 90s-era New York liberal Democrat.  Trump spent four years fighting an establishment that hated him for not being a machine politician, for not being a Washington insider, and for not kowtowing to the swamp and the Deep State (which is part of the swamp, after all).  People on both sides of the traditional aisle hated Trump, but what Trump's presence revealed was that both sides of the traditional aisle are actually a single "Uniparty," to use the current term bandied about in the alt-media.  This Uniparty pretends to be donkey-versus-elephant in nature, but in truth, it's made up of rich, privileged elites with a globalistic agenda.  This establishment has been fighting hard to block Trump's efforts, and it manifests in many forms:  the left-leaning and corporatized mainstream media, the Democrat Party, the far left (as embodied in The Squad, etc.), Never Trump Republicans, the Deep State, etc.  It's a corrupt monster that has grown like a cancer and entrenched itself deeply in American society.  At this point, cutting out the cancer is almost tantamount to killing the patient.  Perhaps that's what a hot civil war would amount to:  killing the patient.

I'd prefer a peaceful resolution of differences through civil dialogue, but the country is pushing itself to the brink of violence, and there's little I can do aside from watch helplessly from the sidelines, here in Seoul, as my homeland prepares to eat itself.



first snow of 2021

A ton of light, crunchy, powdery snow—the kind that's perfect for skiing—very suddenly and lustily fell on Seoul this evening.  Below are three pics.  The first was taken near my office; the last two were taken next to my apartment building.



While the snow was easy to walk on tonight, it's going to be a nightmare tomorrow.  If the snow hangs around past Friday, I may have to cancel my 30K Saturday walk from Yangpyeong to Yeoju (see the route in pictures here) with my buddy JW.  We'll see whether the bright sun burns away the snow over the next few days.



Wednesday, January 06, 2021

Go Bong Min Kimbap In: lunch

There's a restaurant not far from my office where the service is fairly friendly, and the food is pretty decent if not spectacular:  Go Bong Min Kimbap In.  My boss says the first three syllables are probably someone's name, and the last three syllables literally translate as "kimbap person," i.e., a maker of kimbap.  I tried going there a second time yesterday, but at 2:30 p.m., I hit the ladies during their lunch hour (ironic:  a restaurant that doesn't serve lunch during the lunch-eating part of the day... is this France?), so after they told me to come back at 3 p.m., I grumbled, walked out, and shuffled over to my go-to Vietnamese place.  Today, I went back at an earlier time, got seated... then waited several minutes while the one lady taking orders jabbered away on the phone.  She finally looked my way and innocently asked, "Have you ordered?"—to which I replied, "I still haven't, no," after which she became apologetic.  "Tell me when you've decided," she said, still on the phone.  "Even if you're on the phone?" I asked.  "Oh!" she said, "So that's why you haven't said anything..."  I guess she assumed I'd be the typically shouty Korean male who simply brunts his way into the restaurant and calls out what he wants without caring.  Anyway, I'd seen a type of doenjang pork dish that I'd never eaten before, so I ordered that along with some ddeok manduguk, i.e., meat-dumpling soup with rice cakes and vegetables.  Here's a pic of the overall meal plus a closeup of the pork:


All in all, not bad.  I'm thinking of becoming a regular at this place, but given the "we're on break" treatment I got yesterday, I'm a bit hesitant.  Most restaurants that serve food like this don't take breaks right in the middle of the lunch period, and being made to wait while the order-taker jabbered on the phone for a long time wasn't the best feeling, either.  The food is good, though, so that's a plus, and the lady who does all the talking (she has the same gravelly voice as singer/actress Awkwafina) obviously means well, even if she's a bit scatterbrained, so I don't attribute any malice to her actions.

Good lunch.  I'll probably be back.



gi-il (忌日, 기일)

It's been eleven years since Mom passed away. I turned 40 the year Mom was diagnosed with the brain cancer that would kill her nine months later; I turned 51 last August, and despite the passage of more than a decade, there are still moments when Mom's death seems to have happened only yesterday. Looking back at old photos of Mom, both healthy and sick, can trigger the tears. Otherwise, enough time has passed that I'm mostly back to living my life.

