Seafood, which is consumed worldwide, is apparently going to disappear within five decades as various patches of the global ecosystem collapse due to overfishing, pollution, and other factors (see here for the good news). This is a great topic for Adam Yoshida (check out his awesome haniwa) to blog on: he's got the science background to make sense of the big picture.
As always, my own take is that biodiversity is "good" to the extent that it serves humanity. If we don't maintain biodiversity, we'll die. Nature is value-neutral; human beings are the ones who ascribe beauty and goodness to nature. If "goodness" equates to "human survival," then biodiversity is good.
And if we, as a species, are collectively stupid enough to starve ourselves on a grand scale, then perhaps we deserve our own extinction. The fruits of karma are always condign.
_
Friday, November 03, 2006
seafood no more
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING!
All comments are subject to approval before they are published, so they will not appear immediately. Comments should be civil, relevant, and substantive. Anonymous comments are not allowed and will be unceremoniously deleted. For more on my comments policy, please see this entry on my other blog.
AND A NEW RULE (per this post): comments critical of Trump's lying must include criticism of Biden's or Kamala's or some prominent leftie's lying on a one-for-one basis! Failure to be balanced means your comment will not be published.