Friday, March 01, 2019

exchanges of ideas, done well and poorly

Here's a study in contrasts for you. In the first video below, we have Jon Miller talking to a retired policeman who is agitating for the legalization of heroin and, seemingly, all other drugs. Miller takes the side of the skeptical Devil's advocate, and what ensues is a clear and respectful exchange (although Miller's evocation of God, at one point, made me wince):


Next up, we have Will Witt from Prager U. attempting to explode liberal conceptions of the supposedly hateful, bigoted right. I see this video as a failure to send the message it's intending to send. Witt offers Donald Trump's recent push for the decriminalization of homosexuality in many gay-unfriendly countries—a single data point—as evidence that the right as a whole isn't bigoted or prejudiced. There's a whole stack of logical fallacies inherent in the way this video has been put together, but watch it for yourself and feel the cringe:


Jon Miller, for all his theatrics, turns out to be a pretty good interviewer. And I normally enjoy the trolling nature of Will Witt's man-on-the-street gotcha interviews, but I found this particular one to be pretty egregious in its tactics—which were, as I said above, logically fallacious in terms of the case he was trying to make.



No comments:

Post a Comment

READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!

All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.

AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.