Mom died a mid-winter death, and that's changed the meaning of this season for me. But these days, it's less about the sadness and more about the contemplation. It's not quite right to say that life moves in cycles, as if nature were constantly repeating itself exactly as it had been before. It's more correct to think of life moving like waves lapping the shore—successive beats that bear certain similarities, yet are distinctly different from each other. Mom had her time on the shore, and now she's receded. I'm having my time now, but one day, I too will recede, and that's right and good.  For now, it's enough to focus on trying to be a worthy son.

Goodbye, Mom—eleven years gone. I love you.





"The Hunt": review

The genre-straddling "The Hunt" is a 2020 action-horror-comedy heavily laced with political themes.  Directed by Craig Zobel and starring Betty Gilpin, "The Hunt" tells the story of rich liberal elites who engage in a slaughter of conservative hicks and bumpkins that they kidnap, drug, and plop down in a quasi-wilderness setting.  The political-satire element of the movie comes through in its dialogue, and both sides are equally lampooned:  the righties make unenlightened comments about "immigrants" and "Jew boys"; the lefties spew scorn at the "deplorables" while virtue-signaling about pet causes and gingerly trying to avoid gendered language like "Hey, guys!" when women are present.

"The Hunt" works as satire, although its plot probably has a few holes in it that don't bear close examination.  What the movie does well, though, is build character for the principals:  Betty Gilpin plays tough-as-nails protagonist Crystal Creasey, and Hilary Swank is nasty liberal sleaze Athena Stone, a CEO who enjoys killing people for fun.  The script does a very good job of getting us to root for Crystal and to despise Athena, so I suppose it's safe to say that, despite the generally balanced satire in the characters' dialogue, the movie shows its bias through whom it portrays as good and evil.

One thing I found absolutely praiseworthy is how Crystal reveals who she is through a show-don't-tell sequence of events.  From very early on, we can see that she's quiet and observant, which is in contrast to all the other, more talkative victims.  She approaches her ordeal stoically, despite starting the movie with a padlocked gag belted around her head.  She shows she's capable of recognizing tripwires and other booby traps, she can sense imminent danger, she shows proficiency in unarmed combat, and she demonstrates an easy competence with a variety of firearms and bladed weapons.  Within minutes, I could tell that all signs pointed to military veteran, and dialogue later in the story confirmed this suspicion.  While I'd love to credit my own deductive skills in figuring this out about Crystal, it's the script itself that does a fine job of allowing us to put the pieces together.

I described the movie as an action-horror-comedy.  There's plenty of action as we watch Crystal and the other deplorables try to figure their way out of their situation—they're seemingly on a patch of ground in Arkansas, complete with nearby railroad tracks, a parked pickup truck, and a country-style general store run by a kindly old couple (Amy Madigan and Reed Birney).  The horror comes from the atmosphere of paranoia the movie generates:  the deplorables, as they make their way around the terrain, quickly realize (or fail to realize, with deadly consequences) they can trust none of the locals.  Horror also comes in the form of sudden bouts of gore as, one by one, the deplorables meet a violent end, with Crystal in the role of a horror-movie "final girl," albeit a final girl capable of dealing out her own horrors as she Rambos her way through the rich yet poorly combat-trained liberals hunting her.  The comedy comes mostly from Crystal herself; actress Betty Gilpin's line delivery is often hilarious, as are the lines she utters, which reflect the horrifically preposterous nature of the situation Crystal finds herself in:  she's living through the scenario laid out in Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game."

As a political satire, "The Hunt" fares less well, mainly because it traffics in straw-man stereotypes of the right and the left.  Of course, a fever-brained leftie watching the movie will be convinced that the racist-asshole righties on screen are accurately portrayed, and vice versa for frothing-rightie viewers, but calmer heads will realize that these characters don't represent any sort of middle ground—except maybe for Crystal herself, who comes off as politically, well, bland.  Right now, in early 2021, the USA is deeply divided along political lines, and for me, that's what makes "The Hunt" more significant than it might otherwise be:  by some accounts, my country is standing on the brink of moving from a cold civil war to a hot one, i.e., one involving physical violence and death.  Viewed through that lens, "The Hunt" could be seen as a discomfiting prophecy about the near future.  I hope to God that isn't the case.

