Wednesday, January 08, 2020

CMOS on the singular "they"

I'm old-school and therefore not happy with the use of the singular "they" in cases of indefiniteness:

Does everyone have their dildo? Good.
If someone needs a dildo, they should ask Sister Harriet.
My stance is that the word "they" is conceptually and grammatically plural. I don't think this way merely for doctrinaire reasons; I think that, on a practical level, it just makes life easier to recognize that "they" is plural.

Here's what CMOS (The Chicago Manual of Style) has to say:



Q. Now that Merriam-Webster has legitimized the singular “they,” where does CMOS stand on the subject?

A. First, please note that there are two uses for the singular “they,” generic and specific. In 2019 Merriam-Webster added a specific sense of singular “they” to refer to a person who does not identify with a gender-specific (or binary) pronoun (“A Note on the Nonbinary ‘They’: It’s Now in the Dictionary,” Merriam-Webster, September 19, 2019). This use of “they” was recognized in the 17th edition of CMOS, published in 2017 (see paragraph 5.48). So Chicago and Merriam-Webster are in sync on that.

Singular “they” is also used as a generic pronoun referring to a person of unspecified gender, an established usage that nonetheless has long been considered informal. As of the 17th edition, CMOS recognizes that such usage is gaining acceptance in formal writing but still advises avoiding it if possible—for example, by rewriting to use the plural (see CMOS 5.255). Generic singular “they” has been around for a long time, however, and most editors here at Chicago have no problem with such constructions as everyone should bring their favorite book to the event—where “their” refers back to the indefinite (and usually singular) pronoun “everyone.” And many of us have come to accept less firmly established usages such as each programmer worked in their preferred language. Like it or not, “they” has been displacing “he or she” and similar attempts to write around the English language’s lack of a dedicated gender-neutral singular pronoun for some time now. Stay tuned for further developments.



I think the above position is reasonable. It recognizes that the language is constantly changing, but it also recommends treating "they" as what it is: plural.



2 comments:

  1. I'm probably guilty of this faux pas as well. I'm such a lazy writer. Easier to say "if someone wants a Zero, they should avoid Queen Victoria bar" than "he or she should avoid..."

    I apologize in advance for any future misuse!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You can avoid the cumbersome phrase "he or she" by simply picking a pronoun. If you're feeling feminist, that pronoun can be "she."

    ReplyDelete

READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!

All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.

AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.