refuse to define = doesn't exist

Only a bunch of solipsistic idiots could come up with something like this:

Woke Twitter Claims “Woke” Doesn’t Exist If You Can’t Precisely Define It

It's a silly argument: X doesn't exist if you can't define it.

What is a woman?

Since people on the left can't or won't define what a woman is (as Matt Walsh has thoroughly proved), women don't exist. This erasure of women is precisely what people like JK Rowling—a big-time leftie herself—are fighting against.

The left's departure from reality and common sense is incredible to behold. We're reaching Douglas Adams levels of silliness these days.

Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God. 

The argument goes something like this: "I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing. 

"But," says Man, "The Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. QED." 

"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic. 

"Oh, that was easy," says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white and gets himself killed on the next zebra crossing.

—Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy 

(zebra crossing = British term for a crosswalk... pronounce it ZEH-bruh, not ZEE-bruh)

We are busily proving that black is white, up is down, and things like common sense, logic, and the plain evidence of the senses are all wrong.