However scary "The Hunt" might be, though, I'd have to call it a thoroughly entertaining movie.  Hilary Swank is a great villainess (she was a good sport to play such a hateful role), and she even gets her own comic moments during the final fight with Crystal.  "The Hunt" is full of implausibilities and ridiculous moments, but it's well acted, well shot, and probably not too interested in saying anything deep aside from "You guys are all assholes."  It's not worth all the controversy that surrounded it when it first came out, and while it barely made back its production cost in box-office revenue, I hope it has a long and profitable life on home video.  If you're looking for bloody action laced with satirical humor and horror, "The Hunt" will be right up your alley.  I enjoyed it.



Tuesday, January 05, 2021

Styx on Biden's inauguration

Biden couldn't drum up enthusiasm during the election campaign, yet he won the election thanks to a tidal wave of votes (cough).  Now, he's trying to warn people away from his inauguration parade, presumably because of COVID. Styx gets his rant on:

During this pandemic, the left has had no trouble assembling in massive crowds for Black Lives Matter rallies and inner-city riots that have done millions of dollars' worth of property damage.  Styx points out that Nancy Pelosi was, at the beginning of the pandemic, urging people to celebrate Lunar New Year in Chinatown.  "Because of COVID"?  Horseshit.  

The left doesn't know what it wants (aside from power), nor does it know what it's saying... nor does it care about any of that.  Internal logical consistency is not a concern of the left.  Stridency is.  Self-importance and self-righteousness are.  Self-reflection, though?  Not so much.  That might lead to the growing of a conscience, and we can't have that.



"Ratatouille" revisited

Way back in 2007, I wrote a review of the Pixar movie "Ratatouille" in which I expressed deep reservations about the movie's protagonist, a rat named Rémy who dreams of becoming a top-tier chef in Paris.  You can find my review here, but the reason why I mention that old blog post is that I just watched The Film Theorists take on "Ratatouille"... and arrive at many of the same insights and conclusions I had arrived at almost two decades ago.  Watch the video deconstructing (and subverting!) "Ratatouille" here:



cake: the sequel

You probably shouldn't bake cakes in square pans:  the corners can overcook or even burn.  Alas, square pans were all I had, and the advantage of baking a cake in two smaller pans as opposed to one large pan (which is what I'd done previously) is that you end up with cake layers that have a coherent shape.  Unfortunately, these pans have a trapezoidal cross-section, so I did have to do a bit of surgery to straighten the outer edges.  Otherwise, the cake came out better-looking than last time, although I still suck at applying frosting/icing.



Cake scraps (do you see my upside-down face in the bowl?):

Damn delicious.  I'm glad to have found this recipe.



eerily prophetic

The following Food Theorists video is about polls that yield wacky results, with a specific focus on a Korean campaign to get kids to vote for a particular flavor of Chex cereal.  The two "candidates" were a type of chocolate flavor—which the kids were obviously supposed to pick—and a type of green-onion flavor, which the kids were obviously supposed to vote against.  Trolls who understood that the vote was rigged from the beginning voted heavily in favor of onion-flavored Chex, and the video's discussion then moves to the larger issue of votes/polling in general.  This video came out right before Election Day last year (November 3); the timing and the significance of this video are eerie, given the electoral shenanigans we've seen.



Monday, January 04, 2021

"Cyberpunk 2077" parody

I've been sort-of following the disastrous rollout of the Cyberpunk 2077 game, which is apparently very, very glitchy—so glitchy that gamers are saying it's no better than a beta-test version.  Ouch.  Lots of gamers are angry after having watched marvelous video clips of the gameplay, which led them to preorder the game in droves.  Result:  crushing disappointment followed by a tidal wave of fury.  Too bad, really, because Keanu Reeves did his part to help market the game, and he even appears as a robot-armed character within it.  (All the "You're breathtaking!" memes out there right now are thanks to Keanu.  Poor, sad Keanu.)

