Below: Tim Pool & Co. discuss the split between red and blue states' handling of the pandemic: the blue states are advocating for strict lockdowns and the removal of basic freedoms; the red states are generally allowing more commerce and freedom of movement. Guess who's doing better in terms of state economies and quality of life? While I'm still unhappy that these issues always end up funneling themselves into red/blue dichotomies, it's obvious that, even with the binary nature of most public discourse, one side has a surer lock on reality than does the other. Neither side is perfect, but one side is obviously saner.
People are doubtless sick of the "4D chess" metaphor by now, but it sure seems as if Trump's federalist approach to the pandemic—i.e., allowing state governments to decide for themselves how to handle matters inside their respective borders—has outed (for those with eyes to see, anyway) which political orientation leads to greater human flourishing, and which doesn't.
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.