If being a "green" environmentalist means believing that it's better to live somewhere clean than to live somewhere dirty, then I'm a greenie. If, however, being "green" means believing that the world is going to end in a decade, and that we have to embrace a bunch of unproven—even stupid—woke policies in an effort to "save the planet," then I'm not green at all.
So here comes a fascinating video that tackles and debunks some of the major points made by people who think that cutting back on the consumption of livestock will somehow benefit the environment. One of the more interesting points the video debunks is the oft-repeated claim that "livestock uses X amount of water while crops use far less." In essence, as the video points out, the water that goes into livestock comes right back out again as urine and contributes to the water table. It's not as though the water consumed by livestock is gone forever. In other words, these wild-eyed activists aren't telling the whole story. Give the video a listen:
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.