What follows is a cruel parody by YouTube cartoon channel Flashgitz (which I love as much as Meat Canyon), in which desperate-but-amoral Polish executives frantically discuss what to do about the disastrous rollout.  I can't decide whether the bear in the conference room is supposed to represent a Russian staffer.

Jeremy Jahns does his best to review the game charitably:



seen in an Instapundit comments section




Bugs and Fudd through a very twisted lens

Welcome to the hilariously perverse world of Meat Canyon:



an awesome lesson in capitalism

If only more leftists understood this reality.  Watch and learn:

Yes, you do have to work.  No, earning a profit isn't a sin.  Yes, success in life requires effort against the forces of entropy.  No, earning a profit doesn't mean you're stepping on someone else's head.  And no:  no one owes you jack fucking shit.  Do the work.



the party fail

I had told everyone, before I paid off all of my scholastic debt, that once I zeroed that debt out, I'd be celebrating for a week.  Well, I did celebrate—sort of.  I did a two-day walk along South Korea's east coast, starting way up near the DMZ and walking down to Sokcho.  I also baked myself a pizza (homemade crust) very late Saturday night—so late that it was Sunday when I finally ate it.  I also took a walk to Jamshil Bridge with my buddy JW early Saturday afternoon (that's where/when I saw the "zero cool" bus).  Other than that, I did a lot of sleeping, resting, reading, and movie-watching.  I'd had huge ambitions to go out and spend wildly on hotel buffets and the like... and while I might still do that, I couldn't summon the energy to do it during this vacation period.  Going back to work in the morning will almost be a relief.

I've heard from friends that the Parkview buffet at the Shilla Hotel is quite good, so I might head over there at some point when I'm feeling splurge-y.  I'd also like to try Din Tai Fung, a Chinese-restaurant chain that purportedly sells "real" Chinese food, not the typical Korean-style stuff.  I've got other plans for my cash this month, however, including a much-needed visit to the hospital to get the dreaded checkup that men over 50 are supposed to get.  I'll be curious to see whether I can use my insurance to pay at least partially for that procedure.  The last time I visited the hospital for a toe infection, I paid everything out of pocket when the hospital brusquely billed me over the phone at the very end of my visit.

So instead of doing all my celebrating over the course of a week, I might instead be spreading it out over the coming months.  That may be more my style, anyway:  I've never been much of a partier, and concentrated bouts of celebration just leave me exhausted.



Sunday, January 03, 2021

memes via Bill

Another batch of memes, this time via Bill Keezer:




















very uncool

What idiot names his tour bus "Zero Cool"?  Double-plus uncool.




homemade personal pizza

The crust recipe comes from Adam Ragusea:

The sausage is leftover homemade breakfast sausage from a gravy I had made last Thanksgiving (and had kept in the freezer all this time, so don't freak out).  The pepperoni is that shitty Korean pepperoni I had ordered last year.  I need to get rid of it, and while it's pretty awful, I don't want to just chuck it out, so I'm trying to find creative uses for it.  It might work as extra flavoring in a tomato sauce.  We'll see.  As for the cheese... well, I had bought some samplers of Spanish cheese (about which I knew nothing) from Costco, so I layered some slices of that atop the pizza.  Result:  not bad, except for the damn pepperoni.



first meme batch of 2021
















Saturday, January 02, 2021

"Luce": review

"Luce" is a 2019 slow-burn thriller directed by Nigerian-American Julius Onah.  It stars Kelvin Harrison, Jr. as the eponymous Luce, a black child adopted by white parents Peter Edgar (Tim Roth) and Amy Edgar (Naomi Watts).  The story revolves around the nature and character of Luce himself:  originally a child soldier from war-torn Eritrea, Luce has an African name, but he is renamed to the more Anglo-pronounceable Luce, which is ultimately derived from Latin (lux) and means "light."  The name has masculine and feminine cognates—Lucy, Luke, Luc, Lucius, Lukas, etc.  It also connotes darkness as well as light, being derived from the same root that gives us Lucifer, the Light-bearer, a.k.a. Satan.  The ambivalence of Luce's name is a direct reflection of the sinister ambiguity of the story that unfolds before us.

