Saturday, May 05, 2007

a Marmotic faux pas

Robert Koehler recently blogged about the bizarre case of Judge Roy L. Pearson versus the Chung family. Judge Pearson is suing the Chungs, who run a dry cleaning service, for $67 million. Why? Essentially because he didn't receive a pair of pants on time. I agree with Robert's exasperation at the judge, and had no trouble with Robert's main post.

But then he added this update:

Now, I know I’m treading on dangerous territory here, but might I suggest that race could be a factor here-- Pearson is black, and this being Northeast DC, I’m going to assume for the moment that many of Pearson’s neighbors and fellow customers are, too. Black community, Korean business...

I respect Robert and believe he's sincere in writing the above, but I think this observation is uncalled for because it seems to assume that people in the black community will not share non-black folks' astonishment at the enormity of the suit.

We don't really know what Judge Pearson's deeper motives are in suing the Chungs for this ridiculous amount (and I agree he's way out of line), but to assume this is motivated by race is to make a rather large intuitive leap.

Taken literally, Robert's words aren't controversial. It's entirely possible that, as Robert phrases it, race could be a factor in Pearson's actions. But moving straight to that speculation without first wondering whether, say, Pearson is simply a nutcase, is a bit disturbing to me.


_

1 comment:

  1. When I first heard about this, I did not realize that Pearson - the guy "pressing the suit," as it were, was black. Not that it makes a scintilla of difference.

    He's an asshole who needs to be booted out of his job, have his suit dismissed, and be forced to pay restitution to the Chungs...minus the cost of a pair of pants, which they have already paid him.

    Fuck him. Fuck him to death.

    ReplyDelete

READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!

All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.

AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.