We begin with Luce as a high-school senior in northern Virginia (a fictional school called, imaginatively enough, Northern Virginia High School), giving a speech in front of students and adults.  The speech wins him accolades; Luce is on track to be the school valedictorian that academic year, and he is asked to speak at a different event.  Luce is shown as something of a darling—another Obama-in-training.  He is a deft debater as well as an accomplished athlete who trains for several different track-and-field events.  By all appearances, he has put his bellicose past behind him and fully integrated into American society.  He has friends from all over the racial spectrum, including a white friend who disturbingly describes Luce as black, but not "black-black."

Luce is also shown as having a tense relationship with his history teacher, Harriet Wilson (Octavia Spencer).  The drama truly begins when Ms. Wilson reads a paper Luce has written.  The assignment had been to write in the voice of a historical figure, and Luce chose Frantz Fanon, a Marxist-radical, anti-colonialist political philosopher from Martinique who apparently argued that violence is a legitimate means for resolving political differences.  Disturbed by his paper, Ms. Wilson contacts Amy, Luce's adoptive mother, both to talk about the paper and to say that she has had Luce's locker searched.  The search revealed a brown paper bag full of illegal fireworks, which Ms. Wilson presents to Amy in the hopes that she and her husband will talk to Luce about what's up.

The rest of the movie develops and explores the rising tension between Luce and Harriet Wilson.  We discover that Luce had been dating a Komerican girl named Stephanie Kim (Andrea Bang), who may or may not have been sexually assaulted at a drunken party.  It's unclear—at least at first—whether Luce was among the boys who assaulted Stephanie.  The movie also explores the cost of the teacher-student tension both for the Edgars and for Harriet Wilson, who must take care of a mentally ill sister named Rosemary (Marsha Stephanie Blake).  (Rosemary's illness is never identified, but it plays out like acute schizophrenia.*)  Things come to a head when Harriet's house is vandalized, with Nigger Bitch being spray-painted onto the back-facing sliding-glass door.  Harriet suspects Luce, and it doesn't help that, later in the story, the bag of fireworks somehow finds its way back into Harriet's classroom desk, where it spontaneously combusts at night, setting the classroom on fire.

I admit I'm torn about how much more of the plot to reveal.  On the one hand, the movie insists on its ambiguity up to the very end, so in a sense, it would be impossible to spoil the essentials even if I were to reveal the entire plot.  On the other hand, the way the various conflicts play out is so well written and well acted that it would be a shame to map everything out in this review.  Perhaps it's better to hold back, allow you to go watch the film, and let you draw your own conclusions.

The script gets points for developing such complex characters, as well as for being coy, in many instances, about what motivates the characters to act as they do.  Amy, as portrayed by the always-excellent Naomi Watts, is a mother who feels protective of her son, but who also harbors doubts as the evidence seems to mount that her son is guilty of something.  At the same time, this very ambiguity is also a major minus because it's so obviously and self-consciously scripted.  I was strongly reminded of the movie "Doubt," starring Meryl Streep and Amy Adams—a movie that also tried hard to walk the fine line between possible interpretations while providing a surfeit of strong emotion.  (My two-word review of "Doubt" is here.  I really ought to go back and do a fuller review.)  Such movies, though, leave viewers in a weird no-man's land in which they can sense the characters are passionate and motivated, all without knowing why.  The core of the story is missing when motivation is deliberately hidden from us.  The question What makes Luce tick? is left unanswered.  Is this a good thing or a bad thing?  That in itself is a meta-ambiguity the film drops in our laps.

I can, however, praise the way the script—which is based on a stage play by JC Lee—handles certain themes and issues, such as race, and specifically the question of racial tokenism.  Much is made about how Luce has risen above his childhood circumstances to become not merely a model student, but a model black student, the implication being that his example is something that other blacks should strive for.  Whatever your own views on these issues, I think you'll agree, after watching "Luce," that the movie deals intelligently with this question while also being balanced enough to allow the airing of a more un-PC perspective (in the form of Luce's adoptive father Peter) without mocking, denigrating, or otherwise judging that point of view.

The acting and direction of "Luce" are both top-notch, but your mileage may vary as to how much you appreciate the movie's self-consciously studious ambiguity.  As British reviewer Mark Kermode said in his assessment of "Luce," the monologue-heavy dialogue is a big clue that the story has been adapted from a stage play.  (This is true of "Doubt" as well—another point that "Luce" and "Doubt" have in common.)  I do think that, despite the attempted ambiguity, the movie does lean in a certain direction when it comes to the question of whether Luce is Luce or Lucifer.  The movie does a great job of ratcheting up the tension; its main characters, perhaps because of their complexity, become difficult to like because of the decisions they make.  At one crucial point, one character finally does something unambiguous and outright lies, a move that has dire consequences later on.

If you're a fan of well-acted, slow-burn thrillers, then I think you'll enjoy "Luce."  Tim Roth and Octavia Spencer both deserve kudos for their performances, as does Kelvin Harrison, Jr., who exudes a bland malice that is possibly reflective of the banality of evil.  If you lean toward the PC end of the spectrum, you might not appreciate the seeming racial politics that appear to manifest by the end of the film.  I saw some black reviewers on YouTube who were genuinely disturbed by what they thought the message of "Luce" was.  Some even wondered aloud as to whether the film ought to be considered a horror movie.  They might have a point.  "Luce" definitely got under my skin and has forced me to chew it over, which isn't something I can say about most of the movies I watch and review.  Recommended.


*At one point, Harriet asks Rosemary what meds she's on now, and Rosemary says "Clozapine," which is an antipsychotic often used to treat schizophrenia.



your moment of science-nerdiness

I first saw this video of Michael Stevens and Adam Savage a couple years back, and it fascinated me, partly because it deals with a physical law called the principle of least time:

The shape in question is called a brachistochrone, which is simply part of a cycloid (def. 6).  As you see in the above video, this shape allows a roller that rolls along its length to traverse the distance in the least amount of time.  This may seem counterintuitive at first:  you'd think that the fastest path would be a perfectly straight slope.  As it turns out, though, a straight slope forces the roller to waste time accelerating because it can't take advantage of gravity during the initial moments of the roll.  The brachistochrone, by contrast, dips more radically at the beginning, thus prompting quicker acceleration.  At the same time, the brachistochrone isn't so curved that it describes a too-lengthy pathway from A to B.  It's the perfect balance of several factors—length, acceleration, etc.—that allow a roller to go from A to B in the least amount of time.  Crazy stuff, but utterly fascinating.



funny and sad

Ryan Long's latest video bashes "woke" advertising:

A sad parable of a CEO who discovered the awful reality about the company he'd built:

I call the above a "parable" because, to be frank, it feels more like fiction than fact, although I could be wrong. Even if it is fiction, though, the story contains valuable lessons, for those with ears to hear, about what's important in life.




Friday, January 01, 2021

bad omen?

Every New Year's Eve, the Jamshil Lotte World Tower, currently the tallest building in South Korea, does its version of the Times Square ball drop:  the entire building becomes a huge light show; a digital countdown timer for the final sixty seconds of the year appears on the building's enormous flank; at exactly midnight, the lights go crazy, and fireworks erupt orgasmically into the night as Seoul's largest phallic symbol ejaculates in celebration of the switchover to the new year.  Back when I lived in Apartment 637 of my building, I had an eastward-facing window that gave me the perfect view of Lotte World Tower.  No longer:  I'm now in a westward-facing studio that offers a lame view of construction going on up the street.  But if I go through the fire doors next to the elevators on my floor, I can find eastward-facing windows and look out at the Tower.  About 90 seconds before midnight last night, I started recording the Tower in anticipation of the fireworks.  Here's what I saw:

I can only surmise that, in a time of pandemic-related restrictions, with people not being allowed to gather en masse, there's little point in celebrating the new year.  That's a demoralizing beginning to 2021.  Let's hope this doesn't herald another year of disasters.

ADDENDUM:  Charles declares himself ready to just move on.



Happy New Year!

I think we're all hoping 2021 is a much better year.